David Barron retweeted
I was there too! Bailey is a parasite . Gives zero fucks
David Barron retweeted
😤 FURIOUS Maggie Oliver takes the gloves off and directly points the finger at Andy Burnham for blocking action on grooming gangs: “Do something! Stop making empty promises!”
I’ve rarely seen Maggie Oliver so angry and so willing to call out politicians by name. Bear in mind she has a relationship with Andy Burnham going back years, that alone tells you just how furious she is right now, and she has every right to be. The public is right behind her.
Asked by Wilfred Frost whether she is pointing the finger at Burnham for years of promises after local and national reviews, and whether his words are empty, Maggie let him know in no uncertain terms:
“I am pointing the finger! This week he’s talking about the Russell Brand case and David Walliams and saying that the stories of these victims in those cases will bring change and I’m not in any way underplaying the magnitude of what’s happened to those women, what I’m saying is we’re talking about failures over decades.”
“He could not be in a better position now, he is the Prime Minister. He has sent all his lawyers to argue why they should not bring in the recommendations of the 7-year inquiry that gave 7,500 survivors and victims hope that change would come.”
“Theresa May said it was a once in a lifetime opportunity to protect children of the future. It matters! Do something! Stop making empty promises!”
Maggie is a fighter. She’s been doing this for decades, endlessly fighting for real change, yet they’re still not listening. They pretend they are, they praise her, but when it comes down to it they refuse to do what’s actually needed and she’s had enough!
She probably thought things would finally change under Burnham. Instead he’s literally fighting her in court to block the recommendations. The man is a fraud. No different to Starmer and the rest who’ve done nothing.
Keep going, Maggie. Keep the spotlight on them and try to shame him into doing what must be done. 🫡
David Barron retweeted
in 2019 i met Andrew Bailey face to face in connection Trevor Mealham protest ii gave him the evidence off how Lloyd s destroyed my business and others through monies launderings he sent me back to the Police & bbrs who did nothing to help
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: SIMON ANDRIESZ
Still trying to understand this one. @TheFCA is paid to guard us, yet it has asked one of its own board members to review how it treated a whistleblower who died. These are smart people. They know every action gets a reaction and that this one only shames them.
I keep wondering whether it is really their own decision or whether someone else is deciding for them. Either way, Simon Andriesz’s family and every whistleblower deserve an independent reviewer and straight answers.
The FCA has chosen one of its own board members to review how the FCA treated Simon Andriesz @SAndriesz.
They have done this before, and the record shows how it went. Here it is, with who said what.
The Financial Conduct Authority regulates more than 40,000 UK financial firms. Workers who spot wrongdoing can report it to the FCA by law, which makes it the place whistleblowers are told to go.
In 2022 the FCA surveyed whistleblowers. It got 21 responses from 68 people selected out of 1,041 reports. Andy Agathangelou says FOI emails show only cases under 12 months old were included, case officers chose the sample, and the then Enforcement chief Mark Steward asked for more people at the early stage of the process.
In 2024 Ashley Alder was accused of breaching whistleblower confidentiality. The FCA's Senior Independent Director, Richard Lloyd, reviewed it. He found Alder did not follow the policy to the letter and cleared him.
George Patellis says the Parker review of the Connaught fund followed the same pattern. The FCA picked the reviewer, set the scope, and hired him as a Senior Legal Adviser in June 2021.
Paul Carlier and George Patellis have both written back to the FCA to reject its defence of the Paterson review.
This is a long pattern.
A list of FCA statements shared by George Patellis shows lessons learned promises after:
- Northern Rock in 2007
- RBS in 2011
- LIBOR in 2013,
- Co-operative Bank in 2013
- HBOS in 2015
- British Steel in 2018
- LCF and Connaught in 2020.
In December 2014 the FCA Chairman John Griffith-Jones said he was determined it would never happen again.
In 2021 Nikhil Rathi told the Treasury Committee he would not accept that lessons had not been learned.
In November 2025 the FCA said again that it wants to learn lessons.
Now a whistleblower has died and the FCA has announced another review.
Andy Agathangelou has asked Ashley Alder in writing which of the Seven Principles of Public Life the Paterson appointment meets. He also asked why the FCA did not properly enforce against BGC Partners, and what the reason was. He wants answers by 13 November.
