Generalchad (@Generalchad3) header
Generalchad (@Generalchad3) profile picture
London, England
Joined October 2025
Photo by Generalchad (@Generalchad3)Photo by Generalchad (@Generalchad3)Photo by Generalchad (@Generalchad3)Photo by Generalchad (@Generalchad3)Photo by Generalchad (@Generalchad3)Photo by Generalchad (@Generalchad3)Photo by Generalchad (@Generalchad3)Photo by Generalchad (@Generalchad3)Photo by Generalchad (@Generalchad3)Photo by Generalchad (@Generalchad3)
Generalchad retweeted
Accounts linked to OG Asteroid have recently been trumpeting a so-called "victory": they got our official accounts suspended by pre-emptively registering trademarks and filing mass reports. @AsteroidCoinOG This hollow victory is nothing but a self-deceiving farce that puts the cart before the horse. Far from demonstrating strength, it lays bare their true nature: stealing other people’s achievements, lacking the capacity for fair head-on competition, and resorting to despicable tactics to suppress rivals. 1: Trademark ≠ Copyright — Basic Legal Common Sense Pre-registering a trademark merely completes a registration procedure; it can never alter the original ownership of an IP. The Asteroid character was born from Liv’s hand-drawn cosmic dream. Its full copyright, original ownership and legal charitable leading rights have belonged to @rebeccaperrotto and the Liv's Stargrace Foundation @Liv_Stargrace from the very beginning. Supported by complete creation traces, authentic personal backstories and official charitable filings, we possess an unshakable set of legal credentials. In contrast, their pre-registered trademark has no foundational origin, merely a superficial label forcibly attached afterward. Attempting to seize the name with a hastily registered trademark and falsely accuse the legitimate official accounts holds no legal ground whatsoever. Their ignorance matches their foolish actions. 2: Shying Away From Fair Competition, Resorting Only to Reports and Suppression Daring not to compete with us on core strengths including charitable development, long-term community operation and tangible public welfare outcomes, they instead fixated on trademark squatting, mass reporting and suspending official derivative accounts. This says everything. We are rooted on the BAGS platform. Royalties from every single transaction continuously deliver charitable donations to sick children, spreading Liv’s space dream across the globe. They cannot present any tangible charitable contributions or long-term development roadmaps. Their only so-called achievement is suppressing competitors via reporting, fabricating a false victory by making rival accounts vanish. This is not competition. This is plundering the fruits of someone else’s dream. The OG community has no viable long-term project plans. Their only tactic is sabotaging the legitimate community through malicious reporting, attempting to create an illusion of monopoly with underhanded schemes. They are nothing more than clowns stealing the fruits of Liv’s dream. 3: Accounts May Be Suspended, Yet the Core of the IP Remains Unbreakable They foolishly believe suspending several accounts and registering a handful of trademarks can hinder the foundation’s growth and dismantle the authentic Asteroid community. Accounts can be temporarily restricted by malicious reports, yet the IP rooted in kindness and cosmic dreams can never be stolen. Our global community members who sincerely embrace this charitable mission cannot be divided. Our mission to deliver consistent aid to sick children will never halt because of such petty tricks. Despicable tactics cannot cover up hollow fundamentals. Temporary setbacks will never halt the legitimate community’s march forward. What does not kill you makes you stronger. Carrying Liv’s kindness and dreams, we will march further and firmer than ever before. @elonmusk @X @nikitabier #ASTEROID #BAGS #LivStargraceFoundation
