Pinned Tweet
A. You send Republicans a message by not voting.
B. Dems take control of Congress.
C. They send you a message.
D. It will be unpleasant.
E. You will regret your decision.
Bookmark this.
DocWashburn retweeted
In France if you want a coffee or a sandwich you just loot the shop now. That is how it works. Macron will say these students were just hungry, you have to understand them.
DocWashburn retweeted
African migrant students in Germany admit to targeting white German students as revenge. As revenge for what is not clear.
Do we want these people in our country?
The Left & Globalists tell them to hate us....they want an anti-white genocide. Suicidal lunatics.
🇩🇪🔴 "I get bullied in school for being German like 'German potato' or 'dirty German.' It's just really crappy to be bullied in your own country."
Germans are finding themselves outnumbered and even attacked in schools across the country.
Foreigners also admit to targeting Germans "because people want revenge for what was done to us."
When asked, two foreign girls smile as they describe Germans being systematically attacked for being White and German.
Follow: @RMXnews
DocWashburn retweeted
Living in a Western Society should be a privilege not a right!
Mass deportation is the only answer for migrants without the correct culture.
They must love our society, want to assimilate, be culturally compatible & not a burden to taxpayers.
DocWashburn retweeted
🚨“Stab me, you’re dead”
That’s the new normal on a London street in broad daylight - one man openly brandishing a machete, the other daring him to use it while filming.
Sadiq Khan keeps calling this the world’s safest city. The video says otherwise.
London has fallen.
DocWashburn retweeted
Muslim men beating themselves during Muslim religious ceremonies.
Religion of Peace - laughable!
What kind of God tells people to hit themselves in the face and head until they bleed?
Like, seriously — if God is supposed to be merciful and care about you, why would He want you deliberately hurting yourself?
This doesn’t look like worship.
It looks like something that wants people broken.
A good God wouldn’t ask for that.
Only Satan would !
Convince me Islam ain’t a cult , I’m waiting !
DocWashburn retweeted
Abdul El-Sayed said on CBS’s “60 Minutes” that Palestine has a right to exist but offered conditions when asked if the same is true of Israel.
DocWashburn retweeted
Replying to @redsteeze
This was worse than anything that ever came out of Kamala's mouth…
DocWashburn retweeted
The failure here isn't Abdul Al-Sayed. The failure is the entire media complex who has decided they are not going to
question him on such things. This is a failure of journalism.
He has never been pushed on his family connections for the Muslim brotherhood, because journalists don't want to be called Islamaphobes. He has never been pushed on biological males competing in women's sports because the media doesn't want to approach that issue, and he has never ever faced any of these questions.
This is a failure of journalism.
.@AbdulElSayed says it’s ok for MEN to be in girl’s locker rooms.
Why?
“Well because they are going to find out about it on the internet anyway”
Completely unacceptable.
DocWashburn retweeted
Anderson is infinitely more upset with Stevens than he’s ever been over AES being an antisemite.
WATCH: Michigan Democrat Congresswoman Haley Stevens tells CNN why she endorsed Republican Mike Rogers for Senate over Democrat Abdul el-Sayed...
Cooper: "Your fellow Michigan congresswoman, Debbie Dingell, said that she talked to you at midnight last night, and that you told her you were not going to endorse Mike Rogers. If that is true, what changed between then and this morning?"
Stevens: "Well, look, this is just a weight off my shoulders, okay? Abdul has been getting angrier and angrier. I was trying to help, and I endorsed him. That ad was very painful. There are so many Democrats who want to vote for our Democratic nominee, and they're just being told, 'hey, this is a party you don't belong in,' or 'this is a campaign you don't belong in.' And I've never cast a present vote in the Congress. I'm making a decision here. And, you know, that's just where I landed on this. I woke up this morning clear-eyed, fresh, and, you know, focused on what was in my heart. And that's that, you know, and there's a lot of incredible things going on around Michigan. And frankly, this country, with these elections here."
DocWashburn retweeted
More about PolicyLink's "soul work," which is covered in UNELECTED - thanks to @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan for finding this:
DocWashburn retweeted
🚨🚨 DEMOCRACY FILES / THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 13: THE NEW FOUNDING 🚨
The "democracy" ecosystem is mostly decentralized. There's competition sometimes (as this drop will show). But when a direction has been set by funders, actors converge towards a common goal.
And that goal is: American government must be rewritten from scratch, and soon.
RAD, the project of ex-USAID workers we've been tracing in the Democracy Files, represents one plan. PolicyLink represents another plan.
What is PolicyLink?
Towards the end of UNELECTED, I write about PolicyLink - a highly connected NGO which receives more than $50 million annually in funding. There, I describe its "soul work" - engineering the human soul to create a renewed democracy. That's not an exaggeration; that's how they describe it, in their own words.
