Reciprocity partaker. Karma enjoyer. Pikachu face facilitator. 😎 I derive satisfaction from getting blocked mid-debate as the femcel angrily waves her 🏳️
Joined June 2018
- Tweets4.9K
- Following866
- Followers979
- Likes7.8K
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
"Wenn Sie eine Frauenquote haben, dann diskriminieren Sie Männer. Das ist einfach so. Und ich bin gegen jede Form der Diskriminierung. Für mich zählt die Qualifikation."
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
A statistic that sounds fake but isn't: Not one single white American man born after 1984 has published a work of literary fiction in The New Yorker.
It's not because they stopped writing. It's because The New Yorker has refused to publish them. The publishing industry has blacked out a generation of male writers & then they wonder why boys don't read.
About 70% of publishing professionals are women.
Because agents and editors tend to select books they personally relate to, an increasing number of male authors are being sidelined in the publishing industry, resulting in an overwhelming number of female protagonists on our shelves—and a dearth of male ones.
No wonder young men are no longer reading.
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
We've blasted past "repeal the 19th" and are approaching "women are private property" territory at this point
This quoted post is unavailable.
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
Former Xbox COO Helen Chiang openly wanted to challenge the status quo: subvert games built for male audiences into women’s spaces and push LGBT representation in Minecraft.
Journos are glazing her as a hero, but she was just another parasite in the industry.
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
She demanded 'hard' sex, joked about being gang-raped... then drove her MIT scientist lover to attempt suicide with #MeToo lie. Now read the disgraceful texts that landed her $10m in debt trib.al/IFJSy9a
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
Lila Rose, Kristan Hawkins, and the mainstream pro-life movement will look at this and say that women don’t deserve to be punished for abortion because they don’t know what they’re doing…
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
Sir a second cringy/ terrifying Nathalie Filgueiras giggly heart warming news segment has hit Chovan’s timeline
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
🤯🤬
“God fuck him”
“Rip his balls”
“Need to seal every crack in the coffin”
—This is how two MIT professors talked about their scheme to bring down Dr. David Sabatini. (Kristin Knouse called it Operation Dethrone.) This was an extensive MeToo hoax that was born out of personal and institutional malevolence.
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
The Democratic candidate for the upcoming Ohio governors election, Amy Acton, has a long history of fabricating "attacks" (similar to abuse hoaxers) supposedly targeting her, as well as inventing stories and being an irresponsible, emotionally uncontrolled wreck.
Here's the full context:
BOMBSHELL:
Ohio Democratic gubernatorial candidate Amy Acton’s own mother urges voters not to vote for her daughter.
“My name is Donna Arthur and I’m Amy Acton’s mother. I worked at Children and Family Service Association, building one of the first two sexual abuse programs in America.
I love my daughter, but when I saw her lying about her opponent—and it’s not easy for a mother to say this—but Amy has a serious problem.
She is a liar. She lies about her past. She says she grew up living in a tent. None of that is true. She’s lied her entire life.
My daughter needs help, and she can’t help you if she needs help herself. People can change, but first they have to tell the truth, and my daughter still isn’t doing that.
Don’t vote for people who lie. Don’t let her become your governor. If you think she’ll make your life better, you’re fooling yourself. It will only get worse.”
That’s one hell of an October surprise.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Acton's mother lost custody of her children after years of documented issues, including time spent living in a tent and a spouse who sexually abused her daughter Amy (Acton). Amy Acton's brother has also confirmed this story.
x.com/amyactonoh/sta…
wkbn.com/news/local-new…
time.com/collections/co…
vindyarchives.com/news/2019/aug/…
614now.com/2020/culture/c… actonforgovernor.com/meet-amy/
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
You can cancel an election and ban the winner from running (Romania), you can ban your opponents from ever running again (Hungary), you can threaten to ban the main opposition party and subject it to relentless investigations by the secret police (Germany), you can threaten a ban on the leading presidential candidate and make them wear an ankle monitor (France), every member of your circle can be investigated for corruption (Spain), you can try and cancel local elections because you will lose them (Britain), and you can storm the constitutional court with riot police because you want to control it (Poland).
You can just do all these things. The secret is you just have to be on the right side of the European Commission.
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
This guy is police commissioner and wants men/boys arrested for watching "manosphere" videos and "misogyny". Hey John, do you not believe in equality? Why ZERO focus on misandry? If a woman says she hates men, will she be arrested? Much like how you want to arrest men if they say that about women?
The manosphere and misogyny should be tackled in many ways.
This proposal to adopt a public health approach is interesting and should be explored nationally and locally.
theguardian.com/society/2026…
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES EXPLOSIVE PRIVATE MESSAGES REVEALING COORDINATION BETWEEN KRISTIN KNOUSE AND MIT PROFESSOR SANGEETA BHATIA IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL.
🔱 NEW REVELATION — Court evidence exposes how Knouse and Bhatia privately celebrated Sabatini’s removal, discussed the potential destruction of his professional career, and anticipated the revocation of his @MIT tenure.
An 80-message exchange between Kristin Knouse and MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia, dated August 20–21, 2021, reveals their private reactions immediately following Whitehead Institute and HHMI's severance of ties with Professor @DMSabatini.
The communications contain statements that deserve serious public examination.
🔴 1. “YOU DID IT” — “AND HE’S OUT.”
On August 20, 2021, Bhatia congratulated Knouse:
🔴 “YOU DID IT. You crossed the finish line. It's out in the open. And you're not out in the open. And you're on the faculty. And he's out.”
Knouse responded:
🔴 “You connecting me to Nancy [Hopkins]was the turning point. I will never forget that walk in Lexington.”
🔴 2. “THIS WAS THE OUTCOME I DREAMED OF.”
