⚒️ 🎗️ Scream so that a hundred years from now, a sister won’t have to dry her tears and wonder where in history she lost her voice
Upton Park
Joined June 2012
- Tweets15.8K
- Following213
- Followers2.3K
- Likes66.3K
M retweeted
Imagine being THIS stupid. Federal agents are trying to apprehend a pedophile, and this clown thinks his job is to physically block them. Congratulations, genius. You’re not a hero, you’re an obstacle to law enforcement. 🤡
M retweeted
It’s nice to know that no matter which side of the political spectrum you’re on, we’ve all managed to come together in our shared hatred for Alastair Campbell.
Perhaps it could be a new British value?
M retweeted
Why Alastair Campbell has any sort of platform in this country after Iraq is a damning indictment on us as a nation.
British troops dead. Hundreds of thousands killed. And yet some people still want to listen to him.
Campbell and Blair were the worst thing to happen to Britain in half a century.
M retweeted
After the deadly train crash in Spain, people of all ages and sizes rushed to hospitals to donate blood. But Spaniards have noticed one group is missing.
Migrants make up 20% of the population, yet they’re nowhere to be seen.
So much for solidarity.
M retweeted
We had a black President for 8 years and not a single redneck, Republican or white supremacist took a shot at him.
The Left has a very different view of what the word tolerance means.
M retweeted
This apology from disability charity Scope, for cancelling my choir’s London Marathon performance because of my gender-critical views, is required to stay on its website for seven days.
Today is Day 6.
Women don’t always get the apologies they deserve. So I’d be grateful if you could help make sure this one is seen by sharing it over the next 24 hours (link below). 🙏
Thanks again to @SpeechUnion for supporting my legal case and helping secure this apology.
M retweeted
🚨London 2026. Full burqa driving the 88 bus to Parliament Hill Fields.
She can barely see the road.
She can barely be identified in an emergency. And she has a double-decker full of strangers whose lives depend on her reaction time.
Passengers don’t get a vote on whether they want a faceless driver. They just have to hope nothing goes wrong.
If your religious practice requires completely covering your face and restricting your vision, you are free to do that in your private life.
You are not free to do it while operating a public vehicle that weighs several tons and carries dozens of people.
This is not “diversity.” This is a safety failure dressed up as tolerance.
And everyone on that bus is paying for it.
M retweeted
I’ve had some criticism for publishing this man’s picture. As I’ve had with similar stories.
Apparently, reporting on someone’s publicly stated views and activities is now considered ‘outing’ them.
But these men have already ‘outed’ themselves.
They’ve published their own names, photographs and details of their activities online. For anyone to see.
And when information about their profession or place of work is also publicly available, it hardly takes a detective to join the dots.
I haven’t gone digging into their private lives or uncovered some great secret. I’ve reported information they’ve chosen to make public.
But here’s the more important point. These are stories of legitimate public interest.
In this case, a man publicly announced plans to organise a group to turn up at a parkrun event to give people he calls ‘transphobes’ a fright.
In other words, to give women campaigning for fairness in female sport a fright.
I recognise he may not be aware that many of these women have already experienced abuse, threats and intimidation. But that doesn’t make his plans any less newsworthy.
I also understand this man is employed as a science teacher. Which, if correct, raises further questions about his judgement.
As a journalist, my job is to report the facts accurately and give people the opportunity to respond. He was offered the chance to comment. He didn’t take it.
Suggesting that legitimate public-interest reporting is somehow unethical is just another way of trying to silence journalists.
Are we supposed to anonymise people who have already publicly identified themselves to protect their ‘feelings’? Or simply not report the story?
This is how you create a chilling effect on journalism.
And that should concern anyone who believes in a free press.
The purpose of journalism isn’t to protect people from scrutiny. It’s to report matters of public interest - even when the people involved would rather we didn’t.
That’s how a free press works.
Read story below 👇
M retweeted
Mohmed Abdulkarim and Nouman Essghir have both been charged under National Security Act after RAF Fairford incident.
The most insufferable person you can think of told you they were just stealing fuel.
M retweeted
High Wycombe’s mayor, Imran Hussain, has accused me of being 'irresponsible and wrong' for highlighting the changing demographics of a Wycombe school.
Wycombe High School has gone from 60% White British in 2016 to just 30% now. Ten years.
I asked if we were able to have a mature debate about how immigration has already entirely demographically transformed our country.
Clearly, the answer is no.
I'm told the town 'stronger because of its diversity, not in spite of it'.
Right. Okay.
I disagree.
Mass immigration has made our towns more dangerous, more divided, more deprived.
For decades, politicians like Hussain have been able to shut down the debate with these bullshit diversity buzzwords - accusing anyone with legitimate concerns of racism or bigotry.
It will not work anymore.
