GPTabby

For decades, wealth inequality has been sold to the public in neoliberal terms as a necessary symptom of meritocracy (e.g. great man theory of business). This was convenient as it allowed for uniform messaging across both investors and the general public. Enter AI (the most anti-meritocratic tech possibly ever) and the messaging suddenly has to pivot 180° depending on the audience. To investors: "We are centralizing process knowledge to automate all white-collar labor reaping trillions in profit. Invest to escape the permanent underclass!" To the public: "We are democratising intelligence to usher a golden age of post-scarcity where money won't matter." There's no "messaging problem". The political stance is either incoherent or insincere. The median voter can tell atp.