Dale Staten (@Dstat_THR) header
Dale Staten (@Dstat_THR) profile picture

Father - Husband - USAF vet - Tobacco Harm Reduction Consumer Advocate - 13 yrs smoke-free - An informed nobody - Ask me about #SaferNicotine #vapingsaveslives

Portland, Maine
Joined September 2009
Photo by Dale Staten (@Dstat_THR)Photo by Dale Staten (@Dstat_THR)Photo by Dale Staten (@Dstat_THR)Photo by Dale Staten (@Dstat_THR)Photo by Dale Staten (@Dstat_THR)Photo by Dale Staten (@Dstat_THR)Photo by Dale Staten (@Dstat_THR)Photo by Dale Staten (@Dstat_THR)Photo by Dale Staten (@Dstat_THR)Photo by Dale Staten (@Dstat_THR)
Dale Staten retweeted
It’s interesting watching @FDATobacco be in this really awkward position of trying to communicate to adult smokers that vaping can drastically improve their life, while also turning to those under 21, trying to tell them that Vaping will ruin their life
The question is: What will @FDA do now? Authorize #SaferNicotine alternatives based on objective evidence for "substantial equivalence"? Who opposes doing that? @BloombergDotOrg and its grantees @AmericanCancer Society @American_Heart Association American @LungAssociation
4
12
1
57
3,007
Replying to @KYWNewsradio
So many people are quitting smoking that there's not enough money to help smokers quit? Forgive me for saying, but that's a profoundly stupid observation. ALL states are heavily dependent on cigarette sin taxes to pad their budgets. ALL stint on smoking cessation funding.
3
6
39
432
Dale Staten retweeted
Adding a thought here, respectfully: The risk differential is real and well-established: * Cigarettes involve combustion → thousands of toxic chemicals * Noncombustible products → substantially reduced exposure to those toxicants Many people misunderstand or underestimate how large the difference actually is. For the many smokers who can’t or don’t want to quit nicotine — which does not cause the illnesses and deaths resulting from smoking — it isn’t about both cigarettes and vapes being “bad,” but about moving down the well-established continuum of risk to an option that is much safer. Many members of the armed services — I see you’re a proud Navy vet (thank you) — do exactly this for very good reasons. I hope that helps.
7
1
24
877
Dale Staten retweeted
Replying to @AnakLolina2
Can you point out where any of these former or current @FDATobacco employees including @DrMakaryFDA are incorrect?
3
5
1
18
1,095
After all these years they still keep repeating the same old debunked arguments. There are countless community notes on all the issues raised in this article but i guess it pulls in clicks
4
11
171
Dale Staten retweeted
“Too commonly, vaping is still viewed as something dangerous that should not be used as a smoking cessation tool – in fact the opposite is true.”
expert reaction to systematic review of ecigs for stopping smoking sciencemediacentre.org/exper…
7
18
290
Replying to @nypost
Your little article contains health misinformation about relative risks. According to the @US_FDA, such misinformation reduces smoking cessation. And there is no longer any question about this: Nicotine vapes are much safer and help people quit smoking. So please #QuitLying.
1
10
35
334
6/ Bottom line: The consistency across meta-analyses is striking—nicotine e-cigs can help people quit smoking. The challenge now is how to use this evidence responsibly in policy and practice. 📄 Open access: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/… @Oxford_TAG
2
7
3
29
2,191
Dale Staten retweeted
"There were no significant differences found in cardiovascular disease occurrence for exclusive e-cigarette users compared to nonusers of any tobacco product." digitalscholar.lsuhsc.edu/cg…
9
2
28
725
Dale Staten retweeted
Evidence 🧵 2010 Nicotine vaping avoids combustion (the main source of smoking harm), early peer-reviewed lab work comparing cigarette smoke vs e-cig aerosol characteristics “Conventional and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have different smoking characteristics” academic.oup.com/ntr/article… 2011 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (harm reduction framing supported by the then-available evidence base) “Electronic Cigarettes as a Harm Reduction Strategy for Tobacco Control: A Step Forward or a Repeat of Past Mistakes” vaportechnology.org/wp-conte… 2012 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (measured indoor-air pollutants far lower vs cigarette smoke) “Comparison of the effects of e-cigarette vapor and cigarette smoke on indoor air quality” articles.researchsolutions.c… 2013 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (cigarette smoke extract far more cytotoxic than e-cig vapor extract in vitro) “Cytotoxicity evaluation of electronic cigarette vapor extract… comparison with tobacco cigarette smoke extract” gwern.net/doc/nicotine/2013-… 2014 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (key toxicants measured much lower in vapor vs smoke) “Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes” tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/conte… 2015 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (TSNAs are minimal in e-cig liquid/aerosol; plus “dry puff” conditions matter for aldehydes) “Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines in Electronic Cigarettes: