Fluff 🔞 retweeted
RECADO IMPORTANTE
Por mais ruins que estejam as coisas, não cogitem tirar suas vidas.
Homens jovens são o índice demográfico com a maior taxa de suicídios.
Façamos dessa postagem um mural de mensagens positivas.
Se você é de direita ou oposição, que seja, você é bem-vindo.
Fluff 🔞 retweeted
GANHAMOS, PORRA.
COM MUITO ESFORÇO, O FUTURO DO PAÍS FOI PROTEGIDO MAIS UMA VEZ DESSES FASCISTAS, TRAIDORES DA PÁTRIA E ENTREGUISTAS.
MAIS UMA VEZ AQUELA CORJA TENTOU DAR UM GOLPE, E NOVAMENTE FALHOU EM ROUBAR NOSSO FUTURO, ESSES RATOS FALHARAM EM DESTRUIR NOSSA DEMOCRACIA!
Fluff 🔞 retweeted
Learning muv luv tactics is using generative AI is like discovering the high school teacher everyone used to fuck with 10 years ago doing a fent lean on the corner of the street right now
Fluff 🔞 retweeted
I’ll never forget the time an interviewer asked Johnny Knoxville about the homoerotic subtext in Jackass and he got mad at them for calling it subtext.
Fluff 🔞 retweeted
Engraçado ver a "Tudo Celular" dizer que o GrapheneOS "coleciona polêmicas" por ir contra a "Lei Felca" e decisões corporativistas...
NÃO SE SEGUE LEIS RUINS!
Se a lei usa uma preocupação legitima para espalhar mais controle e silenciamento, ainda menos!
Replying to @Ced_haurus @getyoti
> Why? GrapheneOS restricts camera and biometric APIs. A scan that works on stock Android can fail in a loop on GrapheneOS. The repeated failure isn't fraud. It's a technical incompatibility.
GrapheneOS is fully compatible with Android apps using the standard APIs. Apps with memory corruption bugs happening in regular use are usually incompatible with it when the full exploit protections are enabled for user installed apps. However, it can be worked around with the per-app compatibility toggles.
The reason apps like this are sometimes incompatible is because they use the Play Integrity API to ban using an OS / device not certified by Google. Some use similar mechanisms to detect users not using a Google Mobile Services OS. Other than that, all apps are compatible with GrapheneOS in practice.
When apps aren't compatible even with the per-app compatibility mode toggle, it's usually deliberate. We're gradually working around these deliberate incompatibilities from apps trying to detect a non-stock OS. It's getting better but it takes time. We don't have a non-regulatory solution to long term compatibility with services enforcing the Play Integrity API but we can work around what apps do themselves to ban alternatives and are making quick progress.
Fluff 🔞 retweeted
Todo México y el mundo celebra que de ahora en adelante tenemos solamente un Grande Americano 👏🥹🌹 #AAANocheDeLosGrandes
Fluff 🔞 retweeted
🍒Escreve-escreve✍️
Demorou, mas chegou. Fazia muito tempo que eu não postava nada, ainda mais dessa história. Fico feliz em ter terminado e espero que vocês gostem! Sintam-se livres para dizer o que acharam. DM aberta.
Rt+❤️ são apreciados✨
Tw⚠️: Suic***, depressão e sangue.
frutacitrica12.blogspot.com/…
#literatura #escrita #vampiro
Fluff 🔞 retweeted
Nope. Goose's apathy is 1000% justified. They did everything they could to prevent this, got harassed non stop, and it happened anyway.
This fandom genuinely deserves nothing.
Fluff 🔞 retweeted
To my friends overseas: A problem is occurring that will have a significant impact on Japanese content creators. The issue of censoring sexual content and the problem of Article 175 of the Penal Code are unique to Japan, but I would appreciate it if you could share this issue widely.
昨夜、Fantiaから「修正・モザイク基準に関するガイドライン改定」が示され、日本のクリエイターの間で大きな波紋が広がっています。関係諸機関より「一部のコンテンツにおける修正・モザイクの基準」について、法的な観点から極めて厳格な指導・指摘を受けている状況を鑑み、基準を厳格化をする。また、新基準は5月25日から、過去の投稿作品も含め適用され、基準を満たさない場合、
・該当コンテンツの修正依頼・即時非公開 または 削除対応
・改善が見られない場合のファンクラブ凍結 または 閉鎖処理
・悪質な法令違反が疑われる場合、警察等の関係機関へのログ情報の開示・通報
など、極めて緊急的で、厳しい内容です。
実は、Fantiaからは5月15日にも、「【重要】修正・モザイク基準の再確認と遵守のお願い」の知らせが出され、その中では、「万が一、刑法第175条(わいせつ物頒布罪、わいせつ物陳列罪)等に抵触すると判断された場合、警察による捜査対象となり、逮捕・処罰に至る深刻な法的リスクを伴います。」など言及しており、ここ数日間で「遵守のお願い」が「ガイドライン変更」に至ったことからも、緊急で重大な何かが起こっていることを伺わせます。
Fantiaを利用しているクリエイターは非常に多く過去作も膨大、影響も甚大であり、期限の短さ、措置の厳しさからも今後について多くの不安を呼んでいますが、仮に刑法175条に基づいた規制・検閲を当局が強硬に働きかけているとしたら、一体どのような社会的利益があるというのでしょうか。
文言詳細についてはぜひ公式の発表もご確認ください。
spotlight.fantia.jp/news/260…
