PolicyLink appears again in the Democracy Files. Here, you can see PolicyLink personnel use the same language we've seen in prior drops: founders, a new founding, redesigning the federal government.
PolicyLink has over $100 million in assets and receives its funding from all the usual suspects - Rockefeller, Open Society, Ford, Gates, etc. It has worked closely with Democratic administrations in setting policy.
RAD and PolicyLink compete for the same funders and the same space. But they say the same thing: a "new founding," drafted by people no one elected, ready "before the window opens."
RAD is perhaps simply more honest about how that window will open.
DocWashburn retweeted
Tucker declares that if Trump strikes it will be Netanyahu’s fault, and if he doesn’t, it will be JD’s success.
As usual, Tucker gives no agency whatsoever to Trump himself.
And as usual, he provides NO PROOF for his claims.
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer.
Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.
To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha.
The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people.
And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final.
We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it.
Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made.
They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making.
One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
DocWashburn retweeted
I cited a Hadith about Muhammad raping a 9 year old. I told them it was Trump. They called it disgusting.
Refused to condemn it when they learned it was their prophet. Why?
DocWashburn retweeted
Imagine being a federal judge looking at a Senate race where, according to the New York Times, people tied to Mary Peltola's campaign and the DSCC went digging through voter rolls to find a retired teacher from Petersburg named Daniel J. Sullivan, and he ends up on the same ballot as Senator Dan Sullivan in a ranked choice state that was already built to confuse people… and your answer is that nobody can do anything about it.
That is what Judge Sharon Gleason just did. She threw out the DOJ lawsuit to set aside the ballots cast for the decoy Dan so the fraud could actually be investigated, and she did it for three reasons that should make every voter in this country sick. The federal government lacks standing. Separating those ballots would violate ballot secrecy. And it is too late to change anything this close to Election Day.
Let me explain what that means in plain English. There is a federal criminal probe with grand jury subpoenas out, the Governor of Alaska ordered his own state investigation, and the court's answer is basically tough luck, the clock ran out, count them anyway. Too late? Too late for who? The people who planned this knew exactly when to run it, and they knew a court would say the words "too close to the election" because that is what courts say every single time the deck is stacked and the timing is the whole trick.
And ballot secrecy… really? Nobody is asking to see who you voted for. They are asking to hold the votes cast for a candidate who may only be on that ballot because somebody went shopping for a man with the right name. How is protecting that a defense of democracy? How do you look the people of Alaska in the eye and tell them the system cannot pause for a scheme everyone can see?
Peltola says she knew nothing. Maybe. But you have seen this movie before, the operatives do the dirty work, the candidate keeps clean hands, the judge says no standing, and the result gets certified long before anyone gets to the truth. Same same.
This is institutional rot dressed up in a robe, and the only thing a federal court managed to protect today was the scheme itself.
Judge Gleason, you were handed a chance to protect the integrity of a United States Senate election and you hid behind a calendar.
DOJ, appeal it today and do not stop until every person who recruited that decoy is sitting under oath.
Pray, Stand, Speak, ACT.
Love,
What all of you good people are thinking
🚨 BREAKING: One Obama judge just THREW OUT Trump DOJ's lawsuit to set aside ballots cast for the "fake" Dan Sullivan in Alaska's Senate race, so the fraud can be investigated
UNBELIEVABLE!! Go to SCOTUS.
Judge Sharon Gleason ruled the federal government lacks standing, says separating those ballots would violate ballot secrecy, and says it's too late to change things this close to Election Day 😠
So the decoy candidate, the one at the center of a federal criminal probe with dozens of subpoenas out, stays on the ballot, and votes for him count as CAST AND VALID
We need to secure this win for Dan Sullivan and prosecute everyone involved.
DocWashburn retweeted
The biggest give away in all of this is an ethnic genocide supposedly happened and they are making jokes about it. It's now just a punchline for clapter.
Every single one of these people know that an actual genocide never happened.
Michael Che on SNL Weekend Update just said Israel’s record voter turnout is great “regardless of if you’re on the right side, or the left side, or the genocide.”
That’s not a joke. That’s a blood libel dressed up as comedy, broadcast to millions while Israelis just voted in massive numbers after years of war and terror.
This election shows a free, functioning democracy one in which had the highest Arab Muslim Israeli turnouts as well.
Calling the war in Gaza “the genocide” is the same ancient libels recycled for the camera.
Comedy stops being comedy when it launders the same false claim used to justify attacks on Jews.
DocWashburn retweeted
If El-Sayed loses, there will be no self reflection or questioning of the strategy to ostracize Haley Stevens and ignore Jewish safety concerns.
No, @WajahatAli says we should go straight to an intifada against Jews, proving Haley & the voters were absolutely right.






























