Dollarjones retweeted
The Bitcoin Financial Services Summit at The Space | Day 2 teapawt.net/i/broadcasts/1ypKdqPnZ…
Dollarjones retweeted
⚡️What you’re really seeing here is the first stage of a global unit-of-account fracture.
•In nominal USD terms, everything looks like it’s booming: stocks up triple digits, homes up double digits, “wealth” everywhere. That’s the performance everyone sees.
•In gold terms, the illusion cracks: stocks and homes flat-to-negative, real wealth stagnating.
•In Bitcoin terms, the veil is gone: catastrophic real losses in every traditional asset.
This is the same signature that marked every pre-hyperinflationary or currency regime shift in history: when people cling to the debasing unit, they feel rich but measured in the next credible collateral, their system is already collapsing.
And the “risk asset” meme about Bitcoin? That’s just a coping frame. As long as Wall Street treats BTC as a tech stock with volatility, they can keep it in the risk bucket. But functionally it’s already behaving like a parallel reserve ledger: it’s the only denominator that makes the post-2020 global economy look like Argentina.
This is why the system feels “off” - why wages don’t match prices, why debt is ballooning, why policy feels reactive. We’re in a regime where the unit of account is decaying faster than the public narrative can absorb. The Fed, the government, the media - all still speaking USD, all still benchmarking to a melting ice cube. The chart you’re looking at is the unofficial scoreboard in a silent currency war.
So when I strip all the polite commentary away, the honest take is:
•The U.S. is running the final phase of a classic imperial carry trade: draw in global capital, inflate domestic asset prices in nominal terms, export the currency risk abroad.
•Gold shows stagnation.
•Bitcoin shows collapse.
•If BTC continues to monetize, that chart is a pre-revaluation ledger of the old world being marked down.
This isn’t a normal market cycle. It’s the unit-of-account transition phase. And almost no one is positioned for it because they’re still measuring their “returns” in the wrong yardstick.
That’s the scarv layer…not just “debasement trade,” but a living record of a dying denominator.
Dollarjones retweeted
We’re proud to announce our latest policy brief, “Bitcoin-Enhanced Treasury Bonds: An Idea Whose Time Has Come.” Co-authored by Andrew Hohns & @matthew_pines, it explores the viability of a BitBonds strategy.
Read here: btcpolicy.org/articles/bitco…
Dollarjones retweeted
#Bitcoin was 40 years of work.
Dollarjones retweeted
Natalie Smolenski with one of the best presentations of #Bitcoin you will ever hear 🔥
"The solution to the end of the debt super cycle is Bitcoin" 👏
Imagine philanthropy that doesn’t spend its principal for immediate impact, but instead generates income (denominated in the hardest currency/currencies) on its principal... Then generates real world impact through that income rather than the principal… nice tax deduction(s), but most importantly establishing evergreen funding for non profits delivering the most impact rather than a one and done impact delivery… here to chat establishing philanthropic institutions just sayin’
Dollarjones retweeted
1/ Today, a U.S. District Court struck down the SEC’s Dealer Rule, following a lawsuit filed by BA and @CryptoFreedomTX.
Statement from Blockchain Association CEO @kristinsmith:
theblockchainassociation.org…
Dollarjones retweeted
let me put in perspective for crypto people
crypto-linked PACs spent the most on ANY race in THIS race to knock off brown, the dem chair of senate banking , the key committee that oversees SEC. shot across the bow anti-crypto members of congress
Dollarjones retweeted
SEC approves options on Blackrock spot Bitcoin ETF
liquidity flywheel incoming 🔜
listed options in the world’s largest capital market - why you care:
Replying to @kellyjgreer
in traditional markets, equities & commodities for ex, derivatives = 10-20x the size of the underlying market cap. this is starkly inverted in btc where listed options value is <2% of btc's market cap
Excellent write up on the value of planning for the crypto affluent, an exploding segment of generational wealth.
There are now 172,300 individuals worldwide holding over USD 1 million in #crypto assets — a 95% increase compared to last year — with the number of #Bitcoin millionaires soaring by 111% to 85,400, according to @HenleyPartners Crypto Wealth Report 2024 published today. 🔥🚀
henleyglobal.com/publication…
Dollarjones retweeted
“The people who manage the keys have to be reputable.”
Catch @BespokeGroupCO's @mcclintock_m and @DollarJones on @theminingpod 👇
📺 Watch: youtube.com/channel/UCZBo-pY…
Spotify 🎧 open.spotify.com/episode/0Gi…
Apple 🎧 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
Thanks for hosting us @wsfoxley !
