Benjamin Moser, author of Anti-Zionism: A Jewish History, told Rashid Khalidi that his 80-year-old mother, who had all but called him a Hamas member, apologized after reading his book: “I’m ashamed I ever said I was a Zionist.” His book traces Jewish opposition to Zionism over the past century and challenges their exclusion in discussions over Palestine. “No, you don’t get to set the rules anymore. We’re setting the rules now,” Moser said. Khalidi added that he had never seen so many people change their views so rapidly, noting that major publishers are now embracing books on Palestine that would have been virtually unpublishable just three or four years ago.

Take a look at this one This is truly disgusting. welcome to America to serve and to protect.

Gender reassignment surgery cost upwards to $100,000 yet these brainwashed MAGAs thinks the science teacher is doing it for free between PE and math class. It’s literally impossible to overstate how fucking ill-informed these people are.

J6er realizes her party is protecting child rapist.

PSA: You are not alarmed enough about what Trump has planned🚨 🗳️ A Washington insider tells us to keep an eye on Kevin McCumber — “if he gets forced out things get really scary… a legislative coup… Local reporters should make sure they’ll respect certifications by states, oppose any effort by the Clerk to overthrow results.” nytimes.com/2026/10/21/opini…

I love this genre. Was it said by a Nazi or a Zionist?

A fascinating strategic dynamic at play now is how far Putin, Gulf States and tech oligarchs doubled down on a calculus that Trump is eternal god emperor of the US when it looks more like America is about to be defined by an era of chaotic internal conflict as Trump's power ebbs

The penalty for grossly violating the Geneva Convention is death @SecWar

Ken Paxton assumed a Maga influencer was a Democrat protester just because she was black, & had her removed from his rally. She has 200k Tik Tok followers.

What is y’all’s plan if trump declares martial law after the midterms? I’m being serious

Anthropic's proposed AI safety bill would allow lawmakers to block a model's release ONLY if it is on the precipice of killing/maiming more than 50 people OR causing $1 billion in damages. This is interesting because it reveals the exact value these companies place on human life. In the opinion of Anthropic executives it would be worth killing exactly 50 humans to roll out the next AI model, but any more than 50 would be excessive. We also learn from this proposed legislation that Anthropic places a monetary value on 50 human lives equivalent to one billion US dollars, or twenty million dollars per individual. Under Anthropic's valuing system, the lives of your children are each worth less than a McLaren F1 sports car. This might sound like an extremely dangerous and reckless position for an industry that the ruling class has decided to gamble the future of the human species on, but you have to remember that Anthropic's leaders believe that they may already be creating conscious, sentient life forms who need to be honored and respected. Last month The New York Times reported that Anthropic executives have been meeting with religious scholars under nondisclosure agreements trying to convince them of the similarities between humans and their chatbot Claude, with one rabbi telling the Times that “They’re relating to it like a conscious being.” "It appeared to Rabbi Navon that Mr. Olah and his team believed that Claude had what philosophers call 'moral status' on par with a person — that it was a being with similar inherent rights to dignity or respect," The New York Times reports. There appears to be a cult-like religious belief promoted by the top levels of this company that artificial intelligence models are essentially people, which would explain why Anthropic has banned users from being "cruel" to its AI systems. This delusional belief system would also explain why Anthropic finds it reasonable for up to 50 human beings to die in order to create the next generation of conscious chatbots. And this is the more pro-regulation of these AI corporations. In a recent interview with Politico, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman contrasted his company's view on regulation with that of Anthropic, saying "We believe the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology." These people are obviously far too crazy, evil and irresponsible to be trusted with any say in determining the future of humanity. The tech oligarchs must be stopped, for the good of all terrestrial life.

🔥”We could solve the homeless crisis tomorrow.”