FRACAS (@FracasWeb3) header
FRACAS (@FracasWeb3) profile picture

Web3 Marketing | $50M+ raised via KOLs, GTM & token launches

Click here →
Joined October 2020
Bots don’t move markets. People do. Here’s how we helped out clients raise $50M+ via KOL campaigns👇
28
12
1
86
195,384
Happy to announce our new partnership @FracasWeb3 x @kick we're building a roster of crypto streamers on KICK: - creator program access - setup handled - taking on more creators right now if you stream anything crypto or want to start, my dm's are open
12
2
29
890
I don't think most projects fail at content because their marketing team doesn't know what they're doing They fail because too many people do The founder wants it more professional The dev wants the technical accuracy checked The CMO wants the brand voice reviewed By the time it posts, every edge has been sanded off Then they wonder why nobody engages The fastest way to kill a post is to over engineer it How many approvals does a post need at your company?
2
1
6
151
3 million+ views across World Cup watchalong streams And we still have matches left This is what bespoke KOL campaigns look like in practice A creator watching the same match as their community, with your product naturally in the moment We've been running these across English and Spanish speaking audiences throughout the tournament Different creators, different markets, same principle find the right person, find the right moment, make it natural The World Cup has been the biggest event we've activated around this year But it's one of many Wimbledon. LoL Worlds. The next final. Every event is an opportunity to be in the room when an engaged audience is at peak attention If this is something you want to build into your marketing strategy, my DMs are open
4
1
2
215
The Brain: Why Your AI Tools Are Useless Without One (And How To Build It) You gave Claude your brand guidelines last Tuesday. By Thursday it had forgotten them. You explained your tone of voice to ChatGPT in January. Last week it wrote you something that sounded like a LinkedIn robot. Every company using AI right now is running into the same wall. The models are smart. Ridiculously, absurdly smart. But they wake up with amnesia every single session. @hooeem published a breakdown recently on LLM knowledge bases, building on something Andrej Karpathy shared about using AI to maintain personal research wikis. Solid piece. Go read it. But while that thread focused on individuals building personal knowledge systems, we kept thinking about something slightly different. What does this look like when an entire company needs one? Not a personal wiki. Not a research hobby project. A living, structured system that means any AI model you plug into it immediately understands your business, your clients, your tone, your processes, your history. Everything. We started calling it The Brain. What The Brain Actually Is Forget apps. Forget software. The Brain is a folder. Seriously. A directory of plain text files, organised in a specific way, that gives any AI model the context it needs to work like a senior employee on day one. Not day 90. Day one. Think about what a new hire needs before they're useful. They need to know how the company talks. What projects are active. Who the clients are. What's been tried before. Where the credentials live. What the brand sounds like. What mistakes to avoid. Most companies store that across Notion, Google Drive, Slack threads, someone's head, and a PDF from 2023 that nobody can find. The Brain puts all of it in one place, structured so AI agents can read it, act on it, and stay consistent across every session. The models are the consciousness. Claude, GPT, Gemini, whatever comes next. They do the thinking. But thinking without memory is just improvisation. The Brain is the memory. Why This Matters More Than You Think Right now, most businesses using AI are stuck in a loop. Every new chat starts cold. You paste in context. You re-explain your brand voice. You correct the output. You do this forty times a week and call it "using AI." That's not a workflow. That's babysitting. With The Brain, the conversation starts warm. The model reads your project files, your protocols, your client history. It already knows that your company spells "colour" with a u, that your CEO hates exclamation marks, that client X prefers formal comms and client Y wants everything casual. One of the best parts is that it's model-agnostic. The Brain is just files. Markdown, mostly. You can plug it into Claude today, move to GPT next month, switch to whatever open-source model drops in Q3. The intelligence layer changes. The Brain stays. And it compounds. Every project you document, every protocol you refine, every client preference you record makes every future session better. Six months in, your AI assistant knows more about your business operations than most of your actual team. The Architecture (Steal This) We've been building and refining these structures for a while now. Not just for our own projects, but increasingly for clients too. The pattern that works looks something like this: The Root File. Call it whatever you want. We use CLAUDE.md because that's what Claude reads automatically, but it's just a text file. This is the master instruction set. It tells any AI model: here's how this company is structured, here's where to find things, here's what to read before doing anything. Think of it as the job description for your AI. Project Folders. One per active project. Each gets its own context file explaining the tech stack, the current status, known issues, who's involved, what's been tried. An AI agent reading this folder should be able to pick up where the last session left off without a single question. Protocols. These are your "how we do things" documents. Writing style. Outreach process. Content standards. Reporting format. Anything that should stay consistent across every piece of work gets its own protocol file. Write it once. Every AI session follows it automatically. Credentials and Integrations. A single inventory of what connects where. API keys, service accounts, access tokens, database connections. Centralised. Documented. No more hunting through email