Earwig retweeted
Sevgili erkekler.. umarım kızınız ileride sizin gibi biriyle karşılaşır. Bunu dua ya da beddua olarak algılamanız sizin nasıl biri olduğunuzu gösterir..
Earwig retweeted
🚨🇬🇧 Russell Brand r*ped one woman and s*xually assaulted three others. A jury convicted him. A judge sentenced him to 10.5 years. He denied all the charges and told police the encounters were consensual.
His defenders have settled on six lines. Hearsay. No DNA. He said, she said. No CCTV. No witnesses. No evidence. These posts are all over Twitter.
Put together, they set one standard: unless a r*pe is filmed, it didn’t happen.
Almost no r*pe meets that standard. Most happen in private, by a man the woman knows. There’s no camera and no one else in the room. English law stopped requiring corroboration in sexual offence cases in 1994.
Her testimony is evidence. It was tested under cross-examination. The jury weighed each count separately and acquitted him on three. A stitch-up doesn’t end in three acquittals.
UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham says victims need the confidence to come forward. Fewer than one in six women who are r*ped report it to police. Among victims who told someone but not the police, a quarter said they didn’t expect to be believed.
These ghoulish posts reinforcing r*pe myths, mainly from far-right accounts, tell them they were right.
Earwig retweeted
This whole manosphere bullshit has created a dangerous situation for women. They think if they have vaginal sex every hole is a goal and no need to get consent. I'm ashamed of my gender
Earwig retweeted
I've had a massive change of perspective over the past year or so. I used to labour under the delusion that the best way to establish someone's guilt for a serious crime was to conduct an investigation, examine the evidence in a court of law and allow a jury to reach an informed verdict.
Turns out, that's hopelessly outdated. The entire system should be scrapped in favour of this far more sophisticated and vastly more efficient single-question test:
Does the accused parrot my political beliefs?
If yes: They're obviously being persecuted by the deep state because they're such an existential threat to the establishment.
If no: They're clearly a filthy nonce who should be shot.
Who knew the pursuit of justice could be so wonderfully straightforward? All those years of legal training, evidence gathering and jury deliberation. What an appalling waste of everyone's time.
Earwig retweeted
People may not like what I am about to post on this but it is the FACTS!
If you are making excuses for old "Rusty Rockets", aka, Russell Brand, then you may as well be making them for Jimmy Savile, Gary Glitter, Rolf Harris, and Harvey Weinstein also.
Many of those were convicted or in the case of Savile, a prolific sexual abuser whose extensive offending was documented by posthumous investigations where no DNA was used and required historical victims.
I think you'd agree with me that if you were making excuses for these men you would be considered a r*pist and pa*dophile apologist, so why do it for Brand?
1) People say there was no DNA, well the same goes for the aforementioned, almost all of their convictions relied upon historical victims or in Savile's case, posthumous investigations.
2) People say there it is just "her story", which is incredibly manipulative language used to undermine her credibility, and support Brand.
It was not "just her story" when she took the stand, it is sworn testimony, aka, evidence.
3) Evidence that the jury of 12 believed in. Not a judge, a jury!
4) This victim has 24 supporting witnesses to just her evidence alone and that isn't counting the other 3 charges he was convicted of also.
5) One of the 24 witnesses was the sexual health / trauma nurse that done the HIV / AIDS / STI test and supported her evidence and that test too was entered into evidence.
6) There are text messages also supporting that anal sex against her will took place including: “Because you are dirty and I want to push you even further.” She replied that he had treated her “like an animal”; he said “I’m sorry.” She described feeling “completely degraded” and “like a piece of meat.”
7) Brand's own Barrister, Ian Winter KC, said in mitigation to the judge that they accept the guilty verdict and in sentencing told the court the rape (the 2009 anal rape of the then-21-year-old complainant after consensual vaginal sex) “should be regarded as a man who went too far and overrode consent that had been given.”
He characterised it as “really quite a short, momentary total failure to respect her consent in two areas” (consent limited to vaginal sex, and the condom remaining on), with “no planning” and “no premeditation.”
8 ) Baring all of that in mind we also have Russell Brand admitting to @megynkelly he had sex with a 16 year old as an adult man.
9) Brand also went on national TV to ask Vanessa Feltz if he could have sex with her 15 year-old daughter.
10) Is on a video talking about an incestuous orgy he had with his dad and a group of Chinese prostitutes.
THE ONLY thing I will cede on is the fact that illegal migrants and those in "high-society" are not treated in the same manner like Prince Andrew et al.
Outside of that, please, for the love of god, stop creating conspiratorial bollicks to defend this fuckin monster!
You can't seriously be out here crying about safe-guarding for girls for a guy with that kind of record and that evidence at a trial and ignore the historical examples of Savile, Harris, Cosby, Weinstein, and Glitter!!
The double standards and fuckin hypocrisy!!
Anyway, here's a PREVIEW of my Latest episode of Loco Thoughts on Youtube!