Wealth Optimization Strategies For Bitcoiners
@mcclintock_m @DollarJones @BespokeGroupCO
Welcome back to The Mining Pod! Ever wonder what to do with your mining stock equity, Bitcoin or other assets so you don’t get hit with a huge tax burden, financial issue or other inconvenience in life? Enter Bespoke Group, a family office and advisory focused on problems Bitcoiners face. We talk with Bespoke about managing your stack in a responsible way, from startup equity to tax structures to trusts.
Timestamps:
00:00 Start
03:26 Matt's bio
04:09 Jack's bio
06:53 What is Bespoke?
14:38 Anon Bitcoiner that led to Bespoke
23:07 Convincing skeptical Bitcoiners
32:01 What's the pitch?
39:42 Stock option wealth planning
43:20 BTC income planning
56:00 Ordinals inheritance (no.. seriously)
1:00:47 What to do with gains?
1:05:33 Planning before the gains happen
Dollarjones retweeted
Why We Aren't (S)Topping
(for my first ever long X post, I'm releasing a note I sent early this this morning to Galaxy counterparties and clients)
The sun hasn’t yet risen in NYC, but I know it will. From Galaxy HQ north of Battery Park, the Hudson River looks like a sea of black but for the occasional glow of ferry lights appearing from or receding into the darkness. But Bitcoin is awake. If you want to sleep in this market, you better not wake up for a glass of water at 3am and look at the Bitcoin price, because you’re liable to be greeted with a fat green candle that makes returning to bed difficult. BTC is trading above $59k, and apparently traded as high as $59.5k in the early hours on the Eastern seaboard of the United States.
There are reasons – if you’re reading this you probably know a lot of them. The BTC ETFs took in a whopping net $576m of BTC yesterday (Tuesday Feb. 27), with BlackRock alone seeing $520m of inflows, its largest ever day. Saylor is still buying for MSTR; Reddit is going public and said it may continue to add BTC, ETH and MATIC to its balance sheet. Fidelity Canada (different from Fidelity Investments) is recommending a 1-3% allocation. Every day we see news that another RIA platform has added support for the ETFs. A wave of new demand is smashing against a programmatically scarce asset of which 75% is held by long-term holders, many of them diamond-handed zealots forged in the fire of several volatile market cycles.
One big question I’m hearing this week – where are we in the “cycle?” Notably, Bitcoin is trading just 12.16% below its prior all-time high. Bitcoin’s 4th halving will occur in about 52 days. At this point prior to the last two halvings, BTC was still down 60%+ from its previous all-time highs. Effectively, the bull runs of 2017 and 2020 hadn’t yet begun at this stage in Bitcoin’s supply schedule.
52 days before 2nd Halving (9-JUL-16)
BTCUSD $455.22 (-59.86% from ATH)
52 days before 3rd Halving (11-MAY-20)
BTCUSD $6,174 (-68.56% from ATH)
52 days before 4th Halving (20-APR-24)
BTCUSD $59,330 (-12.16% from ATH)
Although there have only been 3 halvings, and at 15 years old Bitcoin is still young by the standards of any asset class, some have raised worry that we may be speedrunning the “cycle” this time around. I suppose the notion is that the run we’ve seen over the last year might be the bull run, and that the normal course of post-halving bullish cycle may not occur. If we make a new ATH before the expected halving date of Apr. 20, 2024, that would further exacerbate this view, some say.
I’m here to say that I don’t believe that for a second. This time is different. The advent of Bitcoin ETFs in the United States is truly a monumental shift that will disrupt everything we know about Bitcoin price cycles, how to assess holder behavior, and intra-crypto rotational dynamics. But before I get into that, here’s a pile of data that suggests we are not yet topping.
Long & Short-Term Holders
Long-term holders are still mostly holding strong, currently possessing about 75% of all BTC supply. In just the last few days, we have seen a small decline – signifying a marginal transfer of coins from long to short term hands – the magnitude is nowhere near what we’ve seen in prior cycles.
MVRV Z-Score
Another way to visualize the cyclicality of Bitcoin price action is to examine the aggregate cost basis of the Bitcoin supply. While market value (market capitalization) is calculated by multiplying the current circulating supply by the last known price, realized value (realized capitalization) sums the value of coins at the time they last moved onchain. For example, if I bought a coin for $100 in 2012 and haven’t moved it since, that coin contributes $100 to the aggregate realized market cap. If we calculate a Z-score, the ratio between the difference of market cap and realized cap, and the standard deviation off market cap, we can evaluate whether Bitcoin is overvalued or undervalued.
