We filed our response brief in this case yesterday. You can read it here: firearmspolicy.org/campos

Howell Township filed its response brief today. You can read it here: assets.nationbuilder.com/fir…

A reply in support of the motion was filed today. You can read it here: firearmspolicy.org/hartford

"For nearly three decades, Mr. Range has been unjustly denied his Second Amendment rights," said Greenlee. "We're thrilled that Mr. Range's rights have been restored, and about the decision’s potential implications for countless others who have been wrongfully disarmed."

Greenlee's authoritative scholarship on the issue, an article published by the Wyoming Law Review in 2020, was cited in both a concurring and dissenting opinion, as it had been by the 3-judge panel opinion.

FPC and FPCAF filed amicus briefs in this case at both the 3-judge and en banc panel stages, and FPCAF's Director of Constitutional Studies, Joseph Greenlee, argued the case as an amicus curiae before the 3-judge panel.

Range v. Garland is the first post-Bruen en banc victory, and on an issue FPC and FPCAF have been actively engaged on. FPC and FPCAF will continue to seek the restoration of natural, fundamental, and enumerated rights for all of the People. firearmspolicy.org/fpc-and-f…

LEGAL ALERT: A judge has denied the motion for preliminary injunction in our lawsuit challenging Washington's "assault weapon ban," saying that the banned firearms "allow a shooter to fire as fast as they can pull the trigger, unlike previous guns." firearmspolicy.org/hartford

FPC announced today that a judge has approved a $556,957.66 stipulation for attorneys' fees stemming from its lawsuit that successfully challenged the fee-shifting provision in CA SB 1327, which was enacted as retribution for Texas's SB 8 abortion law. firearmspolicy.org/californi…

Opening briefs were filed with the Seventh Circuit yesterday by Chicago, Cook County, and Illinois in our lawsuit challenging the state's "assault weapon" and magazine bans. You can read them here: firearmspolicy.org/harrel

The plaintiffs filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss last night. You can read it here: firearmspolicy.org/lane

We filed a response today. You can read it here: firearmspolicy.org/hartford

New Jersey filed a reply in support of its motion to stay today. You can read it here: firearmspolicy.org/koons

Today in our lawsuit that successfully challenged California's firearm lawsuit fee-shifting law, the defendants agreed to pay the plaintiffs $556,957.66 for their attorney's fees: firearmspolicy.org/miller2