Tired of nonsense, let's just get legislation passed.

Joined March 2009
Eliz Rosen retweeted
Replying to @AmIsraelChai_
Zionism is Jewish self-defense in their ancestral homeland. The days of Jews apologizing for fighting back against jihad are over.
1
13
121
RT @CoreyWriting: Progressives believe they understand the working class and that working class people can be politically activated by offe…
6
1
Eliz Rosen retweeted
Lots of people are asking me where to give their money - if you can only do one race, I’d give what you can to @MaryPeltola Several reasons: 1) It’s a small state, so your money goes further per expected senate vote 2) Direct donations buy 19x ads per dollar than committees due to the unit rule - this also frees up the DSCC and SMP to put their money on states with smaller IE/coord ad price spreads and frees them up to spend more on digital 3) it’s likely going to be close! It’s not too late! Any money you send today will get spent immediately and will provide real relief to an overworked campaign workers across a bunch of orgs! secure.actblue.com/donate/mp…
29
145
15
747
161,238
Eliz Rosen retweeted
The shoe was on the other foot and leftists did much worse
If the shoe had been on the other foot, and a progressive had given this kind of answer, they would be getting savaged now by the likes of Neera Tanden.
10
116
7
1,028
11,224
At a recent event where I spoke at a community center, a group of “pro-Palestine” militiamen appeared outside to protest and disrupt the event, along with agitated older white women who entered the venue to do the same on the inside. The organizers and I had arranged extensive security because these same “activists” had spent days trying to get the event canceled and openly vowed to do whatever they could to stop it from happening. As I walked in, a few masked “activists” in keffiyehs whispered, "is this the genocide guy?" I turned to them and said, "hi gentlemen, thanks for coming." One replied, "Free Palestine." I responded, "I agree, including from Hamas." Once I began speaking, several disruptors engaged in a steady stream of whispering, side conversations, eye-rolling, posturing, and juvenile antics. I stopped and asked one of the women why she and her comrades were behaving like children. She admitted she knew nothing about me or my work but felt qualified to declare that if I were truly Palestinian, my Nakba-surviving grandparents would be rolling in their graves. I asked the agitators to be respectful, explaining that while security could remove them, I would rather they listen to what I actually had to say, instead of relying on misinformation spread about me by the local DSA, BDS, and other "pro-Palestine" groups. What enraged me most was their reaction when I spoke about my family in Gaza, the relatives we have lost to Israeli airstrikes during the post-October 7 war, and the destruction of both my childhood homes. These white “activists” laughed and smirked as I described some of the most painful experiences of my life and the sense of personal loss that inspires my work. They showed shocking indifference toward the very Palestinians on whose behalf they claim to be acting. I confronted some of the disruptors directly and asked why they get to define what it means to be "pro-Palestine," despite knowing nothing about me and showing no interest in the trauma my family has endured. Some stormed out shouting "Free Palestine." Others fell silent. One person, despite strongly disagreeing with me, acknowledged that my views were rooted in personal loss and genuine concern for my people and shook my hand before leaving. On my way out, a pseudo-journalist known for glorifying Hamas and "the resistance" tried to ambush me with questions about whether I was paid by weapons manufacturers, oil companies, or, as he brilliantly misstated it, the "Arab Union Emirates." It struck me how absurd it is that I needed three heavily armed security officers and a bodyguard simply to speak about healing and reconciliation between Palestinians and Israelis, the dangers of extremism for both societies, the catastrophic damage Hamas has inflicted on the Palestinian national project, and the right of Palestinians to freedom, safety, and prosperity alongside a secure Israel.
🤖 Made with AI
169
1,173
83
6,208
181,607
Eliz Rosen retweeted
You just gave a million dollars to Abdul.
Elon Musk and his fellow billionaires think they can buy our democracy. They are wrong. Together, we will defeat oligarchy.
27
203
14
1,496
9,669
“We are proving that Mamdani is not a one-hit wonder.” “He is part of a larger movement of power-building that we have been doing.” Linda Sarsour says El-Sayed’s race will reveal “how much power we have.” She’s already looking at 2028, and naming Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand. Watch her lay out the bigger plan.
132
321
77
510
42,954
Eliz Rosen retweeted
This is the UNRWA teacher who was interviewed by the New York Post earlier this week. She was threatened by her colleagues after she challenged their teachings that she claims promoted violence against Jews.
BREAKING: Brave UNRWA teacher in Gaza speaks out against the culture of death being cultivated in the schools. Teachers around her are “aggressively pushing” ideologies of killing and violence onto their students. (Source: @JusoorNews) Will @UNLazzarini be held to account?
13
179
3
772
12,761
"There’s a stronger response to El-Sayed’s 'Why are you asking me?' jiu-jitsu, and it goes like this:"--Today's newsletter in full.
