Iburey

🚨Breaking : MACL MD Shareef MACL ga ulhey 19 aharuge kuhjakaa hithaa vegen hulhule island hotel ga abadhu onnany dhemeehun boi gen mihaaru. MD Shareef akee reyeh dhuvaaleh nubalaa Raa Boa meehe kamah mauloomaathu libijje. Anyone who has more details can send to me.

Maldives is having an obese crisis. We need sugar tax asap @MMuizzu

Why are our foreign diplomats so fat? It’s fat fucks every where. Fat foreign minister. Fat health minister. These people need a treadmill.

Mi dhen kaaku tha? Meena mi pnc ge verikan gennan masakai kuri meeheh tha? Zionist agenda genesgen mi ulhenee? @hkuri

HDC has lost public confidence and its continued existence in its present form is increasingly difficult to justify. HDC needs to be shut down. Its essential services must continue, its employees must be reduced, and its responsibilities must be reorganised under a more transparent and accountable system. @MMuizzu @HKurusee @Midhuamsaud

ޕީޖީ ލީޑަރު ފަލާހު މިއަދު ހުކުރަ ނުގޮސް ދިޔަތަން އެގޭ މީހަކު އެބަހުރިތޯ؟ @HKurusee

President @MMuizzu, before a promise reaches your microphone, whose assessment confirms that it can actually be delivered? On 3 August, Parliament questioned whether your six-month deadlines for water and sewerage projects in B. Kihaadhoo and B. Kudarikilu had technical backing. According to RaajjeMV’s report, Minister Muththalib acknowledged that the projects remained unfinished but did not identify the assessment supporting those deadlines. On 10 August, Adhadhu reported—and shared on X—that you had challenged ministers over stalled projects and financing. That account relies on unnamed Cabinet sources, so it does not establish what ministers privately told you. But it raises a question: what information was reaching you before those public commitments were made? Were funds actually available, or still being negotiated? Had procurement, contractor capacity and technical requirements been checked? Did ministers and SOE heads recommend those deadlines, or were the deadlines set before their assessments were complete? When obstacles emerged, who reported them—and when? Personal trust, party loyalty and academic qualifications cannot establish whether a particular project is ready for delivery. That requires project-specific evidence: financing, an executable schedule, the necessary approvals and people assigned to complete the work. There are several possible explanations for a missed commitment: inaccurate advice, insufficient funding, implementation problems, changed circumstances or a deadline adopted despite technical warnings. They assign responsibility differently. Neither automatically blaming ministers nor automatically shielding them establishes what happened. Will the administration publish the original commitments, the advice behind them, the responsible ministers and SOE heads, and progress against each milestone? That record could also explain which operational problems reached the presidency and why they were not resolved at the level originally responsible. The question is not only who announced the promise. It is who advised, who verified, who implemented—and what each knew at the time.

Salhi