Chongkai Gao (@GChongkai) header
Chongkai Gao (@GChongkai) profile picture

Visiting PhD student at @StanfordSVL. Working with Prof. @drfeifei. PhD student of NUS. Prev. Tsinghua Univ. Roboticist.

Stanford
Joined August 2021
Photo by Chongkai Gao (@GChongkai)Photo by Chongkai Gao (@GChongkai)Photo by Chongkai Gao (@GChongkai)Photo by Chongkai Gao (@GChongkai)Photo by Chongkai Gao (@GChongkai)Photo by Chongkai Gao (@GChongkai)Photo by Chongkai Gao (@GChongkai)Photo by Chongkai Gao (@GChongkai)Photo by Chongkai Gao (@GChongkai)Photo by Chongkai Gao (@GChongkai)
๐Ÿค–Robots need world models for visual planning, but they don't need to imagine every frame. Introducing DreamCan: Sparse Visual Planning for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation. Project: dreamcan.github.io/ Code: github.com/HeegerGao/DreamCaโ€ฆ Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.24981
15
43
8
288
53,483
Chongkai Gao retweeted
Planners operate on task timescales. Feasibility changes on control timescales. Bridging that gap takes a high-frequency mid-level layer. Introducing EPO: Energy-Based Policy Orchestration #CoRL2026 EPO gives each low-level policy an energy: how feasible a goal is, and how well the policy will reach it. Energies are differentiable and comparable across policies, so EPO optimizes the policyโ€“goal pair at control rate. Unlike a learned MoE router, EPO is compositional: adding a skill means training one new energy, nothing else. It's also more precise and switches policies 7ร— less often, pushing the precisionโ€“robustness frontier. ๐Ÿ“„ Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2611.02546 ๐ŸŒ Project: yewr.github.io/epo ๐Ÿ’ป Code: github.com/YeWR/EPO @wangyenjen @elvis_hsieh77 @frankzydou @ShiboZhaoSLAM @pabbeel @du_yilun @MIT_LISLab
2
11
1
29
1,517
Chongkai Gao retweeted
Alright, alright, alrightโ€ฆ CoRL registration is completely maxed out, with hundreds of people on the waiting list. Please stop flooding my inbox for tickets ๐Ÿ˜‚ You can still join the fun! Our partners are hosting social events all over town. We gathered the list of public events here: corl.org/program/socials Many donโ€™t require a conference badge to attend. Letโ€™s turn Ausitn into a Robotics Party Town!
CoRL is now sold out. We have an incredible program lined up. Can't wait to see y'all in Austin next week! corl.org/program
11
11
2
159
13,392
Chongkai Gao retweeted
๐Ÿฆพ We're generating dexterous robot demonstrations from human data at scale ๐ŸŒŸ Check out our work at Meta Reality Labs Research ๐Ÿ”ฅ Generative Neural Retargeting for Human-to-Robot Dexterous Manipulation ๐ŸŒ Website: yy-gx.github.io/GNR/ ๐Ÿ“š Report: arxiv.org/abs/2610.12440
7
27
6
267
18,553
Chongkai Gao retweeted
The RL era of robotics is here, and simulation is how to scale it. An early look at our research on a achieving a better scaling paradigm for robot learning with simulation ๐Ÿ‘‡
88
163
102
1,565
463,785
Does spatial understanding translate into reliable robot action? Introducing BEHAVIOR-Spatial benchmark: Evaluating Spatial Understanding for Robotics. Built on BEHAVIOR-1K, our benchmark connects three levels of spatial reasoning across shared scenes, objects, and relations: ๐Ÿง  BEHAVIOR-Spatial-VQA (Understand): answer spatial questions ๐ŸŽฏ BEHAVIOR-Spatial-IR (Ground): point to the instructed target ๐Ÿค– BEHAVIOR-Spatial-Action (Act): execute manipulation and navigation tasks Across 3,256 questions, 1,240 grounding queries, and 24 robot tasks, we examine when spatial perception translates into robot behavior. Our key test: keep the training scene fixed and change the instruction. Does the robot switch targets? Our baseline commits to the wrong target in 70% of these probes. Explicit target cues help, but reliable instruction following remains challenging. ๐ŸŽฌ Overview below. Benchmark data, training demonstrations, evaluation tools, and findings in the thread. ๐Ÿงต