22
121
9
897
65,708
Eliz Rosen retweeted
🚨 NEW: For the @WSJ, @Hartz_PhD and I expose the ideological takeover of the American Psychological Association. The APA is facing the possible loss of its federal accreditation authority following allegations of widespread antisemitism. But while the APA's antisemitism problem is serious, it's only a symptom of a much deeper ideological rot. The organization has become so captured by radical left-wing political activism that its commitment to scientific objectivity competence is now in serious doubt. We examined the program for this year's major APA Division 39 conference, which drew nearly 800 attendees and held 90 panels over four days. By our count, roughly 70 of the 90 panels were overtly political, and always left-wing. Topics included abolishing the family, queer anarchist psychoanalysis, dismantling gender assessment guidelines, and white supremacy. One session even concluded with a drag show. There was at least some hope that the threat of losing federal accreditation might prompt some institutional soul-searching. It didn't. Instead, APA members just elected Candice Hargons as their next president. Her campaign identifies "systemic intersectional oppression" as the profession's "common enemy" and calls for rejecting the traditional scientific notions of objectivity. Psychologists wield enormous influence over vulnerable patients, and the people seeking treatment deserve the peace of mind knowing that the care they're receiving care is evidence based and not tainted radical politics. We believe most would agree that federal accreditation should actually mean something. If the APA cannot distinguish its scientific mission from its political activism, the Education Department should reconsider whether it deserves the government's endorsement as an authority over psychological training. Read our full essay in the Wall Street Journal below: 🔗wsj.com/opinion/the-inmates-…
118
919
113
3,492
119,565
Eliz Rosen retweeted
Replying to @CJPME @CalgaryOpera
As an opera singer, I am qualified to say that you absolutely do not have the right to inject your own political beliefs into a performance that the public expects to be treated as the composer intended. It is extremely disrespectful to the paying audience, and your professional colleagues. He should never work in any house ever again.
132
252
6
11,049
84,733
Eliz Rosen retweeted
Replying to @YasMohammedxx
Art is political... When it's ur own stage When he is paid to do a job, he is paid to do that one job These people are nuts
1
1
56
3,931
Eliz Rosen retweeted
This is grotesque. Absolutely grotesque. Her argument is that it was a hate crime but it's Israel's fault. So the only way to stop hate crimes against Jews in America is by supporting her preferred outcome in Israel. This is why Jews feel like DSA candidates make them unsafe.
DSA candidate Melat Kiros responded to criticism for not calling an attack on an Oct. 7 hostage-support demonstration in Colorado an act of antisemitism. “I think whether it was antisemitic or anti-Zionist, it was a hate crime.” 🎧 #TheConversation: politi.co/4B9muEp
11
27
213
6,840
Eliz Rosen retweeted
This is the kind of answer that I would’ve thought nailed it before October 7 and before I started spending a lot of time around Jews and Israelis. First of all, I think a lot of Americans on the right and the left don’t understand a full on assault on Gaza would’ve happened no matter who was in charge on October 8th. Blaming this on Bibi is a cop out. Second, it’s just a lie that Israel has acted out of proportion. That’s why the population of Gaza has grown. That’s why Israel literally sacrificed thousands of their own soldiers to knock on the doors of buildings and ask people to leave before hitting them. Thirdly, I think a lot of non-Jews kind of separate the Jewish community and Israel in their minds, but that’s not how most Jews who were active in their Judaism think about it. Fourthly, this is politically incorrect, but a lot progressives might technically be Jews, but are disconnected from Judaism and Jewish public life. They have views that are wildly out of step with the Jews that do you have deep ties to their community. It might be politically convenient for Democrats to listen to them, but it certainly not representative. It’s not hard to get a better perspective on all of this. Jews will tell you what they really think if they trust you. The problem is for most Americans they’ve become convinced you don’t want to listen so they avoid the subject.
James Talarico: "I know that October 7th was the deadliest day for the jewish people since the Holocaust. And I believe that Israel, like any nation, has a right to defend its people. But I don't believe that Benjamin Netanyahu has a right to wage war against civilians, or use collective punishment, or restrict aid to civilians."
120
144
13
1,301
105,277
It’s horrifying how quickly the Democratic Party has turned on Jews. It started before 10/7 but Hamas’s attack accelerated it.
Wild... Obama actually ran this ad in 2012 on his support for Israel
10
81
483
7,810
This is Gaza’s border with Egypt, where Abdul El-Sayed has dual citizenship. Why does Egypt get to have a a border wall but Abdul supports open borders, unlimited mass immigration and amnesty for illegals in America?
681
6,903
265
19,505
269,083
Eliz Rosen retweeted
It’s not that they care more about Israel It’s that they are terrified for their survival in America. If you don’t get that, you have no damn clue what you’re talking about. Educate yourself.