threads. Data Sources. Where does your information come from? What APIs do you use? What's the refresh schedule? If your AI is supposed to pull data, it needs to know where to look and what to trust. The whole structure might be 15-20 files for a small company. Could be 50-60 for a larger operation with multiple products and clients. Every single one is plain text. No proprietary format. No vendor lock-in. Works on every operating system, backs up to any cloud, version controls with Git. How To Build Your Own (The Free Version) You can start this afternoon. Properly. Two hours and a cup of tea. Step one. Create a folder. Name it something sensible. "Company Brain" works. Inside it, create three subfolders: Projects, Protocols, Credentials. Step two. Write your root file. Open a text editor. Start with: "This folder is the single source of truth for [your company name]." Then list what's in each subfolder and what rules the AI should follow. Keep it under 80 lines. You're writing instructions for a very capable assistant, not a novel. Step three. Document your first project. Pick your most active one. Write down: what it is, what tech it uses, who's involved, what the current status is, what's gone wrong before. Be specific. "The API sometimes times out after 30 seconds" is useful. "There are occasionally some performance considerations" is not. Step four. Write one protocol. Start with how your company writes. Tone of voice, words you never use, formatting preferences, spelling conventions. This single document will save you more correction time than anything else in The Brain. Step five. Connect it. If you're using Claude, drop the folder into a Project. If you're using Claude Code, just open the folder and start a session, it reads the root file automatically. ChatGPT users can paste the root file into Custom Instructions and upload project files as needed. That's a working Brain. Basic, but functional. And already better than what 95% of companies are doing with AI right now. Where Most People Get It Wrong Three mistakes we see constantly. The first is trying to build the whole thing in a weekend. Don't. Start with one project folder and one protocol. Add more as you go. The Brain should grow with your business, not arrive fully formed like some kind of corporate encyclopedia nobody maintains. The second is making the files too long. AI models have context limits. A 200-line project file gets read and used. A 2,000-line knowledge dump gets skimmed and half-forgotten, same as it would by a human. Be specific. Be brief. Link between files instead of repeating information. The third, and this is the one that kills most attempts, is not maintaining it. Projects change. Processes evolve. Client preferences shift. If The Brain doesn't get updated, it starts giving AI agents outdated context. And outdated context is worse than no context, because the AI will confidently act on information that's no longer true. Maintenance doesn't need to be a big production. Fifteen minutes a week. Update any project files that changed. Add notes from client calls. Refine protocols based on what worked and what didn't. That's it. The Bit Nobody Talks About: Portability The most underrated thing about building The Brain as plain files is that you own it completely. Switch from Claude to GPT? Copy the folder. New team member joins? Give them access to the folder. Agency relationship ends? You keep every file. Compare that to building your processes inside a SaaS tool's proprietary system. When you leave, you leave with an export CSV and a vague memory of how things worked. The Brain is yours. Permanently. It goes where you go. We've had clients ask us about this specifically. "What happens if we stop working together?" You take your Brain with you. Plug it into whatever model or tool you're using next. All the context, all the history, all the refinements, it all transfers. What The Brain Looks Like After Six Months A company that's been maintaining The Brain properly for six months has something most competitors don't. They have a documented record of how every project evolved. Not meeting notes buried in Notion, actual structured context that an AI can read and act on. They have writing protocols that have been refined through dozens of iterations. Their AI outputs are consistent because every session starts with the same standards. Their competitive research is compiled and queryable. Their client history is accessible. Their processes are documented well enough that a new hire, human or AI, can get productive in hours instead of weeks. And the cumulative effect is wild. Session 1 with The Brain is good. Session 50 is something else entirely. The model isn't learning (it still resets every session), but The Brain has absorbed so much refined context that the starting point keeps getting higher. It compounds. Quietly. Every week a little better than the last. We Build These Since this is going to come up anyway: yes, we do build these for clients. Not because the concept is complicated. You've just read how it works. But because the value comes from knowing what to put in them and how to structure it so AI agents actually perform well for your specific business. Which protocols matter for a DeFi project vs. a gaming studio vs. a DAO? How do you structure a Brain that handles five concurrent campaigns across eight time zones? What level of detail in a project file actually improves output quality vs. just eating context window for no reason? That's the bit that takes experience. We've been refining these structures across dozens of Web3 projects and the patterns are very specific to how crypto teams actually operate. If that sounds interesting, fracasdigital.com has our calendar. Or just reply to this post. We're not precious about it. But even if you never talk to us, go build one this week. Pick one project. Write the root file. See what happens to your AI output quality when you give it a proper Brain to work with. You won't go back to cold-starting every session. We guarantee that. Fracas Digital is a Web3 growth agency. We build distribution systems for blockchain projects. The Brain is one of the things we build. The rest is at fracasdigital.com.