A regulator that demands openness from 40,000 firms must show that openness inside its own walls first. That means an independent reviewer, published evidence and straight answers to the public.
Simon Andriesz died on 23 September 2026. Every whistleblower is watching how the FCA treats his case.
Silence tells the next person that reporting is unsafe. We have to demand transparency now, before another whistleblower takes their own life.
Please share this post.
A reviewer chosen outside the FCA is the minimum Simon's family and every whistleblower after him deserve.
Andy Agathangelou has suggested Ron Warmington of Second Sight, and I agree with him.
Ron Warmington @WarmingtonRjw is a forensic accountant whose firm investigated and helped expose the Post Office scandal, which many call the biggest miscarriage of justice in UK history.
If the FCA has done wrong, people with proven integrity like him should be the ones to find it. If the FCA will not accept an independent reviewer of that standing, the public should know why.
@stevemiddi1 @TransparencyTF @appgonifandffs @MLorrM @Wftproof @johnmcdonnellMP @premnsikka @CompassnInCare @JohnCleese
David Barron retweeted
Michael Gove’s ex, Dr. Lola Salem, has been charged with possessing child pornography.
Why the media blackout of this story ?
David Barron retweeted
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: SIMON ANDRIESZ
Still trying to understand this one. @TheFCA is paid to guard us, yet it has asked one of its own board members to review how it treated a whistleblower who died. These are smart people. They know every action gets a reaction and that this one only shames them.
I keep wondering whether it is really their own decision or whether someone else is deciding for them. Either way, Simon Andriesz’s family and every whistleblower deserve an independent reviewer and straight answers.
The FCA has chosen one of its own board members to review how the FCA treated Simon Andriesz @SAndriesz.
They have done this before, and the record shows how it went. Here it is, with who said what.
The Financial Conduct Authority regulates more than 40,000 UK financial firms. Workers who spot wrongdoing can report it to the FCA by law, which makes it the place whistleblowers are told to go.
In 2022 the FCA surveyed whistleblowers. It got 21 responses from 68 people selected out of 1,041 reports. Andy Agathangelou says FOI emails show only cases under 12 months old were included, case officers chose the sample, and the then Enforcement chief Mark Steward asked for more people at the early stage of the process.
In 2024 Ashley Alder was accused of breaching whistleblower confidentiality. The FCA's Senior Independent Director, Richard Lloyd, reviewed it. He found Alder did not follow the policy to the letter and cleared him.
George Patellis says the Parker review of the Connaught fund followed the same pattern. The FCA picked the reviewer, set the scope, and hired him as a Senior Legal Adviser in June 2021.
Paul Carlier and George Patellis have both written back to the FCA to reject its defence of the Paterson review.
This is a long pattern.
A list of FCA statements shared by George Patellis shows lessons learned promises after:
- Northern Rock in 2007
- RBS in 2011
- LIBOR in 2013,
- Co-operative Bank in 2013
- HBOS in 2015
- British Steel in 2018
- LCF and Connaught in 2020.
In December 2014 the FCA Chairman John Griffith-Jones said he was determined it would never happen again.
In 2021 Nikhil Rathi told the Treasury Committee he would not accept that lessons had not been learned.
In November 2025 the FCA said again that it wants to learn lessons.
Now a whistleblower has died and the FCA has announced another review.
Andy Agathangelou has asked Ashley Alder in writing which of the Seven Principles of Public Life the Paterson appointment meets. He also asked why the FCA did not properly enforce against BGC Partners, and what the reason was. He wants answers by 13 November.
A regulator that demands openness from 40,000 firms must show that openness inside its own walls first. That means an independent reviewer, published evidence and straight answers to the public.
Simon Andriesz died on 23 September 2026. Every whistleblower is watching how the FCA treats his case.
Silence tells the next person that reporting is unsafe. We have to demand transparency now, before another whistleblower takes their own life.
Please share this post.
A reviewer chosen outside the FCA is the minimum Simon's family and every whistleblower after him deserve.
Andy Agathangelou has suggested Ron Warmington of Second Sight, and I agree with him.
Ron Warmington @WarmingtonRjw is a forensic accountant whose firm investigated and helped expose the Post Office scandal, which many call the biggest miscarriage of justice in UK history.
