Elan Carr (@ElanSCarr) header
Elan Carr (@ElanSCarr) profile picture

Former U.S. Special Envoy @StateDept and Former Criminal Prosecutor; Military Officer; Iraq War Veteran; Proud Husband and Father. RT/Follow ≠ Endorsement.

Joined February 2014
Photo by Elan Carr (@ElanSCarr)Photo by Elan Carr (@ElanSCarr)Photo by Elan Carr (@ElanSCarr)Photo by Elan Carr (@ElanSCarr)Photo by Elan Carr (@ElanSCarr)Photo by Elan Carr (@ElanSCarr)Photo by Elan Carr (@ElanSCarr)Photo by Elan Carr (@ElanSCarr)Photo by Elan Carr (@ElanSCarr)Photo by Elan Carr (@ElanSCarr)
This is a total hoot. About the only thing it gets correct is that 2024 Trump voters were "pissed." As the polls spell out, very clearly, they were angry about tariffs--a word weirdly not found in this post, but which exit polls showed 65% of voters dislike. There's a straight line between those punishing costs and Senate losses in Kansas, Iowa, Ohio (farm areas) and beyond. Angry the WH instead spent this past year talking about ballrooms and the Kennedy center. Frustrated by the complete absence of a next-two-year agenda (85% are concerned by healthcare costs. Where is the GOP plan?) They are also unhappy about the war, though the numbers might be different if the president been clear about an exit strategy. And not sure where the "smartest" (and most anonymous) pollster in the world got the Israel argument. Exit polls show that of the 51% of voters who said our support for Israel was "too strong," only 19% of even that subset of respondents were Republican. The vast majority of GOP voters said our support for Israel was "just right" or "not strong enough." Amusing to claim the problem here was traditional conservatives, as they were sidelined. Tillis was run out of the party, dooming NC. As was Cornyn. The WH had a pure expression of its second-term Trump/Vance agenda and loyalty in its chosen candidate of Ken Paxton. That would be the smoking carcass sitting on a 12-point loss in. . . Texas of all places. Meanwhile, who exactly is even talking about "asylum"? That's just a smear-y effort to preemptively shut down valid criticism. The GOP strength has always been in its coalition--free-marketers, defense hawks, cultural conservatives. Trump's first-term success came from largely following that Reagan playbook. The second-term leaned into me-too progressive populism--at the veep's urging--and it ain't working. The weird thing is that the veep remains more obsessed with remaking the party than with winning. Winning will require a lot better understanding of what happened yesterday than what is on offer in this alternate-universe view.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
749
956
147
5,746
763,522
Mr. Vice-President, Please allow me to present a different perspective. The problem was not the Iran War. It was the cease fire. If you start a war, you need to win it and finish it – otherwise don’t start it. This war should have been over six months ago, with the Strait of Hormuz wide open and oil flowing. The second and third tiers of Iranian leadership should have been destroyed, and we should have supported the pro-western forces who could have taken leadership. We stood on the brink of a new, more peaceful Middle East - and then we blinked. We had a chance not only to deny Iran nuclear weapons, but to get rid of the world’s biggest supporter of terrorism. Instead, we had a cease fire, which was followed by months of will we or won’t we finish the job. Every day was a different message. There still is. Is the war over? Is it about to begin? No one knows. There is confusion and inconsistency. In June 2025, America was not involved. This was an Israel vs Iran issue. No one forced the United States to attack Iran then, or in February of 2026. It was a decision made by President Trump. In my opinion, it was the right decision. Once the decision was made, we should not have stopped until the regime fell. But instead, you negotiated a cease fire that didn’t last, didn’t work and left us in no man’s land, with higher prices and our troops still deployed. Our troops could have been home, the Navy returned to its bases, a peaceful regime in place , new alliances forged, and gas prices below $3.00 a gallon. No, Mr. Vice President. It’s not the war. It’s the so-called cease fire.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
8,973
14,545
2,234
67,078
6,226,285
Elan Carr retweeted
Abdul El-Sayed deleted this post. It would be a shame if it went viral before voting starts.
272
3,231
86
9,865
232,591
Would be easy to say NY Mayor is just an ignorant bigot, but he is not dumb. He's an evil anti-Semite who deliberately lies about serious things like "genocide" to stoke Jew hate. If anyone should be arrested, it's the Mayor of NY for incitement. NYC should be ashamed.