🤖 Made with AI
1
2
8
697
bull market: everyone's a builder bear market: everyone's a critic when the price was pumping nobody had time to dunk on your campaign they were too busy checking their portfolio now everyone's broke with nothing to do except quote tweet and complain
1
5
293
Most Web3 campaigns force attention. The smart ones ride attention that already exists. We ran a 17-day watermark campaign for a prop trading platform embedding their logo in viral clip content instead of making ads. Results: 11M+ views 280+ videos across 25+ creators 265K+ likes, 5.8K+ comments The play wasn't immediate conversion, it was familiarity. When someone eventually needs a trading platform, the brand that feels familiar wins. In Web3, attention isn't just marketing It's infrastructure.
1
3
246
15% budget shift. 10x the reach. Move a slice of your KOL spend to clipping distribution. You keep the credibility and conversion layer. But now those messages reach people who've never heard of you. Lower CPMs. Wider audiences. Same core strategy. Here's how:
13
2
1
39
2,589
Content shouldn’t just reinforce the bubble. Distribution is the missing piece. Watch this 👇
15% budget shift. 10x the reach. Move a slice of your KOL spend to clipping distribution. You keep the credibility and conversion layer. But now those messages reach people who've never heard of you. Lower CPMs. Wider audiences. Same core strategy. Here's how:
2
1
8
466
A common mistake we see: Teams jump straight to KOL activation before they’ve earned narrative clarity. Creators don’t create demand. They amplify what already makes sense. If the story isn’t tight, volume just exposes the cracks faster
2
6
322
A product without a narrative is just a landing page with extra steps
5
276
KOL marketing only works when creators are actually incentivised. Otherwise it’s just sponsored noise.
1
6
225
“We’ll go hard post-TGE” ...famous last words
1
2
163
If @paramonoww had to rebuild @hazeflow_xyz from scratch… He wouldn’t change a thing. “The butterfly effect matters, every step shaped what we’ve become" A founder confident in process, not perfection.
2
1
8
490
Every research firm claims to “understand protocols.” @hazeflow_xyz actually does. They ask 40–50 questions across tech, product, and marketing before writing a single word. @paramonoww says the goal is to know a project better than its own team. That’s the standard.
4
1
7
339
If all funding vanished tomorrow… 99.9% of Web3 projects would die. @paramonoww says most teams are addicted to raising, not revenue. Those that’d survive? Ones that were profitable from day one. Money’s the best stress test.
3
1
7
429
You can spot bad projects by page two. Too many buzzwords. No data. Overuse of “transforming” or “empowering" If your whitepaper reads like a poem, not a product, you’ve lost the plot😂 @paramonoww from @hazeflow_xyz has read thousands. He knows.
1
5
357
People think being a dev in crypto is easy. It’s not. - New languages. - Constant pivots. - Unstable tooling. @paramonoww says the biggest mistake people make is underestimating the complexity of building here. If you ship in Web3, you’re already top 1%
1
6
279
Where’s @hazeflow_xyz heading? Still a research firm but evolving into a product that simplifies crypto’s complexity at scale. @paramonoww wants to keep fixing the industry’s biggest problem: Reading 3 pages of a whitepaper and still not knowing what the protocol does.
2
2
11
342
Most crypto teams can build. Few can explain. That’s where @hazeflow_xyz comes in. @paramonoww’s team turns overcomplicated tech into clear messaging that actually lands, for both retail and founders. Because in Web3, if you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it deeply
1
1
12
302