If the FCA has done wrong, people with proven integrity like him should be the ones to find it. If the FCA will not accept an independent reviewer of that standing, the public should know why.
@stevemiddi1 @TransparencyTF @appgonifandffs @MLorrM @Wftproof @johnmcdonnellMP @premnsikka @CompassnInCare @JohnCleese
David Barron retweeted
🗞️ FCA chair again asked to step down over Epstein whistleblower death 👇
thebanker.com/content/d6d627…
David Barron retweeted
👏👏 absolutely .. it’s always the victims who carry the distress .. no smoke without fire
David Barron retweeted
Of course she has.
The British state is being handed over to a bunch of racist fascist profiteers
David Barron retweeted
THE REVOLVING DOOR, NOW IN UNIFORM
Former Met commissioner Cressida Dick has been a paid adviser to Palantir since September 2025, @TBIJ reveals.
Palantir has just won a £10m five-year deal with three police forces.
She says she has never lobbied for the firm..
thebureauinvestigates.com/st…
David Barron retweeted
I SAT NEXT TO HER AT PARLIAMENT AND DID NOT KNOW HER STORY
At the APPG summit @appgonifandffs on 2 November, I sat right next to a woman and did not know who she was. Now I do.
Her name is Anna Kavanagh @AllianceBirth. She is co-founder and convenor of the Alliance of Birth Mothers Campaigning for Justice in Ireland. In her speech, she told the room about a little boy taken from his mother, and about a Garda whistleblower who raised concerns about alleged falsification of evidence.
This week the @IrishMailSunday reported her speech in Westminster. Anna told the paper that speaking in Parliament was an important step towards justice.
I think about that a lot. Most person in that room had 60 seconds, and behind every 60 seconds there was a family, a child or a lifetime of being ignored. Some of those stories were sitting just a seat away from me.
If you were at the summit and had 60 seconds, send me your story. A summary of 1 A4 page maximum and the core files are enough, and I will do my best to amplify it.
Thank you, Anna Kavanagh, for standing up, not standing by.
@TransparencyTF @johnmcdonnellMP
Huge respect to Anna Kavanagh @AllianceBirth for her powerful intervention at the Westminster summit on protecting the wellbeing of whistleblowers.
Anna raised the deeply disturbing case of ‘Patrick’, the failures surrounding Tusla and the family courts.
@OCallaghanJim @HMcEntee @breeda_murphy @TransparencyTF
David Barron retweeted
One month ago at @TheFCA public meeting, Andy Agathangelou asked Ashley Alder a yes or no question. Will you resign? Ashley Alder did not answer and moved to the next question.
Since then an FOI reply has shown the only record of how the reviewer was chosen. It is one email in which Ashley Alder tells the Board he had already asked Lea Paterson to review how the FCA treated Simon Andriesz. The FCA found no record of any independence check.
In my opinion Ashley Alder should resign. The world is watching.
@TransparencyTF @nw_nicholas @stevemiddi1 @MLorrM @CartlandDavid @ClareCraigPath @TweetDreams333 @CompassnInCare
David Barron retweeted
WILLIE MCRAE LAST WORDS WERE I'M GOING TO GET THEM
In April 1985, a Scottish lawyer named Willie McRae left Glasgow on a Friday evening heading to his holiday cottage. He never arrived.
He was found unconscious in his crashed car on a remote Highland road with a bullet in his head.
Police ruled it suicide. Case was closed.
One problem. The gun was found outside the car, several yards away. McRae was still inside, seatbelt on, doors jammed shut.
The officer who last spoke to McRae said he was being watched by MI5 and Special Branch.
McRae had patted his briefcase and said he had information and was going to get them.
When that officer later requested his own witness statement under Freedom of Information, he found it had been replaced with a forgery...
Every mention of surveillance, MI5, and the briefcase had been deleted.
There had been a fire at McRae's office the day before. A witness saw a man running from the building carrying a briefcase.
This was not a random lawyer. McRae had just humiliated the British nuclear industry at a public inquiry, blocking plans to dump nuclear waste across the UK.
He was also reportedly investigating a Westminster paedophile ring.
40 years later there has still never been a Fatal Accident Inquiry.
The post-mortem report has never been made public. Over 13,000 people signed a petition demanding answers.
The official position of the British state is that a man who embarrassed the establishment, knew dangerous secrets, and had just told a police officer he was going to get them, then shot himself ... after which the gun walked out of the locked car on its own.
