Pinned Tweet
Two big drops. ๐
ElevenLabs is now inside Magai.
Speech. Music. Sound effects.
Use the models directly. Or have your agent use them for you.
One prompt. One voiceover, one soundtrack, one sound effect. All in the same chat as everything else.
That's drop one.
Drop two is bigger.
Unlimited image and video generation. โฌ
We added a small selection of image and video models that don't touch your monthly usage.
Generate as much as you want. Zero meter running.
Most people ration their credits. They hesitate. They second-guess the prompt because every try costs something.
That's how you get average work. ๐ซ
Iteration is the whole game. Ten bad drafts to get one great one. Now you can afford to make all ten. โ
Finding them takes one click.
Open the model select menu. Hit the "Unlimited" filter. Done.
Here's the catch.
Right now, every Magai user has access.
Soon, it moves to Pro and Ultra subscribers only.
The window is open. Go use it. ๐
Voice, music, sound effects, images, video. Every major AI. One place.
Stop paying for five tools.
Start making things.
More than 60% of software companies plan to launch usage billing within 12 months.
Fewer than 10% of organizations can manage it today.
Fixing a billing stack that fails after go-live: $1M to $5M or more. (MGI Research, March 2026)
That's not a roadmap. It's a dare. ๐
Cap gaming is a pricing smell.
When a customer deletes three projects a month to stay on the cheaper plan, they're doing unpaid admin to avoid paying you.
Your cap is sitting on the wrong unit.
Move it to something they'd be happy to outgrow. โ
Notion bills per member. Then $10 per 1,000 credits for agents.
Two meters, because seats can't measure how much the software did on its own.
As software does more of the work, the bill follows the work. Smart. Just keep it to two numbers a buyer can hold in their head. ๐
Billing usage by "runs" sounds fair.
Then a run fails three times and the invoice shows three.
Bill per completed task. Count retries as zero. Same month of activity, a number the buyer recognizes.
The unit is half the pricing work. Pick it before you pick the price.
Which pricing model are you on?
A. Flat rate
B. Tiers
C. Per seat
D. Usage
E. Free tier with a wall
Drop your letter. Then tell me which part your best customer would change. ๐
Test a pricing change on real accounts first.
$29 flat becomes $19 plus $0.004 a unit.
Median account, 1,800 units: $26.20.
Heavy account, 9,000 units: $55.
That's the account you were subsidizing.
Ask any model who pays more and who walks. Check the math by hand. ๐
Per seat has a quiet failure.
Your customer signs 20 seats. Hiring stops for three quarters. Revenue from that account goes flat. Your support load doesn't.
Worse, their team stops inviting the contractor because every invite costs money.
You made your own product smaller.
Founder: Our pricing is simple.
Customer: So it's $19 a month?
Founder: Base fee, plus seats, plus credits, plus a support tier.
Customer: Can we get on a call?
Founder: That's the idea. ๐
One question picks your pricing model.
Does your heaviest customer get 10x the value of your lightest one?
Yes: bill for the gap.
No: seats or tiers. Easier to explain.
Not "what do competitors charge." That's the wrong question. โ
Your pricing page isn't a price list.
It's a guess about how your customer's bill should grow.
Most founders make that guess by copying a company four stages ahead.
Then wonder why their buyer can't explain the price to a colleague. ๐ซ
AI can write ten button variants in ten seconds.
That's the trap. ๐ซ
Ten versions of the wrong placement is still the wrong placement.
Use the speed to run more tests. Not to generate more options. โ
The 20 minute CTA sheet. Fill it in for one page ๐
Goal.
Benchmark.
Placement.
Button.
Destination headline.
The day you read the result.
No tools. In a week you'll know a number about your page instead of a feeling about it.
Three buttons of equal size.
Start a trial. Join the newsletter. Book a demo.
That's not a page. It's a buffet.
The reader came hungry and left with nothing on the plate.
Use AI as the skeptic, not the copywriter.
Paste in your page goal, your button, and where it sits.
Ask: "Give me five reasons a cold visitor would not click this."
Fix the top two. Then test. ๐
The ad says "first month free."
The page says "plans from $29."
You didn't lose that click on the button. You lost it on the promise. ๐ซ
Fix the promise before you touch the design. It needs no test to find. โ
Honest question.
What's the weakest button on your site right now?
A. "Submit"
B. "Learn more"
C. "Click here"
D. It's fine, it's just buried at the bottom
Drop your letter. ๐
Most tests don't win.
About 1 in 8 produces a statistically significant improvement.
That's not failure. A flat result tells you the button was never the problem.
Learning to love "no difference" is half the job.
A/B test results are in.
Variant A: 3 clicks.
Variant B: 5 clicks.
Total visitors: 80.
Founder: "B wins. Shipping it." ๐
Statistics: "Please sit down."
A button that converts has four parts ๐
1. A verb they perform
2. An object they receive
3. A person it belongs to
4. A number or a deadline
"Submit" fails all four.
"Start my 14-day trial" passes all four.