Benjamin Netanyahu is a war criminal.
5,026
5,784
479
29,682
1,508,087
Elan Carr retweeted
💪
The world's two greatest Air Forces (🇺🇸 + 🇮🇱) continue to dominate the skies over Iran.
214
645
10
6,154
186,182
The world's two greatest Air Forces (🇺🇸 + 🇮🇱) continue to dominate the skies over Iran.
1,765
2,873
245
23,289
1,680,253
In Iran right now: • No internet • No phone calls • No communication with the outside world Yet the Islamic regime’s main state broadcaster is airing and promoting Tucker Carlson. This was way too much for my brain to handle.
847
4,200
614
21,964
2,198,714
Today, I designated the Muslim Brotherhood and Council on American-Islamic Relations as foreign terrorist and transnational criminal organizations. This bans them from buying or acquiring land in Texas and authorizes the Attorney General to sue to shut them down.
9,095
23,660
3,346
118,178
9,547,628
Elan Carr retweeted
We're incredibly grateful to the Alevy family and all of the amazing work they've done to support the Jewish community–and our young people in particular. Nobody deserves the 'Charlie Kirk Freedom Award' more than this inspiring family. Thank you for everything you do, and continue to do! #RJCSummit
13
9
78
4,571
A mere 17 days after the Oct 7 Massacre, while Israel was still sifting through literal ashes to identify the 1400+ Jews who were brutally raped, kidnapped and slaughtered, Zohran Mamdani led a pro-Hamas rally calling for the destruction of Israel.
1,001
6,834
431
12,433
312,954
Disgusted by the vandalism at the @israeliamerican HQ in LA. This is where we are: a Jewish nonprofit is defaced with slogans such as "F**k Jews" and the letters SS - a reference to the Nazis who perpetrated the Holocaust. Moreover, as of this writing, city, state and national leaders have said literally nothing. It's cowardly and shameful. Standing in solidarity with everyone at IAC.
The national headquarters of the Israeli-American Council (IAC) in Woodland Hills was targeted in an antisemitic vandalism incident over the weekend. ADL Los Angeles comments on this hateful act. ktla.com/news/local-news/isr…
6
1
32
6,451
Mahmoud Khalil refuses to condemn Hamas because he IS a terrorist sympathizer not because DHS ‘painted’ him as one. He ‘branded’ himself as antisemite through his own hateful behavior and rhetoric. It is a privilege to be granted a visa or green card to live and study in the United States of America. The Trump Administration acted well within its statutory and constitutional authority to detain Khalil, as it does with any alien who advocates for violence, glorifies and supports terrorists, harasses Jews, and damages property.
2,382
3,624
537
17,044
1,723,657
United is willing to fly through Israel but not fly to Israel? Why is it safe to do the former but too dangerous to do the latter? Could it be that United’s selective security concerns are little more than a pretext for a thinly veiled boycott?
491
709
76
3,955
439,468
If I had a staffer who publicly challenged my position on an issue like Israel, that staffer would be fired in a heartbeat. In every Congressional office, there is only one name on the door—only one principal voted into office by the people. If you cannot get with program, then you should no longer be part of the program.
535
691
99
5,972
356,283
The Iranians are spreading a story about how the US has given up names of Mossad agents inside Iran to curry favor with the mullahs. Everyone who is amplifying this story is helping Iran's propagandistic aims here and should stop immediately.
90
160
36
862
96,097
In this week’s episode of TALX with @traiman, the indomitable @ElanSCarr discusses the unique approach of the @IsraeliAmerican Council to combat antisemitism. youtube.com/watch?v=YdceSFm6…
6
8
1,028
Five years ago today, JNS.org leaked the story that I had been tapped to be the CEO of Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations! Thank you to everyone who was instrumental in getting me there - and to all who I've worked with over these last five years. Particular thanks and appreciation to my family for your strength and patience... #AmYisraelChai jns.org/conference-of-presid…
12
3
4
71
15,030
This didn’t age well. As close to 100% wrong as you can get. Even the spelling is wrong!
“There is no scenario where sanctions relief turns Iran into the region's dominate power.” —President Obama #IranDeal
40
320
8
1,349
34,664