Sources:
@pressjournal
@scotsman
@AlbaParty
@BylineTimes
@PrivateEyeNews
David Barron retweeted
The evidence held by victims @TheFCA sitting on its hands runs into millions of pages. Every single victim of their egregious conduct needs to be heard. Sadly to many victims have passed away those of us still here are still suffering from the consequences of their actions.
@TheFCA is the regulator that supervises the banks, insurers and advisers that hold our savings, mortgages and pensions.
Whistleblowers are one of its main sources of intelligence. Its chief executive Nikhil Rathi says it receives around 1,300 disclosures a year.
@SAndriesz was one of them.
After he took his own life, the Financial Conduct Authority told the public its Board commissioned a review of how it treated him after careful consideration.
A Freedom of Information request from Jasthi Alom produced one email.
In it, Ashley Alder tells the directors he had already asked Lea Paterson and she had agreed.
A regulator that cannot show who chose the person reviewing its own conduct has no standing to demand records from the firms it supervises.
John McDonnell @johnmcdonnellMP is asking the right questions as chair of the APPG on Investment Fraud and Fairer Financial Services @appgonifandffs.
Andy Agathangelou and the @TransparencyTF have been saying the same for weeks.
Please share this post.
Simon Andriesz spent years asking the regulator for help, and the APPG says the FCA ignored his repeated appeals.
Every share, comment and repost keeps these questions in front of MPs, journalists and the FCA Board.
I fear this review could turn into another cover up if people go quiet.
His own case waited 7 years for an outcome. This one needs to be watched from day one, and that takes all of us.
The world is watching, and we will keep watching.
#RSAWhistleblowerFiles
David Barron retweeted
Simon Andriesz asked the FCA for help for years. Now the FCA picks the person who reviews how it treated him. I believe this is a cover up in the making. Journalists, MPs and the public are watching every move.
@TransparencyTF @johnmcdonnellMP @premnsikka @stevemiddi1 @MLorrM @JohnCleese @johncock_wayne @Wftproof
Does the FCA think we are stupid?
I was in contact with Simon Andriesz @SAndriesz. I wrote his story in August, before he took his own life in September, and I have kept writing since. That is why I am writing this today.
Who chose the person to review how @TheFCA treated Simon Andriesz? The FCA's only record is one email, sent by its chairman Ashley Alder to the non-executive directors at 7.20pm on 5 October, the night before its public meeting..
The problem
For weeks, the FCA has told the public, Parliament and John McDonnell MP @johnmcdonnellMP that its Board commissioned the review into how it treated Simon Andriesz after careful consideration. John McDonnell chairs the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Investment Fraud and Fairer Financial Services @appgonifandffs.
On 7 October, Jasthi Alom, a former FCA supervisor, asked the FCA for the records behind that decision under the Freedom of Information Act.
On 4 November the FCA replied, reference FOI2026/02281, and produced one email.
The FCA says it has found nothing else. John McDonnell says there is no record of the careful consideration and no record of the options the Board looked at. The reply also shows no record of any independence check, although the request asked for one.
The FCA's public account and its own paper trail do not match.
The proof
Here is the order of events, from @thetimes, the FCA and John McDonnell's statement.
1 October 2026:
Lea Paterson joins the FCA Board as a non-executive director.
5 October, 7.20pm:
FCA chairman Ashley Alder sends an email to the non-executive directors. In that email, Ashley Alder tells them he asked Lea Paterson to conduct the review shortly after learning of the death, and that she agreed. Lea Paterson and FCA chief executive Nikhil Rathi are copied in. He says he is telling the directors now because of the likely publicity around the public meeting, where the review will be announced.
6 October:
the next day, at the FCA Annual Public Meeting in Edinburgh, Ashley Alder tells the room the FCA considered the independence question very carefully before it appointed Lea Paterson.
At the same meeting, Andy Agathangelou from @TransparencyTF asked Ashley Alder the right question, a yes or no question. Will you resign?
October:
according to the Times, FCA chief executive Nikhil Rathi tells MPs the Board asked for the review..
2 November:
the FCA says the review was commissioned by its non-executive directors. John McDonnell says Ashley Alder wrote to him the same thing.