Comparison between Liquid and Aerosol Levels” mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/8/9046 2016 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (broad toxicant panel shows dramatically lower emissions vs cigarette smoke) “Chemical Composition of Aerosol from an E-Cigarette: A Quantitative Comparison with Cigarette Smoke” pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021… 2017 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (biomarkers of carcinogens/toxins far lower in long-term exclusive vapers vs smokers) “Nicotine, Carcinogen, and Toxin Exposure in Long-Term E-Cigarette and Nicotine Replacement Therapy Users” discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprin… 2018 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (switching studies show toxicant biomarkers fall quickly when smokers switch) “Biomarkers of Tobacco Exposure Decrease After Smokers Switch to an E-Cigarette or Nicotine Gum” academic.oup.com/ntr/article… 2019 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (population biomarker data: exclusive e-cig users show markedly lower toxicant exposure vs smokers) “Comparison of Nicotine and Toxicant Exposure in Users of Electronic Cigarettes and Cigarettes” jamanetwork.com/journals/jam… 2020 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (comparative chemistry reviews continue to show substantially lower toxicant emissions vs cigarettes) “The Evolving E-cigarette: Comparative Chemical Analyses of E-cigarette Aerosols” frontiersin.org/journals/tox… 2021 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (fewer compounds + lower concentrations in e-cig aerosol vs cigarette smoke) “The Chemical Complexity of e-Cigarette Aerosols Compared With the Smoke from a Tobacco Burning Cigarette” frontiersin.org/journals/che… 2022 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (24-week randomized clinical trial: exposure/potential-harm biomarkers improve after switching) “Biomarkers of Exposure and Biomarkers of Potential Harm… in a 24-week, Randomized, Clinical Trial” academic.oup.com/ntr/article… 2023 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (real-world biomarker comparisons: smokers highest; exclusive ENDS lower) “Comparison of biomarkers of exposure among US adult smokers, ENDS users, dual users and nonusers, 2018–2019” nature.com/articles/s41598-0… 2024 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (systematic review/meta-analysis: TSNA exposure is far higher in smokers than exclusive vapers) “Exposure to Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines Among People Who Vape, Smoke, or do Neither: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” academic.oup.com/ntr/article… 2025 Nicotine vaping is less harmful than continuing to smoke (comparative emissions synthesis: TSNAs lower in e-cig aerosol than cigarette smoke) “Tobacco-specific nitrosamine exposure from electronic cigarettes versus combustible cigarettes” frontiersin.org/journals/onc… When does, 'not enough evidence yet' stop being cautionary and turn into denial? 16 years of evidence on any product other than nicotine would have been policy already. #Science
6
27
4
81
3,690
Dale Staten retweeted
After 16 years, my @YouTube channel (GrimmGreen) was terminated today with no real explanation. I’ve built my content around harm reduction, helping adult smokers quit, and advocating for science-based policies. This feels like a huge mistake. If you believe in THR, free speech, and the mission we’ve been on, please help me get YouTube’s attention. @TeamYouTube I’m asking for a real human to review my case. I’ve never promoted anything illegal. I’ve never targeted youth. I’ve worked tirelessly to be a responsible voice in the vaping and harm reduction space. But like many creators in this space, it seems I’ve been swept up in an overly aggressive moderation wave.
456
580
148
2,443
234,448
To everyone in the global tobacco harm-reduction community. Consumers, advocates, scientists, independent researchers, frontline vape-shop professionals, and policy experts. Thank you! Your commitment, your evidence-driven voices, and your refusal to give up on safer alternatives have changed lives. You’ve stood up against misinformation, stigma, and policy environments that too often ignore the lived experiences of people who have actually made the switch. This music video is dedicated to you, the people pushing for a future where fewer families are harmed by smoking, and where adults have access to tools that genuinely work. But the mission is far from over. Millions still smoke, and far too many are making decisions in an environment clouded by misinformation. When the truth about safer alternatives is distorted or hidden, people are left without the knowledge they need to make informed, potentially life-changing choices. And while the consequences fall on individuals and families, the conversations and policies shaping these choices often exclude the voices of those most affected. If you’ve switched from cigarettes to a reduced-harm product, or you know someone who has, please share this post. Help us amplify real stories, real science, and real hope. The more people who hear it, the more lives we can change. Let’s keep moving forward. The work continues, and so does our collective impact.
