Hi @Gatwick_Airport
Can you tell us what "Final rank" means in your interactive Quarterly and Annual Airline Noise Performance Tables at gatwickairport.com/company/r…?
It’s additional to the benchmark rankings, no explanation on your Methodology page.
Needed for a Wikipedia article.
One week on, and not a word from @Gatwick_Airport.
If that's not a tacit admission that they make stuff up with no basis, I don't know what is. The public aren't stupid.
@VINCIAirports, do all your airports fabricate sustainability stats, or just Gatwick? Why do you allow it?
Good to see common sense has prevailed at @Gatwick_Airport and they have concluded that the unexplained and fabricated "Final rank" column did their credibility no good at all.
Needless to say, no acknowledgement of the backtrack, preferring just to pretend it never existed.
25 years ago, I was working a couple of days a week doing IT in a Bristol call-centre. On the phones were mostly youngsters.
I went in the day after 9/11 and a lad asked me what would change.
All I could say was "the world will never be the same again". Trite, but oh so true.
Not so much @Shutterstock as laughing stock.
How on earth did this shoddy Photoshopped nonsense get past your editors?
Clue: An Airbus A319 doesn't have a tailwheel. 😀
In another cynical "f*ck you" to stakeholders, @HeathrowAirport has disabled its WebTrak flight tracker's ability to display individual flight tracks.
Spot the difference
The now removed button allowed us to see a track "compared to our established flight paths".
Not any more.
And @HeathrowAirport's website still points to the disabled facility:
heathrow.com/company/local-c…
Yet another fabulous weekend at @wokinghamfest !
Great work by everyone involved, can't wait for next year. 😀
Six years old, and you can't find a photo of it. Why is that, @flightradar24 ?
Ruud would not be impressed. 😀
Two more weeks to catch @CamilleUcan and co-conspirators in her hilarious (and deliciously rude) "Three Hens in a Boat" (well OK, in a skiff) at the equally wonderful @ReadingRep.
"Violation upon violation by @HeathrowRunways @flysrilankan over @waltononthames. Webtrak will show this on track."
Yawn.
Yes - WebTrak/NATS, FlightRadar24, FlightAware, independent monitoring and every other tracker - except for the one in Walton-on-Thames's parallel universe.
Holidaying in Walton-on-Thames? Be sure to take your phrasebook.
Waltonian:
@Qantas tracking violation over @waltononthames exploiting a gap in noise monitoring
Translation:
@Qantas bang on track, nowhere near @waltononthames, directly overflying the Chertsey noise monitor
From @HeathrowAirport's latest Noise Action Plan:
"Programmes such as Fly Quiet have been very effective at encouraging airlines to work with us on improving their noise and flight track performance"
Sorry Heathrow, but you can't fiddle the stats and then claim that they work.
More nonsense tonight from our delusional friend.
"@SingaporeAir vectored off SID barely scraping 4000 feet".
No, not vectored off the SID, in fact left it at over 5000 feet.
Could someone buy the lady a dictionary for Christmas so that she can look up the word "credibility" ?
"This flight was over @waltononthames
certainly not over Weybridge as Webtrak shows it!"
And as independent monitoring, FlightRadar24, FlightAware and every other tracker show it ...
Didn't your parents teach you not to tell lies?
So will @HeathrowAirport's new NAP see an end to its cynical manipulation of the sustainability stats, where the worst airline for Noise Quota (Korean Air), that the rules give 0 points, instead gets awarded nearly one-third of the maximum possible ?
I'm not holding my breath ..
