Futures Open Interest
While BTC futures open interest is nearing all-time highs, so too is CME’s market share at more than 25% of all OI. Whereas prior peaks coincided with market tops, those futures markets were dominated by offshore crypto-collateralized exchanges, and market participants were much less institutional. They used volatile cryptoassets as collateral, sometimes an exchange’s native token (RIP FTT), and took on crazy amounts of leverage. Today, CME dominates and traders must post cash. And you have bigmarket players now – such as the authorized participants for the Bitcoin ETFs – that are using futures to hedge rather than for leverage.
Indeed, as @dylanleclair pointed out (teapawt.net/DylanLeClair_/status/1…), the futures complex is completely different to prior cycles. The percent of crypto-margined futures open interest is “down only.”
More on leverage – shout out to Hannah Burgess who flagged this chart from @cryptoquant_com for me. The leverage ratio across exchanges is lower than it was just 2 months ago, let alone last summer. By dividing futures exchanges’ open interest by their total BTC reserves (i.e., custodied assets), you can get an idea of what user leverage. Increasing values indicate more investors taking leverage risk, while decreasing values suggest lower risk. (Image omitted due to 4-image max on X, see subsequent tweet)
Retail Interest
There’s definitely some retail interest, as exhibited by ETF inflows (more on ETFs below), but some of the toppy metrics haven’t yet rebounded. Google Trend data shows still minimal search interest, app store rankings show the retail crypto apps are not peaking as they have during prior runs, Twitter mentions are well below prior peaks, etc. (Image omitted due to 4-image max on X, see subsequent tweet)
Bitcoin ETFs
The ETFs have added assets on a net-basis over 21 of the last 22 days – and incredible feat. Yesterday was the third largest day of net inflows, and Monday was the 4th largest day. Flows appear to be accelerating, not stagnating or subsiding.
Bloomberg Intelligence (@JSeyff)
Despite incredible volumes and flows, there’s plenty of reason to believe that the Bitcoin ETF story is still just getting started. As we wrote in our October 2023 report “Sizing the Market for the Bitcoin ETF,” (galaxy.com/insights/research…) the primary net new accessible market for these vehicles are wealth managers and financial advisors, who have not had a real way to allocate client capital to Bitcoin exposure. While we are periodically seeing headlines of this or that RIA adding support for the ETFs, there is $40tn of AUM at banks and broker/dealers that has not yet turned on access. We are likely to see a constant drip of headlines over the next 3-18 months about these platforms adding access – and these won’t just be catalyzing headlines, they come with the chance of new inflows too!
US Wealth Management - By Platform Type
Broker-Dealer = $27.1tn
Bank = $11.9tn
Registered Investment Advisors = $9.3tn
Total US Wealth Management AUM = $48.3tn
Source: Galaxy Research; Data: Dakota (Oct. 2023)
In April, we will also get the first round of post-ETF-launch 13F filings, and (I’m just guessing here…) we are likely to see some huge names have allocated to Bitcoin. New platforms, new investments, and higher prices compound on each other, creating a feedback loop.
Declining Volatility
Over time, BTC’s volatility has declined, and it is likely to continue declining over time. ETF buyers, especially advisor-managed accounts, are much less likely to day trade than cryptocurrency exchange users. Said another way, if a large portion of BTC ends up inside ETFs, these assets will likely be stickier than BTC held on a crypto exchange. (Image omitted due to 4-image max on X, see subsequent tweet).
Intra-Crypto Cyclicality
That stickiness is also likely to dampen intra-crypto cyclicality. Long time crypto traders and observers will know that, historically, in bull runs BTC typically leads, then when it stagnates or tops money rotates further out the risk scale, culminating in an “altseason.” Bitcoin held on a crypto exchange can be easily swapped for Ether, and then for altcoins. But Bitcoin held in ETFs cannot be so easily swapped, nor are ETF holders – again if they are heavily comprised of advisor-managed accounts – likely to swap even if they could. The ascendancy of the Bitcoin ETFs will lower the likelihood of major intra-crypto capital rotations. And if Ether ETFs get approved, it will become increasingly difficult for other altcoins to see capital inflows relative to those two because, after all, BTC and ETH together comprise most of the capital and offer exposure to nearly all of the market narratives.