3
6
2
31
2,304
Chongkai Gao retweeted
We asked GPT-6 Astra to edit Qwen3.5-0.8B weights to improve math. It directly changed only 0.016% of weights, fixing 0.8B's reasoning loops & improving math up to 6x and even instruction following 3x, without gradients or training. We call this Weight-Space Programming: frontier LLMs can now natively read/write neural network weights! ๐Ÿงต Blog: rikiyat.github.io/blog/weighโ€ฆ
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
LLM was given weights explicitly as text in prompt and used code/forward passes (per authors' logs) to ablate Qwen looping direction, a known thinking-mode issue per model card. Primarily fixed repetition in that mode, not general 'natively' improving weights/math. rikiyat.github.io/blog/weight-spโ€ฆ github.com/RikiyaT/lm_undโ€ฆ huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.5-0โ€ฆ huggingface.co/RikiyaT/Qwen3.โ€ฆ
2,362
7,276
5,729
55,926
9,872,735
Chongkai Gao retweeted
Long-horizon, whole-body robot policies still fail during deployment. How do we best close this last-mile gap? ๐Ÿค– ๐Ÿšจ Introducing I3L: Iterative Interactive Imitation Learning for Whole-Body Mobile Manipulation Website: i-3l.github.io/ Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.17748
8
39
11
213
58,806
Chongkai Gao retweeted
GPT and Claude now operate real robot arms, and they generalize remarkably well. What they lack is speed and low-level control. We introduce FACT, the first cerebellum for robots: high-frequency tactile reasoning, learned from scaled human data with both motion priors and applied forces. Brains will keep getting smarter and keep getting replaced, but the cerebellum couples with whichever brain comes next. 1, Built like a brain and a cerebellum. A coarse planner (the brain) takes images, instructions, robot state, past tracks, and predicts future video, tracks and actions. A force-action refiner (the cerebellum) runs fast, jointly predicting fingertip forces and refines actions using new touch feedback. 2, We collect EgoForce, a human manipulation dataset pairing egocentric video and hand motion with calibrated tactile forces. It spans ~2,000 hours, with 40,000 episodes covering 1,000 tasks performed by 1,000 demonstrators. 3, We pretrain FACT, a multimodal robot System 1 policy, on EgoForce plus robot data, then fine-tune with just 10 robot demos + 90 human demos per task. Across 10 real-world tasks, including pipetting, tool use and playing instruments, FACT outperforms ฯ€0.5 and T-Rex, with gains up to 60 points over T-Rex. 4, Human force supervision makes a substantial difference. Adding force labels to human pretraining unlocks tasks that were previously almost impossible, such as shoelace tying: Test-tube cap opening: 0% โ†’ 80% Flip-cap opening: 10% โ†’ 50% Shoelace tying: 0% โ†’ 20% FACT connects human contact experience to robot execution-from force supervision during pretraining to predicting and responding to contact on the robot. ๐Ÿ“„ Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.19155 ๐ŸŒ Website: fact-1-0.github.io/ Code and dataset coming soon! ๐Ÿงต Thread ๐Ÿ‘‡
8
10
70
69,088
Chongkai Gao retweeted
Human videos bring scale and motion priors to robot pretraining. But video mainly captures human states, leaving intended actions implicit. Applied forces help fill that gap. Introducing FACT: learning dexterous manipulation from human video and force. ๐Ÿงต
5
19
127
6,749
Really cool demo!
