The Democratic Difference (@DemDifference) header
The Democratic Difference (@DemDifference) profile picture

An account focused on highlighting differences in economic outcomes under Democratic and Republican policies, often with charts.

Joined August 2014
Photo by The Democratic Difference (@DemDifference)Photo by The Democratic Difference (@DemDifference)Photo by The Democratic Difference (@DemDifference)Photo by The Democratic Difference (@DemDifference)Photo by The Democratic Difference (@DemDifference)Photo by The Democratic Difference (@DemDifference)Photo by The Democratic Difference (@DemDifference)Photo by The Democratic Difference (@DemDifference)Photo by The Democratic Difference (@DemDifference)Photo by The Democratic Difference (@DemDifference)
The Democratic Difference retweeted
Weird, I didn’t see @JDVance mention #1 in his post I wonder why??
National exit (sample: 79,668) -- Importance of issues to your vote: GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION Crucial/Major - 90% Minor/No factor - 10% COST OF LIVING Crucial/Major - 89% Minor/No factor - 11% IRAN WAR Crucial/Major - 74% Minor/No factor - 26% IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT Crucial/Major - 73% Minor/No factor - 27% AI & DATA CENTERS Crucial/Major - 56% Minor/No factor - 44%
31
214
2,870
114,258
The Democratic Difference retweeted
cackling
Mike Rogers ended up at 5% in Detroit, short of the 7% he got in 2024. 'Dems for Mike Rogers' wasn't really a thing there.
77
504
2
8,288
79,304
The Democratic Difference retweeted
Replying to @JDVance
Hey I just checked on Wikipedia and you were Vice President this whole time. Swear to God you can look it up.
8
173
2
3,128
54,588
The Democratic Difference retweeted
Reporter: "Senator Hyde-Smith all but declared victory last night. I want to get your response." Colom: "Bless her heart."
96
1,939
212
29,007
1,538,029
The Democratic Difference retweeted
WSJ's @greg_ip : Health insurance is the sleeper inflation issue: wsj.com/finance/investing/he…
1
14
2
37
3,355
The Democratic Difference retweeted
This shit better say Lake Ontario by 9AM @Google @sundarpichai
173
7,077
67
127,332
949,884
The Democratic Difference retweeted
Trump's final pre-election speech was a reminder of how out of sync he was with voter concerns, appearing in front of the Reflecting Pool to talk algae and pipes rather than the cost of living. It was as if Nixon had made his final pre-election speech in front of the Watergate.
4
9
39
4,877
The Democratic Difference retweeted
Every single election denier running to govern a swing state lost last night, by the way.
16
345
14
1,758
41,558
The Democratic Difference retweeted
Elon Musk dropped nearly half a billion dollars on the midterms. 98% of the money he spent on specific candidates went to losers.
111
753
91
2,577
92,176
The Democratic Difference retweeted
The most important line here isn’t in the analysis. It's: “Many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)” Man, if you’re living in a world where you think “many” people were focused on a Fox News celebrity the day before the midterms, you need to take a break from the internet. I'd prefer a vice president who doesn't know what a Fox & Friends co-host is saying from one moment to the next -- or, even better, doesn't care.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
40
144
9
1,138
121,788
The Democratic Difference retweeted
"Worst of all, the detour to revisit the Reflecting Pool distracted from Trump’s true closing message: that Senator Jon Husted of Ohio has a great body" theatlantic.com/politics/202…
13
76
3,846
The Democratic Difference retweeted
'In 1860, an enslaved man named Sheppard Peek was listed among the possessions of William Peek. His value was placed at $1400. More than a century and a half later, Sheppard’s great-great-granddaughter, Keisha Lance Bottoms, was elected governor of GA' ajc.com/politics/2026/11/kei…
222
12,694
658
44,168
701,202
The Democratic Difference retweeted
WE JUST ELECTED THE FIRST BLACK GOVERNOR WEST OF THE MISSISSIPPI!!!!!!!!
Democrat Aaron Ford is elected Nevada governor, defeating Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo. apnews.com/live/midterm-elec…
9
200
4
3,025
26,445
The Democratic Difference retweeted
Ken... Paxon? Paxton? Never heard of the guy
3
25
226
16,635
The Democratic Difference retweeted
The 1994 “revolution” saw Rs win the popular vote by 6.8 pts 2006 was D + 7.9 2010 was R + 6.8 2018 was D + 8.6 2026 Ds are tracking toward a 13-pt popular vote win Have to go back half a century—the post-Watergate wipeout of 1974, D + 16.8 pts—to find anything like this.
Spent the last month wondering if 2026 could be 2006 all over again. Nope. Bigger by every metric. In fact, the biggest midterm wave in modern history—an election to which every future midterm will be compared.
16
477
28
1,441
138,002
The Democratic Difference retweeted
so funny to pick 1970 as the year here teapawt.net/bennyjohnson/status/21…
In 1970, the White population in Texas was 89%. In 2000, it was 50%. Now it’s less than 39%. Demographics is destiny.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
In 1970 the White population included Hispanic people because surveys in Texas didn't ask about Hispanic ethnicity as a separate question from race. In 2000 the White population for just race was 71%. Today White is 74% and "White, not Hispanic" sorted for ethnic origin is 37%. census.gov/quickfacts/TX
2
9
36
6,321
The Democratic Difference retweeted
The Democrats popular vote margin is the largest of any party's since 1976 economist.com/interactive/gr…
5
454
45
2,335
126,441
The Democratic Difference retweeted
I’ve seen enough: generational wipeout.
215
4,086
193
31,569
1,281,327
The Democratic Difference retweeted
Democrats have won gained full control of 6 state governments. Arizona, for the first time since the 1960s. Pennsylvania, for the first time since the 1990s. Wisconsin, for the first time since 2010. Michigan Minnesota Nevada
9
269
9
1,073
24,075