U80

We’re dividing. Segregating. This is the build up. The next 20 years will completely change this country (or to-be 2 countries). - Both sides have always gerrymandered - Both sides are now extremely gerrymandering, believing they have to because the other side is - Blue states are back-door trying to make the electoral college not relevant. - SCOTUS is heavy red, heavily favoring the GOP - Blue states are poised to ignore SCOTUS because of it - States (both sides) pass there own laws directing their law enforcement to ignore federal laws when federal agencies are in command by the opposite party - Representation will be fully partisan in a couple of years - This will be too much for voters. Red voters in fully blue controlled and gerrymandered states will move to red states. Blue state voters will do the same to blue states Willful segregation. - Intra-state coalitions will be formed (trade, economic frameworks, shared resources, ignoring federal regs, laws, rulings, etc.) - Strength will be in numbers: the more states who join the coalition, the less of a threat the other side (or federal) will be. - Congressional (legislative) laws will be ignored (they have no power to enforce) - Judicial laws will be ignored (they have no power to enforce) - Executive enforcement can only be ignored (they have enforcement power and bodies), once coalitions are built enough to withstand. - Executive branch enforcement will be limited to what the current party in power feels like enforcing. No one standard across the board. - Political opponents will be targeted executively, but protected by the state coalitions. - Eventually, deep blue and deep red states will be fully populated as such, easily noticeable boundaries between the two major sides. - State coalitions will stop their residents from paying federal taxes, protecting them legally and physically - Trade deals between coalitions and supporting foreign entities will commence. - The power of the combined 3 branches of government will become obsolete on a large scale. - Lines will be drawn, the split will be on None of this would require any actual secession from anyone one state. Nor any real shots fired. The US splits, naturally, slowly, figuratively at first then literally, until there’s two ruling sides. It’s breaking.

Interesting. Humans aren’t native to earth? Everything about earth is a detriment to the human species, more than any other species. Thoughts on this? Interesting take or just well done conspiracy theory?

Just so you’re aware of these 2 things: 1. Next Halloween on a Saturday night is 11 years from now. So, depending on your child’s(ren’s) age, may be their last trick or treating on a Saturday eve. 2. Sunday is the official start of Christmas season!

“Ask app not to track?” No. TELL app not to track. I’m not asking.

Shout out to my fellow Xennials out there. IYKYK

lol “We don’t need billionaires! We just need their innovation and products” - the “elite” left. Go figure someone like Reich who creates and offers nothing, wants control of what someone else created, but says those someone else are the problem.

Did you put it all on the line following his prediction? If you did, you’re cashing in big right now lol

The core tension in the Ilhan Omar citizenship problem is straight forward. Her side will emphasize the political motivation (timing before midterms, years public attacks, earlier legal reviews that did not advance). That is their strongest public framing, and it can also support legal arguments of selective or retaliatory prosecution if the evidence looks thin. Courts rarely dismiss solely on motivation when a warrant has a factual basis, but optics and burden of proof still matter. The counterpoint is equal application. If material fraud in the 2000 naturalization process is actually proven, declining to pursue it because she’s a sitting member of congress will create a “rules for thee, not for me” problem. Denaturalization is deliberately hard. Civil cases require clear and convincing evidence of material concealment or misrepresentation, and the criminal statute of limitations has long expired. BUT, citizenship obtained in this way is not meant to be permanent, simply because the person later holds office. Prior inaction does not legally bar a new review, though it does strengthen the “targeting” narrative. Public opinion is already sorted by party lines. Additional facts will mostly be read through those lenses. What remains unseen is the evidence investigators claim to have. Until there are filings, grand jury outcomes, or a clear decision not to proceed, both the “she got away with it” and the “they weaponized the process” conclusions stay speculative. The legal process is supposed to separate those questions from the political ones, even when the political ones are loud. No matter what happens (if anything at all), half the country will claim some sort of foul play. This isn’t a problem with either our legal system or political parties, but more so a product of all of us refusing to look at anything outside of a purely political lense.