unavailable
12
22
4
64
9,511
Generalchad retweeted
Trading is charity, often much stronger than tokens that simply rely on piggybacking on charity-related concepts. This is the definition of the existence of $Asteroid (bags), and it is also the fundamental reason for the existence of the Liv Foundation. @Asteroid_Bags C&A: 4UeLCRqARmfb6e6KQijtiktqqXUxbfk6jZng7DhuBAGS
3
4
23
1,376
Placing a bounty: Incentivize researchers to investigate and attempt to identify the party behind the activity. These were my main wallets that got drained through screen sharing on telegram @durov 4qSThN4buRDAj78CbBxrwgyQrsSNTtcC4dkeWSEnQDxJ 8R7x8bnqAZ2CyQdRQjdDxRZBYCPK4oFqLsCAGYxmD5jk FHwL3cA4HfcEszD91BvnFXFFX54vSeVP6xffURsyaeZP GjGdC1VEWBy7HQ5gR9seyNQrVLoYYEdZajbGyJNse9aG If anyone can put this together for me He’s sent tokens to @shufflecom @ShuffleUSA and @kucoincom I need proper documentation to give the the local police and @FBIDirectorKash @FBI
CRYPTO SCAMMER ALERT A serial scammer is draining wallets using social engineering on Telegram, Zoom, and X Over $2M+ stolen since 2022 Spread the word to stop this scammer! @zachxbt, please take a look and investigate🧵👇
11
7
2
74
34,030
Generalchad retweeted
得到可靠的消息预计最早下周一 SPACE X将会再次发射星舰 而 $ASTEROID 作为SPACE X的吉祥物,按照身为吉祥物的逻辑来说:每次星舰发射都会有它的影子,吉祥物的定义本身,不就是保平安、祝福、幸运等之类的精神层次的东西吗 SPACE X的每次星舰发射, $ASTEROID 都会以精神方面的方式跟随星舰发射到外太空,这应该才是吉祥物该干的事 @Asteroid_Bags C&A: 4UeLCRqARmfb6e6KQijtiktqqXUxbfk6jZng7DhuBAGS
2
13
1
44
2,961
Generalchad retweeted
行情不好的时候,我们到底在坚持什么? 是Liv的梦想,是患病儿童的希望,是基金会能继续发展下去,也是一份对普世价值观最基本的坚守 但我不会否认一件事:我们也是为了赚钱,为了这个东西能涨很多倍。这一点不需要遮遮掩掩。赚钱和选一个能给社会和Web3带来正向价值的项目,这两件事从来不冲突,何乐而不为 现在市场上那些名人币是怎么操作的,先制造FOMO,市场都还没反应过来,市值已经被拉上天了。然后名人开始发一条意味深长的推文,散户高潮,一拥而上。名人效应和庄家配合得天衣无缝,专门用来骗散户接盘。现在价格都成什么样了,多少人被套在山顶上。如果这不是一场精心设计的收割,我是不信的 所以认真找了一圈,现在市场上,从叙事、从价值观的角度,我真的选不出第二个比Asteroid更值得、更有实际意义的项目了 我也不想再玩PVP了,说实话累了。散户在这种游戏里从来赚不到钱,大赢特赢的永远是那几个提前埋伏好的人 归根结底,我也不想再被人拿着一条推文操控情绪了。名人币买少了没意思,买多了睡不着觉,还要天天担心被瞬间收割 —— 一条推文就能决定我钱包里资金的生死,这事本身就很荒唐。更恶心的是,被割完之后,散户居然还要对人家感恩戴德。这难道就是Web3 ? 我选择坚守建设 $ASTEROID 不是因为它一定能让我暴富,是因为它能让我的资金相对安全,我不用担心各种大割的操作,同时对倍数我也可以满怀期待 不管从价格空间,从翻倍潜力,还是从道德立场,从版权合法性,从社会价值,还是吉祥物属性 —— 这个项目每一项都站得住脚,都经得起推敲 我选择建设一件真实存在、经得起时间检验的事 参与长期叙事才能不被轻易pvp 参与正向反馈的叙事才容易出圈 ✨🎗️🙏 坚持做正确的事❤️ #ASTEROID #BAGS #Liv
8
16
45
1,202
Cute :) 4UeLCRqARmfb6e6KQijtiktqqXUxbfk6jZng7DhuBAGS
🤖 Made with AI
2
4
34
1,608
Generalchad retweeted
Yesterday, I received the #Asteroid plush sent by @rebeccaperrotto Liv’s mother. I’ve already thanked Rebecca privately, and she has received the heartfelt thank-you video from my nephew. Although Liv is no longer with us, her dream of helping more children lives on. Rebecca is working to carry that dream forward through the Liv Fund—turning grief into hope and bringing love and support to children and families in need. Thank you, Rebecca, for the thoughtful gift and for the trust you’ve continued to place in this community. I also hope that everyone who cares about Liv and #Asteroid will consider supporting the Liv Fund in whatever way they can. Whether it’s a donation or simply a few words of encouragement, every act of kindness has the potential to change a child’s life. @ResethO @loveartdeco @MichaelLerro also received gifts from Liv’s mother. What deserves to be remembered is not just a token, but the people and the story behind it. ❤️ For Liv, and for a brighter future for more children.
30
42
3
138
10,496
Memes don’t matter about what type of market it is or what btc is doing
1
3
60
Generalchad retweeted
ETH ethereum:0xf280b16ef293d8e534e370794ef26bf312694126 盗版害人不浅 一个阴险展展,一个莽夫李平 他们不仅夺走了本该属于 Liv 基金的版税手续费收入,伤害了一位刚刚失去女儿的母亲 又导致很多人亏损几十万上百万美元 建设都要偷偷默默搞二次创作的币,主流交易所不会轻易上线存在版权争议的项目。面对如此庞大的套牢盘,又有谁愿意接盘?