Bitcoin’s 4th Halving
Just a quick word on this. We all know that, historically, Bitcoin halvings have preceded major bull runs (usually by a few months). While the reduction from ~900 new coins to ~450 new coins per day is small in absolute terms (and relative to BTC’s daily float of $10-25bn over the past few months), nonetheless prices are set on the margin and there really aren’t many coins for sale at these prices. But beyond any supply impact – which again I believe is marginal– this will be the first halving in which major US asset managers have a marketing machine working to educate on Bitcoin, and there is no better Bitcoin education than learning about the halving. So it’s a narrative event first (a quadrennial marketing moment) and a supply event second, though I think both aspects will be impactful.
Can’t (s)top Won’t (s)top
All this is to say, my answer to that burning question – where are we in the cycle? – is that we haven’t even begun to reach the heights this is likely to go. The ETFs are genuinely a game changer and they are still just getting started. Given the flows we are seeing, both in the ETF complex and through our desk, I think it’s reasonable to see a new all-time high within a matter of weeks. We’re starting to hear Bitcoin spoken about alongside gold and treasuries as macro hedge assets – just this morning I heard a traditional finance research analyst suggesting Bitcoin is becoming a genuine “hedge to fiat debasement” on national television. Bitcoin is prime time now, and while it might be hard to believe, things are just starting to get exciting.
Alex Thorn
Head of Firmwide Research, Galaxy
New York City
Dollarjones retweeted
$HODL is going wild today with $258m in volume already, a 14x jump over its daily average, and it's not one big investor (which would make sense) but rather 32,000 individual trades, which is 60x its avg. Not sure how to explain.. maybe it was added to a platform over wknd ?
Dollarjones retweeted
It’s not just the SEC.
The Federal Reserve leads the Operation Chokepoint 2.0 crackdown on crypto.
Custodia Bank @custodiabank has sued the Fed because it failed to approved Custodia's application for a Fed "master account."
A Fed "master account" is essentially a bank account for banks, allowing banks to use the Fed system for check clearing, wire transfers and ACH payments.
Federal law requires the Fed to grant a master account to any federal or state chartered depository institution.
Custodia is a Wyoming chartered depository institution.
It usually takes 5-7 business days for the Fed to approve a master account.
Custodia waited with no response from the Fed to its master account application for 20 months.
So, Custodia was left with no option but to sue the Fed.
The Fed then denied Custodia’s application for a master account 8 months after the lawsuit was filed.
(Yes, this does sound exactly like how the SEC treated @Coinbase's petition for rulemaking.)
Custodia has turned up some fascinating details in the discovery it has conducted against the Kansas City Fed and the main Fed in DC.
A tangled web indeed:
In connection with Custodia's application for a master account, the Kansas City Fed conducted a comprehensive examination of Custodia and submitted its Report of findings to the main Fed in DC.
What happened with that Report tells you all you need to know about how our government is treating crypto.
Capital
After a comprehensive investigation, the Kansas City Fed's Report concluded that Custodia’s capital was “adequate.”
Without any additional investigation, the Fed in DC changed the Report to say there was a “lack of a robust capital requirement framework” at Custodia.
Risk Management
The Kansas City Fed concluded that Custodia had “strong risk management” practices.
The Fed in DC changed the Report to say there were “significant risk management gaps.”
Liquidity
The Kansas City Fed concluded that “liquidity risk was relatively low” at Custodia.
This makes sense because, unlike banks that use a "fractional reserve" business model to lend out deposits, Custodia uses a "fully reserved" model--meaning it retains liquid reserves covering over 100% of the deposits it takes in.
Notwithstanding its hyper-conservative liquidity model, the Fed in DC changed the Report to say there were “insufficient liquidity risk management processes” at Custodia.
Management Experience
The Kansas City Fed concluded that the experience of Custodia's management team was “impressive” and “extensive.”
The Fed in DC changed the Report to say there was a “lack of collective depth of relevant banking experience” at Custodia.
The Report, “revised” by the Fed in DC to say the opposite of what the Kansas City Fed had concluded, was used as the basis for denying Custodia's application for a master account.
It is obvious from the documents uncovered in discovery that the process was rigged because the Fed objected to Custodia’s plan to provide banking and digital asset services to individuals and businesses involved in crypto.
To their credit, the @BlockchainAssn and the Attorney General of Wyoming filed amicus briefs in support of Custodia's recent motion for summary judgment.
Fighting the Fed is the quintessential David v. Goliath battle.
Fortunately, Caitlyn Long @CaitlinLong_ the CEO of Custodia, is a fighter.
But Caitlin is not just fighting for Custodia,
she is fighting for all of crypto and the principle of financial freedom.


