“This is the most consequential and most important election of our lifetime” - Politicians/Media/Activists, every election my whole life (I’m 43).

In all the years you’ve seen and eaten this candy, have you ever wondered what “M&M” stands for?

Republicans say democrats will cheat the midterms. Democrats say Trump will cheat the midterms. So no one is ready to accept the results of their side loses..

😲😯😮😵

New Mexico was first colonized and named by two Spanish explorers names Juan de Oñatethe and Francisco de Ibarra. They colonized New Mexico with slaves, even though slavery was restricted by Spanish law. You want to keep the name of a state that was named by slave owners?

Some Commanders stats around Jayden Daniels: Record: When Jayden plays at all: 16-13-1 When Jayden doesn’t play at all: 4-8 When Jayden plays FULL game: 16-9-1 (4 of the 16-13-1 losses Jayden started but didn’t finish the game) Scoring (Team PPG): When Jayden plays at all: 25.7 PPG When Jayden doesn’t play: 23 PPG When Jayden plays FULL game: 27.5 PPG Defense: (PPG scored by opponent) When Jayden plays at all: 25.5 PPG When Jayden doesn’t play: 27.6 PPG When Jayden plays FULL game: 23.7 PPG This shows that when JD5 is sustaining drives, keeping opposing offenses on the bench, those teams score less, giving WAS more of a chance to win, than if another QB is playing for JD5. When Jayden plays a full game: - 62.5 win percentage - 27.5 PPG (currently 6th most in NFL) - 23.7 PPG allowed by defense (currently 20th, better than they are now - last) And, nearly a 4 point difference than opponent scoring, which is difference between a TD and a FG. Keep JD5 healthy.

If you have FSD on and your Tesla is driving for you.. And it speeds and gets you a speeding ticket.. Should Tesla cover the ticket cost?

Better budgeting doesn’t bring prices down, but it helps you manage your money paycheck to paycheck. Don’t add a monthly subscription expense. It’s not hard to properly track it all yourself. Here’s a free starter monthly budget sheet to do just that:

Democratic Socialists: “Corporations and business owners earn their money off the backs of their workers! Exploiting their labor!”

Two things can be true at once. Taxes can be way too high for the majority of us.. While there can also be too many ways on the books for the ultra wealthy to evade taxes.

This is all interesting. Everyone claims to believe no one is above the law, even politicians. But everyone also claims that when a politician faces an investigation, charge, raid and/or arrest by a DoJ that happens to be ran by the other party.. That it’s all politics and abuse of power. Going after political opponents. So what is it, or what should it be? AND two things can be true at once. Politicians can break the law, intentionally and unintentionally. However, a respective DoJ can 100% target someone and try to find something in their past to twist into breaking one of the thousands of federal laws on the books. Politicians love this game, too. They can do whatever they want, figuring if their party is in control of DoJ, they’ll sweep it under the rug, and if the other party controls the DoJ, they’ll claim any investigation/charge is all politics, abuse of power, etc. For voters, it’s apparent that when it’s a politician one doesn’t like, the answer is “no one is above the law.” When it’s a politician they like or support, it’s “this is abuse of power by the DoJ.” So what should it be? Politicians of one party should not be held accountable for their actions, if the other party holds the power of the DoJ? Does it matter that warrants were submitted and signed off on by judges, or are the judges just as compromised as we believe DoJ is? What’s funny is political parties don’t even hide it. For example, democrats today (while Trump is in office) are publicly saying they will use the law to go after everyone in Trump’s administration once they regain control of the executive. Is that ok? Or is it as simple as “well, if they have nothing to hide, they won’t worry about being investigated”..? Was it ok to investigate Trump, but not Ilan Omar? IF Ilhan Omar broke some law, should she not be held accountable, simply because the GOP controls the DoJ right now?

Halloween season is fun and the kids love it. BUT… to me.. Once the months start ending in “ber,” it’s Christmas Season!

Women are more upset with Shane Gillis than Lindsay Clancy.