DeepRead.com (@Deepread_com) header
DeepRead.com (@Deepread_com) profile picture

Book insights worth spreading.

Joined June 2023
Photo by DeepRead.com (@Deepread_com)Photo by DeepRead.com (@Deepread_com)Photo by DeepRead.com (@Deepread_com)Photo by DeepRead.com (@Deepread_com)Photo by DeepRead.com (@Deepread_com)Photo by DeepRead.com (@Deepread_com)Photo by DeepRead.com (@Deepread_com)Photo by DeepRead.com (@Deepread_com)Photo by DeepRead.com (@Deepread_com)Photo by DeepRead.com (@Deepread_com)
DeepRead.com retweeted
Most of what you read, you forget. Not because you're distracted. Not because you have a bad memory. Because reading and remembering are two different skills, and almost nobody practices the second one. I used to burn through books and retain almost nothing. I'd finish something, feel smarter for a week, then couldn't tell you the author's main argument a month later. The problem wasn't the books. It was that I treated reading as consumption instead of encoding. Here's what actually works: 1. Read with a pen. Highlight the sentence that made you stop. Not every clever line — only the one you'd want to find again a year from now. 2. Write one sentence per chapter in your own words. If you can't, you didn't understand the chapter. Go back. 3. Transfer the highlights into a single document you actually revisit. The notebook in your drawer doesn't count. The notes app you never open doesn't count. One place. Searchable. 4. Teach it to someone — out loud, over coffee, in a post. The research on the protégé effect is clear: preparing to teach forces you to encode in a way passive reading never will. The reason most people forget what they read isn't a memory problem. It's that they finish the book and move on. The retention happens in what you do after you close it. Reading more books isn't the goal. Remembering a few of them is.
25
153
10
778
30,935
DeepRead.com retweeted
iPhone Duo app ideas: 1. ebook on right, map or illustrations on left
134
362
114
9,341
928,408
DeepRead.com retweeted
Astra, make this photo interactive and find the books
193
889
152
11,205
1,246,065
DeepRead.com retweeted
since you guys loved the exploding tesla.. I used GPT-6 Astra to create a 3D website that pulls apart the male anatomy into 2,234 modeled pieces! we are in a renaissance of learning
1,150
5,407
1,027
53,210
8,054,761
DeepRead.com retweeted
The dream setup for late-night readers.
445
3,112
1,135
18,969
1,518,933
DeepRead.com retweeted
how to educate yourself: 1. impose rigorous standards on yourself 2. you learn via struggle. messy first draft? good. design coming out wrong? good. fight through it, never outsource the struggle 3. go down intellectual rabbit-holes whenever you want 4. read the "Great Books" but also create your own rubric of what constitutes "great" 5. learn from field visits (a writer should attend comedy shows to see how different words "land," a designer should learn color palates from nature walks, etc) 6. practice, because you learn much more from output then input 7. the most important part of education are the unknown unknowns: things you don't know you don't know. develop a "serendipity-rich calendar" that is set up for discovery and surprises 8. compare and contrast different methods within the same subject (for example: analytic vs continental approaches in philosophy) so you can develop an idiosyncratic method that is truly your own 9. learning is just extended attention devoted to things that organically excite you. but in this world, only a tiny minority are capable of "extended attention"
5
43
4
292
10,468
DeepRead.com retweeted
"Read books!" They said, "It'll be fun!!" They said Now I have a reading addiction, impossibly high standards and I'm unsatisfied with the real world.
49
449
21
2,650
41,954
DeepRead.com retweeted
I'm rapidly discovering that the only way to use artificial intelligence effectively is if you have real intelligence...
267
6,261
398
25,866
416,579
DeepRead.com retweeted
You cannot create God and put him on a leash.
1,580
1,431
660
16,402
9,229,247
Remember to treat your body like a data center. Consume as much literature and water as possible.
348
13,438
334
88,095
1,935,065
9
180
12
884
28,009
111
6,827
117
46,426
587,393
DeepRead.com retweeted
“The meaning of life is to find your gift. The purpose of life is to give it away.” — Pablo Picasso
46
664
50
3,599
82,286
“Ours is the age that is proud of machines that think, and suspicious of men who try to.” — H. Mumford Jones
1
6
925
DeepRead.com retweeted
6
20
1
157
5,903
DeepRead.com retweeted
“A man wastes, his life preparing for a future that was never promised, while the life he truly owns passes right through his hands.” - Seneca
34
502
21
2,362
49,048
DeepRead.com retweeted
Much commotion about this new Anthropic paper, and it's legitimately interesting work. But they are playing coy with quasi-philosophical claims that are not justified by the results. By framing the results in the language of "access consciousness," Anthropic is, deliberately or otherwise, throwing more mud into already muddy waters, inviting an inference the data cannot support but that people will draw, and already are drawing. As Anthropic themselves concede, this does not speak to whether LLMs might have phenomenal consciousness, the "something it's like" of experience. Frankly, neither does the original GWT it's modeled on. This has been the source of enormous confusion for decades. Reportability and deliberate reasoning are behaviors that are co-extensive with phenomenal experience in humans, but they do not entail phenomenology. In fact, as I've argued elsewhere, the success of LLMs drives a hard wedge between these two things. Linguistic report turns out to be a self-contained generative process that can run in full, workspace and all, without any sensory grounding whatsoever. This suggests that consciousness-adjacent language is possible without conscious experience. If anything, this paper strengthens the case that reportability and phenomenal experience come apart. Good science. Really good marketing. Bad philosophy.
New Anthropic research: A global workspace in language models. Of everything happening in your brain right now, only a tiny fraction is consciously accessible—thoughts you can describe, hold in mind, and reason with. We found a strikingly similar divide inside Claude.
17
16
5
86
11,296
Reject the man cave. Embrace the personal library.
Reject the man cave. Embrace the personal library.
3
18
1
254
7,619