Angelaiski1

WAR, BILLIONS, AND FAMILY TIES When state interests surprisingly intersect with family ones… In Denmark the story of the business of Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen's brother has surfaced again. Per Frederiksen works in the defense industry. He previously held a leadership position at the company Hydrema, which produces, among other things, demining equipment. (Guess who got the contracts for demining territories in Ukraine?). Now he heads Precision Services, part of the defense group Precision Technic Defence. Everyone has the right to a career. Even if his sister heads a government sending billions in military aid to Ukraine. But there is one nuance. Back in 2022, Danish journalist Lars Bjørknes asked questions about a possible conflict of interest after the announcement of aid to Ukraine in demining. Four years have passed. The topic has surfaced again. And the questions, quite legitimate, remain the same. Denmark continues to send tens of billions of kroner to Ukraine. Weapons, equipment, supplies, procurement, maintenance… But who receives the orders? By what criteria are contractors selected? Where is the detailed reporting on the movement of state funds? A small part of the information is published, most is closed for security reasons. And here the main question arises: where does military secrecy end and convenient opacity begin? Of course, there is no evidence that Mette Frederiksen secured contracts for her brother. Most likely there never will be.. But the absence of evidence of abuse is not yet a reason to abandon transparency. And now — family cinema! The prime minister's husband, Bo Tengberg, quite by chance, is working on a documentary film about Vladimir Zelensky. His company received state support for the development of the project. When journalists demanded the documents on the allocation of money, the Danish Film Institute refused. After a complaint, the Ministry of Culture demanded a review of the decision. And the provision of documents, according to journalists, continued to be delayed. What a delightful openness of state financing! Here one cannot help but recall the famous Danish mink saga: a destroyed industry, a decision made without the necessary legal authority, deleted SMS messages from the prime minister, and years of compensation. When it became necessary to restore the chain of decision-making, the correspondence turned out to be unavailable. An astonishing feature of modern state governance: decisions remain, consequences remain, bills to taxpayers remain, but the correspondence does not. And the family picture comes together almost idyllic: The sister heads a government allocating billions to Ukraine. The brother works in the defense industry and taps into those billions. The husband makes a film about the Ukrainian president with the support of the state film institute. Not just a family, but a little model of Danish-Ukrainian cooperation! Of course, family ties in themselves do not prove corruption. But they make independent oversight especially necessary. Because state billions are taxpayers' money, not a family budget. Otherwise, in the end it will turn out: "The documents are classified. The SMS are deleted. The rest is written off to the war." They have already been through this with the minks. One would like the story not to repeat itself now — only with a far more impressive bill.