5 November:
the Times reports the FOI email. The FCA tells the Times that the Board discussed the idea of a review after Simon Andriesz died. The FCA says those talks took place outside a formal Board meeting, so no minutes exist. The FCA also says the directors discussed Lea Paterson's appointment and the terms of reference afterwards, and agreed the terms on 29 October. The FOI reply included no record of any of those talks.
The FCA's own reply describes the email as informing the directors that the review is going to take place. That is the full record the FCA has shown.
What John McDonnell MP says:
John McDonnell says he is astonished. He sees two possibilities. In the first, one person made the decision and it was later presented as the considered view of the Board. In the second, the Board did decide and failed to record it.
He says Simon Andriesz's family, other whistleblowers and Parliament deserve a clear and accurate account of who decided what, when and why. He says he will write to the FCA.
What I think
I support John McDonnell MP. I also support the Transparency Task Force. Andy Agathangelou, its founder, says the FCA is marking its own homework. He called the process a sham and a whitewash.
Look at who is doing this review. The reviewer is an FCA director. The FCA chairman asked her to do it. FCA staff provide her secretarial support. Her report goes to the FCA's own directors. She will not look at whether Simon Andriesz's allegations were true. It looks to me like the FCA has not learned the lesson.
In my opinion, how the FCA treated Simon Andriesz played a huge part in what happened to him. I have no doubts about that. The Parliamentary group says the FCA admitted that an official gave him wrong advice about losing his whistleblower protection, and that the FCA apologised. He deserved better from the regulator that was supposed to protect him.
After he took his own life, his story went viral. Journalists around the world picked it up and the media followed. People in many countries are watching what the FCA does next. The questions will not go away.
How much is a human life worth to the FCA if it keeps treating whistleblowers the way it treated Simon Andriesz before he died? In my opinion, that treatment was inhuman. I fear this review could turn into another cover up. We are watching, the world is watching, and we will keep watching.
What needs to happen
The FCA should publish every record showing who chose the reviewer, and when. It should appoint a reviewer it has no part in choosing, as John McDonnell MP asks.
Please share this article. Simon Andriesz deserves a clear answer.
@jameshurley @stevemiddi1 @premnsikka @nw_nicholas @JohnCleese @Victoria_Rixon @MLorrM @Wftproof @pjhlaw @CartlandDavid @ClareCraigPath
David Barron retweeted
"There are rumours that the King is doing a deal with Fergie to buy her silence." I spoke to News24 about Fergie, the Alphabet Capital payments and the fraud trial Andrew has been summoned to give evidence in.
news24.com.au/lifestyle/cele…
David Barron retweeted
Watch: A panel of NHS executives were left FLUSTERED when Rupert Lowe read out their salaries at a Select Committee hearing
Lowe told Sir Jim Mackey, boss of NHS England, that he was ‘making out like Dick Turpin!’ @RupertLowe10
David Barron retweeted
@ArturNadol7566 'Do the FCA think we are stupid? @johnmcdonnellMP @hawkins_carole @RandolphTrent @vamroses @torysmasher @Whistle @RITB_ @crimlawuk
Does the FCA think we are stupid?
I was in contact with Simon Andriesz @SAndriesz. I wrote his story in August, before he took his own life in September, and I have kept writing since. That is why I am writing this today.
Who chose the person to review how @TheFCA treated Simon Andriesz? The FCA's only record is one email, sent by its chairman Ashley Alder to the non-executive directors at 7.20pm on 5 October, the night before its public meeting..
The problem
For weeks, the FCA has told the public, Parliament and John McDonnell MP @johnmcdonnellMP that its Board commissioned the review into how it treated Simon Andriesz after careful consideration. John McDonnell chairs the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Investment Fraud and Fairer Financial Services @appgonifandffs.
On 7 October, Jasthi Alom, a former FCA supervisor, asked the FCA for the records behind that decision under the Freedom of Information Act.
On 4 November the FCA replied, reference FOI2026/02281, and produced one email.
The FCA says it has found nothing else. John McDonnell says there is no record of the careful consideration and no record of the options the Board looked at. The reply also shows no record of any independence check, although the request asked for one.
The FCA's public account and its own paper trail do not match.
The proof
Here is the order of events, from @thetimes, the FCA and John McDonnell's statement.
1 October 2026:
Lea Paterson joins the FCA Board as a non-executive director.
