On most launchpads, a large part of the trading fee goes to the creator. @RebateLaunch takes a different approach. Platform fees from launches are routed toward $REBATE buybacks and burns instead of mostly going to the team or the launcher. This creates a clear trade-off for creators. They give up a bigger share of the fee compared to some other pads. In return, the model is designed to attract buyers with bonus tokens and give holders ongoing payouts without staking. A few reasons a creator might still choose it: → Buyers start with a better entry, which can help early volume → Fixed rules reduce the usual “will the team change things later” concern → The buyback and burn mechanism can support the broader ecosystem if activity grows The downside is straightforward. If volume doesn’t stay healthy, the creator earns less than they would on a pad that gives them a higher cut. It’s a bet that better incentives for buyers and holders will lead to more sustained activity than a higher immediate fee share. Whether that bet pays off depends on how many quality launches actually happen and how long people stay. @starlisting