4
31
6
56
2,891
Like this peer-reviewed academic (non-industry) evidence? 1) Cancer risk plummets when smokers switch to e-cigarettes Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR) drops >10,000-fold. sciencedirect.com/science/ar… A more conservative estimate found lifetime cancer risk drops 99.5% (0.5% risk would be difficult to measure; difficult to distinguish from “background noise”) tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/conte… Use of nicotine vapes significantly reduces exposure to a major pulmonary carcinogen, NNAL (results of 4-arm, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial funded by US NIH and FDA) thelancet.com/journals/lanre… Review of previous studies shows switching from cigarettes to nicotine vapes lowers risk of head and neck cancer. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3316… Excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) from e-cigarettes is “five orders of magnitude lower than that of mainstream traditional cigarette smoke, and also lower than the guideline values defined by EPA and WHO.” In other words, if cancer risk from smoking is 100%, then cancer risk from nicotine vapes is 0.001%. sciencedirect.com/science/ar… “The preponderance of [e-cigarette] products having [cancer] potencies <1% of tobacco smoke.” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2877… “NNAL exposure among youth who vape [nicotine] is much lower than among those who smoke and indistinguishable from youth who do not vape or smoke.” Note: 77% of those youth vapers were using disposable vapes. tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/conte… 2) Cardiovascular health improves when smokers switch to ecigs According to the American Heart Association, smokers who switch to nicotine vaping have a 7-fold lower risk of stroke; their heart health biomarkers are indistinguishable from never-smokers; and they have a 30%-40% lower risk of cardiovascular events than people who continue to smoke. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article… ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/… ahajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1… Systematic review and meta-analysis of 63 studies: “...short-to-medium-term transition from cigarettes to e-cigarettes may improve blood flow and blood pressure... There is lack of evidence supporting any association of e-cigarette use with cardiovascular diseases and cardiac dysfunction or remodelling." Exclusive vapers had no significant differences in heart rate (HR) or blood pressure (BP) compared with non-users, and lower HR and BP than smokers. heart.bmj.com/content/early/… They “experienced positive cardiovascular impact after both a 3- and 6-month period” including significant improvement in flow-mediated dilation, peak cutaneous vascular conductance responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside, and mean arterial pressure. These benefits were exactly the same for e-cigarettes and NRTs. bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.co… “We did not find a significant difference in the cardiovascular risk of exclusive e-cigarette use compared with nonuse of cigarettes and e-cigarettes.” [i.e., nicotine vapers’ cardiovascular risk is indistinguishable from non-smokers and non-vapers.] Study funded by NIH & FDA. ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/… Exclusive use of nicotine vapes (“e-cigarettes”) was not associated with a statistically significant increased risk of self-reported incidents of diagnosed cardiovascular disease over a 5-year period, whereas exclusive cigarette smoking is. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3590…; academic.oup.com/ntr/advance… Smoking cessation showed positive cardiovascular impact within 3 days, and the effects did not differ between nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and nicotine replacement therapies (e.g., nicotine patch or nicotine gum). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3590…; and academic.oup.com/ntr/advance… 1,179 heart attack patients followed for 41.7 months. 710 participants who smoked at baseline, but switched to e-cigarettes over the next year, had 57% lower odds of subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events compared to those who continued smoking (11.4% vs. 22.3%). sciencedirect.com/science/ar… Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and blood pressure control, improve, and significant weight gains associated with cold turkey smoking cessation do not occur. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2784… Blood vessel health improves significantly jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.… nature.com/articles/s41569-0… sciencedirect.com/science/ar… sciencedirect.com/science/ar… 3) Lung health improves when smokers switch to e-cigarettes Lung cilia recover full function (these cilia remove solid particulates, bacteria and fungal spores from healthy lungs; cigarettes damage lung cilia function). ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article… Respiratory tract infections drop dramatically dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/… Longitudinal analysis of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, an observational cohort study that surveyed 5,653 US adults ≥18 years, shows “Switching completely from past 30-day use of cigarettes to e-cigarettes had short-term beneficial associations with functionally important respiratory symptoms similar to quitting tobacco completely.” sciencedirect.com/science/ar… thelancet.com/journals/eclin… They have 20% less cough and 30% less phlegm than smokers who quit with nicotine patches or gum. nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/ne… Data from 9,000 adults aged ≥ 16 years: “Exclusive e-cigarette use was not associated with higher odds of wheezing compared with never-use, and it was linked to substantially lower odds than exclusive cigarette smoking.” link.springer.com/article/10… Analysis of 19,000 people found 65% of smokers with asthma and 76% of smokers with COPD reported improvement in respiratory symptoms after switching to ecigs. mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/4/4356… COPD smokers’ lung health and quality of life improve dramatically (participants followed for 5 years). “COPD exacerbations were reduced by approximately 50% in patients who stopped or considerably reduced their smoking consumption after switching to vaping.” ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article… Asthmatic smokers experience “Significant improvement in asthma control and quality of life” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3196… pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2701… mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/5/4965 discoverymedicine.com/Riccar… mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/905… What about never-smokers who vape nicotine? 'No detectable changes in lung health' of never-smokers who vaped nicotine for up to 4 years nature.com/articles/s41598-0… Studies that looked at both cardiovascular and lung health: 2022 review by University of Michigan researchers: When smokers switch, risk of acute cardiopulmonary events drops rapidly; long-term use leads to lung health benefits, especially among asthmatic and COPD smokers. No cancer risk found. mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/905… E-cigarette users who never smoked, followed for 3.5 years: No significant health changes in blood pressure, heart rate, body weight, lung function, respiratory symptoms, exhaled breath nitric oxide or carbon monoxide; and “no pathological findings could be identified on high-resolution computed tomography of the lungs, and no respiratory symptoms were consistently reported in the e-cigarette user group.” nature.com/articles/s41598-0… E-cigarette users’ health biomarkers are indistinguishable from never-smokers. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) are Harmful or Potentially Harmful Substances (HPHS) measured at high levels in smokers. “When compared with people who never smoked, E-cigarette smokers [sic] had similar blood concentrations of VOCs.” archpublichealth.biomedcentr… In adult COPD smokers: “Diastolic blood pressure and airway resistance improved after e-cigarette use.” (short term study) psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?d…
3
4
26
290
Now served with a community note. teapawt.net/drkaanyl/status/199847….
unavailable
1
11
21
984
This is an EXCELLENT, up-to-date, evidence-based summary of the health effects of nicotine (2 pages +1p of references) and I recommend it to everyone interested in this topic. ash.org.uk/uploads/ASH-evide…
5
24
5
45
2,796
Now served with a community note.
In November, we bring awareness to the leading cause of cancer deaths in Ontario – lung cancer. Last year, I rose in the House to speak on this important topic, and the health risks that vaping can have on young people. Since then, our government has enacted a ban on vaping in schools and required the existing curriculum to educate students on its dangers.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
1
11
1
26
933
The real merchants of death were in the room at #FCTCCOP11 trying to prevent a billion people having access to products that will radically reduce their disease risks, ignoring the adolescents who take up smoking every day, denying the harmful effects of war-on-drugs prohibitions, presenting unworkable and unethical policies, spreading misinformation and doubt, exploiting young people for campaign tactics, getting high on infantile billionaire-funded activism - above all, wasting opportunities to do something useful while protecting the cigarette trade. A macabre spectacle of arrogance and ineptitude, displaying utter indifference to human pain and suffering. Its participants deserve far greater scrutiny. clivebates.com/is-tobacco-co…
An old evil song of merchants of death clothed in the garments of lies and deception. Their words are flavoured just like the poisons they market. Their sadistic goal is to destroy a whole generation by recruiting young people and children into addiction. Very heartless preditors
2
42
3
86
3,504
Now served with a community note.
Richard Hogan: Vaping is not a healthy alternative to smoking — full stop irishexaminer.com/lifestyle/…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Vaping is a healthier alternative to smoking. Richard Hogan is the one spreading misinformation. rcp.ac.uk/policy-and-cam… gov.uk/government/pub… tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/23/2/1… nap.edu/resource/24952… cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_… Interviews with the researchers from King’s College London about their OHID report. x.com/KingsIoPPN/sta…
2
17
1
37
1,331
My good friend @phil_w888 posted dozens of studies showing 'flavor' prohibitions increase use of deadly cigarettes, esp. among young adults. (own-goal for Tobacco Control) What about e-cigarette taxes? Coercive taxes imposed to protect teens. Do they? @mikepesko THREAD 👇
5
29
6
49
3,437