If 70% of Jews in Michigan are voting against a Muslim because they care more about Israel than their own country; or more than about grocery, gas and healthcare prices; then that’s on them and they’ll reap what the sow
26
64
3
574
7,092
I don’t know the first thing about Ed Sheeran besides the fact that he hired a really talented friend of mine to open for him after that friend faced a terrible family tragedy. So I always assumed he was a stand up guy. With the exception of Finneas and Lukas Graham, the openers who canceled (and even his band) aren't artists with mainstream careers. And even Finneas doesn't have remotely the same profile as a solo artist. For all of them, opening for Ed in stadiums was an extraordinary platform. And they canceled for what? To stand in solidarity with a guy with a history of disgusting antisemitic performances who has turned the Israel / Palestinian conflict into performative political theater? This is so basic but something none of these jokers get: it is possible to care about a resolution to the conflict without endorsing antisemitism. You can advocate for Palestinians without demonizing Jews or Israel. “Free Palestine” has become a shield for behavior that would be recognized as blatantly antisemitic if it were directed at almost any other minority. People can say they’re criticizing a government while making sweeping statements about Jews. They celebrate or excuse people who glorify violence against Jews. They erase Jewish history, deny Jewish connection to Israel, apply standards to Israel that they don’t apply anywhere else, and repeat conspiratorial tropes about Jews, all while insisting that none of it is antisemitic because they’re apparently just “advocating for Palestinians.” That isn’t solidarity with Palestinians. It is using Palestinians as a pretext for hostility toward Jews. And it hasn’t helped Palestinians, it isn’t helping Palestinians, and it won’t help Palestinians.
281
326
24
2,739
223,944
Eliz Rosen retweeted
Some numbers tell a dispositive story. 1939: 40 million Arabs in the world. 2026: 450 million Arabs in the world 1939: 17 million Jews in the world. 2026: 16 million Jews in the world 1939: 4 sovereign Arab states 2026: 22 sovereign Arab states 1939: 0 sovereign Jewish states. 2026: 1 sovereign Jewish state Tell me again what the argument is about.
369
2,722
106
11,301
333,549
Is Hamas Becoming a Global Identity Vehicle? Support for Hamas has morphed into a transnational phenomenon that is not just about being “pro-Palestine.” Instead, Hamas and what it represents have become a form of rebellious identity expression and a vessel for a sprawling mix of grievances: ideological, economic, cultural, and psychological. Its jihadist violence is being repackaged as a catch‑all outlet for anti‑Western, anti‑capitalist, anti‑white, and antisemitic politics. Whether it is leftism or Islamism, the “resistance” narrative that Hamas ostensibly represents has become quite a normalized interpretation of how to think about October 7 and the past two decades in Gaza, while erasing Palestinian agency, responsibility, and accountability. The inability to truly understand the complexities and actual details of the Israel and Palestine conflict is why so many support Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and the Iranian regime, all of whom are somehow seen as correcting or challenging white-centric dominance and colonialism. The third anniversary of October 7 exposed the scale of this shift. Large crowds in American and European cities used the worst day for Jews since the Holocaust and the most disastrous day in Palestinian history to flaunt their support for violent Islamist extremism. To understand the extent to which the “pro-Palestine” industrial complex has mutated and created out-of-control monsters, consider how incredibly damaging and self-sabotaging the pro-Hamas rallies and actions were. They deliberately chose to brand the Palestinian cause as inseparable from the bloodshed, hostage‑taking, and fascistic jihad of 10/7. These Western pro‑Hamas demonstrators are erasing any distinction between Palestinians and a terror organization that has devastated Palestinian society far more than it ever harmed Israelis. Their behavior naturally triggers an instinctive backlash: a hardening of attitudes, a dismissal of Palestinian suffering, and a collapse of sympathy for legitimate Palestinian grievances. Compounding the problem is the statistically confirmed fact that large segments of the Arab, Muslim, and Palestinian diaspora communities have been unable or unwilling to counter this trend. Some have joined it outright, embracing the “resistance” narrative or hiding behind slogans like “this didn’t begin on October 7” to avoid confrontation with the anti‑Zionist machinery that dominates the “pro‑Palestine” space and to not be called “Zionists” or “traitors” by other members of the community. With diaspora communities paralyzed, universities compromised, and basic civic norms eroded, national‑level responses are now essential. Support for Hamas remains strong three years after October 7 and is growing more entrenched. Think ahead five or ten years: persistent economic strain, deeper ideological radicalization, and expanding networks of Islamist and far‑left extremism. What happens when those marching for Hamas begin entering governments, militaries, financial institutions, and other levers of power? What happens when already‑radicalized youth, with no off‑ramps, continue believing the West, Jews, and Zionists are their mortal enemies? Even if a tiny fraction – less than one‑tenth of one percent – turn to violence, the resulting instability could eclipse that of ISIS and al-Qaeda combined. A coordinated national strategy is overdue – not to suppress legitimate debate on Israel and Palestine, but to draw firm boundaries and stop tolerating the intolerable. This video shows just a small sample of pro-Hamas rallies in major US and European cities two days ago, on October 7.
168
829
114
2,490
268,108