(๐ต๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘˜๐‘”๐‘Ÿ๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘›๐‘‘ ๐‘š๐‘ข๐‘ ๐‘–๐‘: ๐‘Ž ๐‘™๐‘–๐‘ก๐‘ก๐‘™๐‘’ ๐‘‘๐‘ข๐‘’๐‘ก ๐‘๐‘™๐‘Ž๐‘ฆ๐‘’๐‘‘ ๐‘๐‘ฆ ๐‘š๐‘’ ๐‘Ž๐‘›๐‘‘ ๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘’ ๐‘Ÿ๐‘œ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘ก ๐‘–๐‘ก๐‘ ๐‘’๐‘™๐‘“ ๐ŸŽถ ๐ธ๐‘›๐‘—๐‘œ๐‘ฆ ๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘’ ๐‘ฃ๐‘–๐‘‘๐‘’๐‘œ ๐‘ค๐‘–๐‘กโ„Ž ๐‘ ๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘›๐‘‘ ๐‘œ๐‘›! ๐Ÿ”Š) Ever dreamed of a robot that could play the harp ๐ŸŽผ, tie your shoelaces ๐Ÿ‘Ÿ, or even perform delicate wet-lab experiments ๐Ÿงช? The key is ๐ฅ๐ž๐š๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ก๐จ๐ฐ ๐ก๐ฎ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž, ๐›๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ก๐จ๐ฐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ž๐ž๐ฅ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐œ๐ž๐ฌ. We introduce ๐…๐€๐‚๐“, a Forceโ€“Actionโ€“Track foundation model that learns from 2,000 hours of force-rich human demonstrations in our EgoForce dataset, bringing us closer to robots with truly human-like dexterity! ๐Ÿฉท๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ’œ arxiv.org/abs/2610.19155 Bigggggg shoutout to @ZhiCao01756604 !
11
848
Chongkai Gao retweeted
๐ŸŒ Actions that condition world models are highly heterogeneous: forces on objects, camera movements, hand motions, robot arms, each with its own meaning and structure. So today's action-conditioned world models are usually built one action type at a time, each with its own conditioning design. We introduce UniAction, a unified action-conditioning framework: one world model driven by all of these actions, and even by mixes of them in a single generation. Trained jointly, it outperforms the action-specific experts. Great work led by amazing @BowenXue_ . More detailed threads below๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿงต 1/10
8
33
1
151
8,727
Replying to @ylecun @GChongkai
Thanks Yann for the comment! We also have an upcoming work that operates in latent state :) But I see them as tradeoffs that offer different capabilities in practice. Regardless of representation (latent, 2D, 3D, etc), the goal for any "imagining" in planning is ultimately to evaluate candidate actions or policies, so the other half of the story is how imagined states can be scored. Image-based representation conveniently shares this interface with VLMs and other pretrained visual tools (like SAM). But they certainly have their downsides too compared to latent representation, like search efficiency (which is actually important for finding novel solutions!)
1
2
19
2,156
One piece of advice from Toru's talk that really stuck with me: be brave. It matters so much nowadays.
How should we approach research, when the very field we work on is going through rapid and potentially fundamental changes? I recently gave a talk at the Stanford Vision Seminar, reflecting on my PhD journey and how AI is changing the way I think about research. I adapted part of it into a new blog post, organized around three questions: 1. What should we work on? 2. How should we work with AI? 3. What is a PhD for? I hope some of my reflections are helpful. The talk ended with an open discussion, and Iโ€™d love to continue it here; curious how others are thinking about these questions. Personally -- as much as there's FOMO, I also think life is very long, and we have time. toruowo.github.io/blog/postsโ€ฆ
6
823
AlphaGo and coding agents need reasoning, so does robotics, which is arguably orders of magnitude harder. But what is the right representation to perform reasoning? Excited to introduce DreamCan, led by @GChongkai ! DreamCan performs sparse visual planning, reasoning over sparse visual frames that are both **reachable** by the robot and **makes progress** towards the task goal, and it can learn this capability from action-free suboptimal videos! Check out Chongkaiโ€™s post for more details ๐Ÿงตโฌ‡๏ธ
๐Ÿค–Robots need world models for visual planning, but they don't need to imagine every frame. Introducing DreamCan: Sparse Visual Planning for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation. Project: dreamcan.github.io/ Code: github.com/HeegerGao/DreamCaโ€ฆ Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.24981
5
14
89
18,104
13/13 ๐Ÿงช Ablations show why the balance matters. LIBERO-Long success: All three terms: 91.2% Without reachability: 78.0% Without task utility: 74.2% Without spacing: 83.8% Useful progress and feasible transitions work best together.
1
1
5
247