Pinned Tweet
You can't show cars on YouTube anymore without potentially getting copyright claimed lol
youtube.com/watch?v=-vOEGi8W…
Every single politician that supports the Kids Online Safety Act needs to be voted out
This senator is yet another corrupt mass surveillance supporter who is using that same "protect the kids" bullshit excuse
This is why YouTube's Copyright System and copyright law in general sucks so bad. ANYONE can be copyright claimed for ANYTHING, by ANYONE
Even though it's illegal, false copyright claimers/strikers rarely get punished for abusing the copyright system
I've had a copyright claim submitted over a few small Tesla clips in my latest video while talking about some of the sweet Roadster thruster footage. Obviously all fair use. How is it fair @YouTubeCreators that a baseless claim like this can be made by a company that has absolutely nothing to do with Tesla? All monetisation removed again for up to 30 days including shopping and I just need to take it until my dispute expires. Add to that I need to tick boxes in my dispute submission agreeing that
"I understand that filing fraudulent disputes may result in termination of my YouTube channel."
For creators this stuff scares them into being bullied into having their earnings taken away. It only needs a 2 second glance to see that the claim itself is fraudulent, so such claims should never make their way to a creator in the first place.
All the power is with the claimant, almost nothing with the creator. 🥺
This was always about harvesting information. Not only are ID verification laws invasive, but they’re also incredibly ineffective
At the end of the day, it always comes back to the same thing. Parents and guardians need to raise their children properly
Just make sure you don't hit him with a false copyright strike too
Replying to @QuicksandGM
Hey Habibi, Just wanted to say that I was in your chat the first day I heard you in Rust. I really enjoyed your role play and I was supporting you. Went to tune in on another day and I was banned from your chat...
Disappointing that you hoped on the hate train like everyone else even though I treated you with kindness and respect.
So then... what is the point? Such a strange update
Replying to @Dexerto
YouTube clarified that the change only affects videos users have uploaded themselves, rather than every video they watch on the platform
dexerto.com/youtube/youtube-…
YouTube went from hiding the dislike counter, to hiding the dislike button on Shorts, to completely removing the dislike button on Shorts, and now hiding the dislike button on long form videos.
I bet the next update is to get rid of the dislike button entirely 🙄
YouTube is testing hiding the Dislike button on regular videos.
For some users, the button has disappeared from the usual row and been moved into the three-dot menu, while Like is still right there.
So if you want to dislike a video, you now have to open another menu first.
After removing public dislike counts in 2021 and the Dislike button from Shorts, this feels like another step toward making dislikes harder to use.
So essentially, this Terry Schilling guy wants laws mandating ID verification to use social media... because his kids don't want to listen to him
Because he can't raise his children properly, we all have to hand over our government IDs. This is laughably stupid
Ofcom is trying to force companies/organizations outside of the UK to implement ID age verification
Good to see some websites are willing to fight back against mass surveillance!
Imagine defending mass surveillance ID age verification laws by saying "companies have all of your information anyway, so give them more!"
Meanwhile Terry Schilling is too afraid to actually defend his awful arguments live on stream. "Protecting the kids," yeah right
"Let's just dispel this myth: There is no privacy online."
Age-verification for adult websites is common sense, and handwringing over privacy concerns is misplaced. The legislation surrounding age-verification makes data retention illegal. This means that these laws actually enhance privacy protection online.
via @Schilling1776
It's really not "a matter of perspective." You admitted that you didn't even watch Connor's video before you struck him
You have to review a video BEFORE you strike it to ensure it infringes on your copyright. What you did is literally illegal. Your channel should be terminated
Replying to @blaine097
Abusing the system is a matter of perspective. You think it's abusing the system? I do not. And there's no factual thing you can show me and tell me that says that's legitimately abusing the system. That's your opinion. And you still can't tell me where I'm lying. You just say I am, and I'm not.
Still insane that this guy almost got murdered live on stream and Raja Jackson got a slap on the wrist for it
Syko Stu speaks out about the Raja Jackson incident for the first time
“I had to relearn how to walk, I had a severe traumatic brain injury. I was off work for an entire year. It’s still ongoing. I do things multiple times because I don’t remember I did it.
Rampage Jackson wanted me to call him. Then I saw him trashing me on all these podcasts.”
(via @Liveloveneno)
























