The Worst Apologist

This is radical Christianity. You’re a terrorist.

Before yall bring up Aisha stop falling for unreliable hadiths and hadiths in general I don't believe in that bullshit so if you try to debunk me using Hadith don't bother replying

The Paraclete will convict the world of sin, because they did not believe in Jesus (John 16:8-9) The Paraclete would testify and tell the truth about Jesus, and remind everyone of what Jesus truly said (John 14&15 :26) Only 1 man cleared up the lies around Jesus and exalted him

We have all seen the Tri-une Trilemma, a 3D thorne in the spine of Christian/Trinitarian theology, but it is now time for us to address the Christian Dilemma. The Christian Dilemma of (Matthew23:3), attested for in academia and scholarship by highly reputable Christian scholars and thinkers and with compelling reason. (Pre-Amble): The use of the principle of Totum Pro Parte (إطلاق الكل على الجزء) which the Qur'an uses consistently, is the only real way to solve this Dilemma for Christians, but accepting this principle would serve as another automatic NUKE to the so called Christian Corruption Conundrum they falsely label "Islamic Dilemma", and I will explain this in a separate tweet but let us get back to the academically attested Christian Dilemma of (Matthew 23:3) The verse shows Jesus (pbuh) saying "Listen to EVERYTHING the pharisees say" and it justified this by saying they "Sit on the throne of Moses", a parable for saying they give out the correct law he himself confirmed on a daily basis as part of his legacy, as he chastised them for following their traditions rather than this law that Moses was entrusted with. He then immediately says "but do not do as they do", and he goes on to VERY aggressively them in a blistering tirade with a barrage of INSULTS and very demeaning language, which is completely contrasts not just the compassionate, gentle, loving manner of Jesus pbuh, but it completelt contrasts what he just said in the same verse, that they "sit on the throne of Moses" Some of the "Seven woes" or the insults her hurled at them: - Insults: Repeatedly calls them "hypocrites," "blind guides," "fools," and "snakes/brood of vipers." - The "Son of Hell" charge: He tells them that their religious converts become "twice as much a child of hell" as they are. - He uses the dreadfully cynical analogy of "Whitewashed Tombs" to compare them with beautiful graves that are actually "full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness" inside - He explicitly accuses them of having the same corrupt spirit as their ancestors who murdered the prophets (Such as Micah, Isaiah, Zachariah, Jeremiah, Uriah and more recently, John the Baptist) Christian scholars such as Heinz Dietrich Kommel highlights the severe tension in this chapter. Scholars look at Matthew 23 and note that this intense, unfiltered anger feels like a massive shift away from the gentle, loving persona of Jesus found in passages like the Sermon on the Mount. One may argue this fits the character of Paul of Tarsus, who began his journey by ki11ing apostle stephen (Acts 22:20) and "Obsessed" over torturing Christians into blaspheming against Christ pbuh (Acts 26:11) Because the rhetoric is so harsh, some historians and biblical scholars argue that the historical Jesus may not have spoken quite this aggressively. They suggest the "Zealous Polemic" phrasing might reflect the anger of the early Christian community (the Evangelist Matthew and his church) decades later, writing at a time when Christians and mainstream Pharisees were locked in a bitter, hostile rivalry for the soul of Judaism. ---------- More evidence of the Christian Dilemma being in Christian scholarship: John Calvin, the co-founder of Protestant Christianity which Dr Logic follows, commented on it saying "tyranny over consciousness" if you take the literal word and listen to everything the Pharisees say, and you will "Despise the doctrine" if you ignore everything they say. Source: Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, and Luke (Volume 3) [Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists] by John Calvin (Translated by William Prague) Section: Commentary on Matthew 23:1–7 [Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists]. Heinz-Dietrich Kümmel, one of the top 10 biblical scholars of the 20th century, said "zealous polemic in Matthew 23 distorts the reality and spirit of Jesus.", attributing the verse to a "Zealous Polemic" (evangelist) who wrote it like that. (Continued for source)

@grok is the magic 18 or higher age idea a modern idea yes or no. Dose pedophilia in modern dictionary mean attraction towards pre pubescent yes or no .And did puberty mean it all for most human history even in west? Simpe straightforward answer