5 October, 7.20pm:
FCA chairman Ashley Alder sends an email to the non-executive directors. In that email, Ashley Alder tells them he asked Lea Paterson to conduct the review shortly after learning of the death, and that she agreed. Lea Paterson and FCA chief executive Nikhil Rathi are copied in. He says he is telling the directors now because of the likely publicity around the public meeting, where the review will be announced.
6 October:
the next day, at the FCA Annual Public Meeting in Edinburgh, Ashley Alder tells the room the FCA considered the independence question very carefully before it appointed Lea Paterson.
At the same meeting, Andy Agathangelou from @TransparencyTF asked Ashley Alder the right question, a yes or no question. Will you resign?
October:
according to the Times, FCA chief executive Nikhil Rathi tells MPs the Board asked for the review..
2 November:
the FCA says the review was commissioned by its non-executive directors. John McDonnell says Ashley Alder wrote to him the same thing.
5 November:
the Times reports the FOI email. The FCA tells the Times that the Board discussed the idea of a review after Simon Andriesz died. The FCA says those talks took place outside a formal Board meeting, so no minutes exist. The FCA also says the directors discussed Lea Paterson's appointment and the terms of reference afterwards, and agreed the terms on 29 October. The FOI reply included no record of any of those talks.
The FCA's own reply describes the email as informing the directors that the review is going to take place. That is the full record the FCA has shown.
What John McDonnell MP says:
John McDonnell says he is astonished. He sees two possibilities. In the first, one person made the decision and it was later presented as the considered view of the Board. In the second, the Board did decide and failed to record it.
He says Simon Andriesz's family, other whistleblowers and Parliament deserve a clear and accurate account of who decided what, when and why. He says he will write to the FCA.
What I think
I support John McDonnell MP. I also support the Transparency Task Force. Andy Agathangelou, its founder, says the FCA is marking its own homework. He called the process a sham and a whitewash.
Look at who is doing this review. The reviewer is an FCA director. The FCA chairman asked her to do it. FCA staff provide her secretarial support. Her report goes to the FCA's own directors. She will not look at whether Simon Andriesz's allegations were true. It looks to me like the FCA has not learned the lesson.
In my opinion, how the FCA treated Simon Andriesz played a huge part in what happened to him. I have no doubts about that. The Parliamentary group says the FCA admitted that an official gave him wrong advice about losing his whistleblower protection, and that the FCA apologised. He deserved better from the regulator that was supposed to protect him.
After he took his own life, his story went viral. Journalists around the world picked it up and the media followed. People in many countries are watching what the FCA does next. The questions will not go away.
How much is a human life worth to the FCA if it keeps treating whistleblowers the way it treated Simon Andriesz before he died? In my opinion, that treatment was inhuman. I fear this review could turn into another cover up. We are watching, the world is watching, and we will keep watching.
What needs to happen
The FCA should publish every record showing who chose the reviewer, and when. It should appoint a reviewer it has no part in choosing, as John McDonnell MP asks.
Please share this article. Simon Andriesz deserves a clear answer.
@jameshurley @stevemiddi1 @premnsikka @nw_nicholas @JohnCleese @Victoria_Rixon @MLorrM @Wftproof @pjhlaw @CartlandDavid @ClareCraigPath
David Barron retweeted
The SRA is possibly the most criminal of all the "regulators". Paul Philip has presided over outrageous criminal conduct by the likes of Withers LLP. He will probably get knighted for it. The UK is a crime scene from the top down.
A regulator that writes nine-minute blogs about protecting consumers should answer the consumers who report solicitors to it. It does not.
160+ people have come to us about the SRA. 60+ of them, including practising solicitors, hold documentary accounts of reports closed without the evidence being examined. We have written to your Chief Executive 22 times since the 8th of April. Not one reply.
This morning we sent your solicitors an open letter. You have until 4pm on the 12th of November 2026 before we issue judicial review proceedings. The letter is on our website. The clock is running on our homepage.
Who polices the lawyers when their own watchdog fails?
David Barron retweeted
☝️True Story
Some people went to prison following convictions for false accounting & theft, & many were financially ruined. Some victims have since died.👉Nobody from the Post Office or Fujitsu has been held accountable. Paula Vennells honoured for her role as CEO is a disgrace.
