Screenplay_Is_Good

TO ALL THOSE X WARRIORS who havent watched Ramayana but have all sorts of opinion on the movie those who spent money and time to watch the movie and found it good 1. They have shown Ravana as feminist - No they havent, he kidnaps a lady wearing a disguise and one of his 10 heads says lust, you have done lot of bad deeds out of it, He kills his sisters husband even after he says sorry in front of all his mom and family and entire clan is shown as drunk lusful voilent rapacious crowd in contrast to serene, ethical, virtually blemish less Ayodhya and its people 2. Entire forest have become cursed, dark, bereft of life just because Asuras live there and as soon as Rama sets his foot and cleanses the forest, they become green with life and beautiful. Asurs are shown as virtual Trolls or zombies who just live like Filth and destroy everything, i donno who felt any thing other than hate for them after seeing the movie 3. Ravan family is shown as opressed, No, they live virtually lik wretches in Rasathal after Bhagwan Vishnu killed Ravana/s granddad and this is exactly how it is written in UttaraKand. That is why Ravan’s mom keeps filling his ears with hatred towards Vishnu. Mantara does the same with Kaikeyi who ends up sending Rama to forest, though she loved him so much, imagine how much hate u develop when ur mom fills hate ? 4. Lakshman lifts sword on Dasarath and Kaikeyi after they ask Rama to go to forest Yes this is what Valmiki wrote, Lakshman calls his dad old man who has lost his mind due to love for his young wife and hence he must be killed 5. Parasuram respecting Rama is not how Ramanand Sagar showed it, but in Valmiki Ramayana, Parasurama bows to Rama when he realised that Rama is next avatar and his avatar is over after Rama strings Saranga bow of Maha Vishnu 6. Hey Rama is running from Asura during Kara dushan fight - he didnt sweat to kill them in TV serial Valmiki Ramayana depicts it even more brutally, Rama is hit many times and bleeding while fighting Asuras in Dandakaranya 7. Ravana is shown as good leader who shares his wealth with Asuras, yes Ravana is the only Asura King who build kingdom of Gold (off course they show how he loots the 3 worlds to get it) and in Kiskinda Kanda valmiki depicted Lanka as so rich, full of gold and how luxuriously everyone lived in the country, so Ravana didnt himself take all gold, he shared it with his Asura clan. In short, it is an extraordinary achievement in Indian cinema, and give the movie a chance than putting it down due to prejudice, some one who spent thousands of crores to take hindu epics to the world must be encouraged by any right thinking hindu without nitpicking about small things It is after all a movie and movie always take cinematic liberties, unless it is really hurtful to our GODS, we shouldn’t oppose it That is why i am spending so much time to write about it, I do this for any attempt to showcase India to the world Hence I wrote so much about Dhurandhar and will write much more about Ramayana