The following morning, as news coverage spread, Knouse discussed the possibility of Sabatini losing his MIT tenure:
🔴 “Hard to imagine MIT will be left with any choice other than to revoke tenure.”
Bhatia responded:
🔴 “You're right about tenure”
She subsequently wrote:
🔴 “This was the outcome I dreamed of but NEVER certain I would get it.”
Knouse also described her assessment of Whitehead's handling of the matter:
🔴 “And as skeptical as I was of Whitehead's end game, in the end I think the overall process was perfectly executed.”
Bhatia expressed her approval of Whitehead Institute Director Ruth Lehmann:
🔴 “I'm proud of Ruth [Lehmann]”
These exchanges occurred months before MIT's April 2022 tenure-revocation recommendation.
🔴 3. THE PROFESSIONAL CONSEQUENCES — BEYOND WHITEHEAD.
The participants also discussed Sabatini's corporate affiliations and prospects for future employment.
Knouse wrote:
🔴 “I know of one company already speaking with lawyers to remove him on grounds of morality clause.”
She subsequently stated:
🔴 “Hard to imagine how he can be gainfully employed anywhere after the past 24 hours ...”
These were not merely discussions about an institutional investigation. They extended to the potential consequences for Sabatini's career, tenure, corporate affiliations, and future livelihood.
🔴 4. THE DIVERSITY SURVEY AND PROTECTION FROM PUBLIC IDENTIFICATION.
In another particularly consequential exchange, Bhatia wrote:
🔴 “Also the dei survey and subsequent investigation really protects you, which I love. There is not even a scent of whistleblower in all the press.”
This statement takes on particular significance alongside the previously disclosed communications in which Knouse and Nora Kory discussed using Whitehead's diversity survey to conceal an investigation already under consideration (📑 see the original court evidence in the first comment below).
🔴 5. “WE DRANK CHAMPAGNE” — CELEBRATING AS THE NEWS SPREAD.
Perhaps the most striking exchange appears on KK011419.
On August 21, 2021, Knouse declared:
🔴 “I KNOW! Young people took down a relatively young king. Progress, progress, progress.”
Knouse also wrote:
🔴 “Two other women who came forward and I drank champagne while watching the Tweets and articles roll in last night. It felt like campaign headquarters after an election victory. Really special.”
Bhatia responded:
🔴 “That's awesome.”
These exchanges reinforce the serious concerns about coordination and conflicts of interest raised by our previous disclosures. Their significance must be assessed alongside the full documentary record and the subsequent jury verdict.
The scientific community deserves full accountability for any misconduct established by the evidence, including the roles of individuals who participated in or improperly influenced the institutional processes that subjected Professor Sabatini to a devastating ordeal and profoundly damaged his career.
📑 REVIEW THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
🔱 Part 5 — Joint Appendix JA004741: Court evidence reveals reported support and pressure involving senior MIT faculty
🚨 Court documents reveal that Kristin Knouse described support from influential MIT faculty members during the proceedings concerning Professor David M. Sabatini.
⚠️ In messages dated 13 October 2021, Knouse identified support attributed to senior MIT figures and described their willingness to approach MIT President Rafael Reif to influence the institutional outcome.
These communications document efforts to mobilize influential individuals within MIT during Sabatini's tenure-review proceedings.
📑 THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE IS PRESENTED BELOW.
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
Dave Foley was ordered to pay his ex-wife $17,700 a month in child support. That was five times what he actually earned.
If he set foot in Canada, he would be arrested at the border.
When he asked the judge how he’d feed his daughter from his second marriage, he says the court’s answer was simple: “They can rot in hell.”
In 1997, Foley was starring on NBC’s NewsRadio and making about $1 million a year. That year, he separated from his first wife, Tabatha Southey.
An Ontario judge set his payments at $17,700 a month, or $212,400 a year after taxes, based on his sitcom salary.
Two years later, NBC canceled the show. His income dropped by nearly 80%.
He went back to court to lower the payments. The judge said no. The court ruled he had made $1 million once, so he should keep paying like he still did.
His ex-wife lived in a $2.5 million house on a park in Toronto. Foley rented a small loft in downtown LA.
By 2011, he owed more than $500,000 in back payments. Ontario threatened to pull his passport and issued a warrant for his arrest if he came home.
In the video below, Foley explains the math: “I’m paying about five times my income every month in child support, based on a show that hasn’t been on for 12 years.”
He couldn’t work in Canada again until he landed a new sitcom in 2014 and had his paychecks garnished at the source.
The case for the court: a parent shouldn’t get to slash support just because their career slows down.
The case for Dave: locking a canceled actor into 1990s sitcom money under threat of prison is extortion.
Should child support be tied to what you earn today, or the best year you ever had?
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
So all of the women believe Ephesians 5 from Holy Scripture is “weaponized” in terms of submitting.
Good luck men. You have the obligations of a man to lead, provide, protect, lead your household to heaven, but she has no obligation to submit unless she feels like you’re worthy of submission.
Feminism is so deeply weaponized and capitulated to in all of Christianity at this point that I don’t know how to fix it.
Almost no priests, pastors or organizations will stand up to a woman.
Their obligations are based on how they feel. Like a buffet when it comes to obeying Christ and Holy Scripture.
Welcome to Christian dating gentlemen!
Gender Accelerationist retweeted
Happened to meToo, but as a *junior* *untenured* *adjunct professor at UT Dallas in 2016 (before I later got tenured). I didnt have the wealth, prestige & position that @DMSabatini did at MIT. Still fought back & won.
Here is the audio recording of Title IX telling me the student perpetrator (Melissa Vilaga) admitted she lied about the whole thing of false allegations... and asking me to let her back into my Neuroscience class(!) I said heck no, not allowed. Receipts below. youtu.be/XZencBlBMoM