I'm out 🫳🎤
youtu.be/kCgqH9fVKsk?is=0q-2…
Earwig retweeted
The Judge's sentencing remarks are always the only way to get the facts.
Trigger warning, these are very hard to read, but if you're going to publicly support Russell Brand you really shouldn't rely on social media commentary.
They're here👇
judiciary.uk/wp-content/uplo…
Earwig retweeted
Keep talking because the texts are out there. Andrew and Tristan sexually assaulted, coerced and traumatized minors into sleeping with them. Tristan Tate coerced a vulnerable teenager to have anal sex with him. Your clients are next!
Earwig retweeted
🚨🇬🇧 Russell Brand was jailed yesterday for 10 years and 6 months. One r*pe, three s*xual assaults, four women.
Tate fans should pay attention. Brand ran the same playbook. He moved to Florida, built an audience on conspiracy content, and called the allegations a Matrix hit job. A UK jury convicted him anyway. The same jury acquitted him on three other counts. A rigged system doesn’t do that.
The Matrix theory can’t lose. When someone is convicted, it’s persecution. When someone isn’t charged, it’s a cover-up. Every outcome confirms it.
That’s how the grooming gang scandal gets used. The failures were real. Police and councils failed those girls for years, and some officials held back for fear of being called racist. The Jay report and the Casey audit documented it. That was cowardice and incompetence. No evidence shows a coordinated plot. The same system exposed the failures and prosecuted the offenders. Last year, seven Rochdale men got between 12 and 35 years.
Nor do Pakistani or Muslim men get lighter sentences. Judges in England and Wales must follow Sentencing Council guidelines unless that would be contrary to the interests of justice. The guidelines set ranges by harm and culpability. They don’t include religion or ethnicity.
The UK ranks 18th of 143 on the World Justice Project’s 2026 Rule of Law Index. On the measures the Matrix theory says are missing, it ranks higher: 12th for constraints on government powers, 13th for absence of corruption, 12th for open government.
Romania ranks 45th. Andrew Tate once said a big part of why he moved there was that “in Eastern Europe, none of this garbage flies.” He meant MeToo-era s*xual assault allegations.
In the UK, the CPS has authorised 59 charges against the brothers, including r*pe and trafficking for s*xual exploitation. Andrew also faces counts relating to indecent images of a child. Court filings say the girl was 17. Both deny all charges.
The same accounts calling grooming gangs the worst crime in modern Britain are defending men charged with trafficking for s*xual exploitation and child image offences.
The Tates have said for years there are no victims. They could consent to extradition and take that case to a UK jury. They’ve chosen to fight it from a federal detention cell.
Brand came back from Florida and faced a jury. The Tates are contesting every step that would put them in front of one. You do the maths.
Earwig retweeted
I am not sure why so many men seem concerned for their safety after the Brand verdict and sentence. I have been sexually active since my teens and I have zero worry that the police will come knocking on my door for a historic rape or sexual assault case.
My past, like many others, is chequered but there is not one thing I have done that makes me fear that is even the remotest of possibilities.
Earwig retweeted
So I listened to the sentencing by the judge in the Russell Brand trial. 10 years and 6 months altogether and he is expected to serve two thirds of that.
A substantial sentence was expected and the judge has carefully considered everything and explained how sentencing guidelines interacted with all the necessary information and frankly I believe it is fair in the circumstances.
Prison will be horrible for him and I do actually feel a bit sorry for him - how low he has fallen from how feted he was in the past - but especially of course I truly feel bad for his wife and children. But being a sexual predator and enjoying the thrill of power and humiliation which appears to have been the case in the one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault he was found guilty of, are a very long way away from a consenting mutual act of sex or touching. For any man confusing the two, get educated. Fast.
The women who came forward have frankly been very brave. Hoping this verdict and sentence will give them the confidence to reclaim any part of their lives still missing after the damage done to them by this man years ago.
Earwig retweeted
The Judge in the Russell Brand trial is summing up, this is what he had to say about the victim in count 6.
It is not easy to listen to, as what Brand did is utterly disgusting so *Viewer Discretion Advised**
Earwig retweeted
The idea that Russell Brand of all people is such a dangerous truth teller that the ~establishment~had to take him down is honestly so fucking depressing like really, this is one of humanity's best? God help us.
Earwig retweeted
1. He’s a father. He’s also a rapist.
2. He’s a husband. He’s also a rapist.
3. Witness testimony is evidence.
4. Grooming gangs have been convicted and sentenced.
Earwig retweeted
Well ladies let us all raise a glass today to Judge Bennathan in the Russell Brand case, and to those brave women that were able to speak up. How many more have suffered in silence is unthinkable.
Earwig retweeted
Russell Brand tried to get his rape trial thrown out by accusing the journalists who exposed him of committing crimes. His lawyer even questioned whether the women in the documentary existed.
The judge rejected the argument.
Nice try!