45
31
83
6,723
【SOL太空狗专题Space第40期】: 本场Space北京时间【今天(6.23)】下午3点准时开始,欢迎大家来一起听听、聊聊。 @Asteroid_Bags 主要议题: 1. 【接上一期】老马圈子web2大佬、Nasa高管、Space核心成员等对ETH太空狗和SOL太空狗的态度区别以及与Liv妈妈互动情况(包括与Liv基金会相关推文互动情况) 2. SOL太空狗社区建设进展,okx、bn钱包logo更新、6.16的基本面质变逻辑等。 SOL ca: (区分ETH太空狗,Dyor.) 4UeLCRqARmfb6e6KQijtiktqqXUxbfk6jZng7DhuBAGS 社区推特: @Asteroid_Bags 社区TG群:t.me/asteroid_bags1 英文TG群:t.me/AsteroidOnBags Space链接↓ teapawt.net/i/spaces/1RKZzzeLWXmKB
5
11
1
25
3,505
Asteroid这只柴犬的设计版权,属于创作者Liv本人,她离世后,按照版权法的遗产继承规则,归属于她的母亲Rebecca,SpaceX因为官方吉祥物的身份,持有相关的商标权。 也就是说,这个IP的全部合法主张,集中在两个主体手里:Rebecca的版权,SpaceX的商标权。除此之外,任何项目都不天然拥有使用这个IP的资格,想要有大的发展就必须获得版权所有人的认可或默许。 Rebecca的态度已经非常明确:她多次主动领取BAGS版 $ASTEROID 的版税 @Asteroid_Bags ,公开承诺将其用于建立以Liv命名的慈善基金会 @Liv_Stargrace ,并且主动把claim账户更改为与基金会合作的专业平台The Giving Block,这一整套动作,是她本人用实际行为做出的认定。 所以SOL版 $ASTEROID 为什么比其他版本更接近版权和合法性的核心,答案已经不需要争论
“群体追求和相信的从来不是什么真相和理性,而是盲从、残忍、偏执和狂热,只知道简单而极端的感情” “ 个体为了获得群体的认同,往往会抛弃是非,选择用智商去换取那份让人倍感安全的归属感 ” —《乌合之众》 币圈社会中如果只是以“市值判是非”,“以人数多少判对错” 抛去对项目叙事本身的独立思考和价值判断,我们的选择最终也会逐渐狭隘和失智 “守住独立思考,不被群体降智” ——————————— 越来越多的案例已经证明一件事:真正能长期发展的Meme币,绕不开版权这一关 Pepe获得了版权所有人的认可,才走出了更稳健的发展路径。Neiro项目官方宣布通过与Own the Doge的合作,正式获得Neiro IP的独家许可。反过来,罗永浩同名代币、奶龙、Labubu同名代币,往往只需要本人或权益方的一句声明,甚至不需要正式的律师函,各大交易所就会不约而同地隐藏处理 这不是哪个社区的判断,这是整个行业已经形成的共识:版权问题不是可以靠"我们是二次创作"或者"meme不需要版权"这种说法绕过去的,它是一个项目能不能长期存在的关键标准,掩耳盗铃、自欺欺人式的规避最后只能说扳起起石头砸自己的脚 回到 ASTEROID 这个故事,谁拥有合法性,其实从一开始就很清楚 Asteroid这只柴犬的设计版权,属于创作者Liv本人,她离世后,按照版权法的遗产继承规则,归属于她的母亲Rebecca,SpaceX因为官方吉祥物的身份,持有相关的商标权。 也就是说,这个IP的全部合法主张,集中在两个主体手里:Rebecca的版权,SpaceX的商标权。除此之外,任何项目都不天然拥有使用这个IP的资格,想要有大的发展就必须获得版权所有人的认可或默许。 Rebecca的态度已经非常明确:她多次主动领取BAGS版 $ASTEROID 的版税,公开承诺将其用于建立以Liv命名的慈善基金会,并且主动把claim账户更改为与基金会合作的专业平台The Giving Block,这一整套动作,是她本人用实际行为做出的认定。 所以SOL版 $ASTEROID 为什么比其他版本更接近版权和合法性的核心,答案已经不需要争论,它写在发生的事实里: 唯一获得Rebecca本人认可和主动参与的版本,资金流向清晰,由专业第三方机构The Giving Block经手,这两个强力背书全程可查。最贴近这个故事原本的叙事和精神,没有篡改设计、没有规避版权的反复说辞 我们支持这个项目,是为了赚钱,这一点不需要回避,也没有必要回避。但赚钱和做对的事,从来不是对立的。一个贴近真实叙事、获得家属认可、没有版权隐患、同时还能持续为基金会提供帮助,拯救患病儿童和支持太空梦想的项目 —— 这件事本身就是多赢的,没有理由不去做 但真的令我不舒服的一件事是 这段时间,我们看到了大V,仗着自己的影响力,向交易所平台施压,要求恢复一个存在侵权争议的标签,平台最终也确实做出了让步。我们也看到了社区,仗着自己市值更高、声量更大,反过来指责一个获得了原创者家属亲自认可的版本是"分流狗" 即使他们支持的项目在一开始就被版权所有人表态:“It’s so frustrating. 😩” 他们依然可以趾高气昂,冠冕堂皇的标榜正统,试问?如果是马斯克说 “It’s so frustrating.” 他们又会如何表态?这难道不是一种大户抱团之下的恃强凌弱吗?这难道不是散户的蒙眼跟风和自欺欺人的投机吗?“ 群体追求的从来不是真相,而是盲从、残忍与狂热的情绪狂欢 ” 这是彻头彻尾的颠倒黑白,也是对事实最基本的罔顾,这是令人感到愤怒和可悲的行为,这也是对事实不尊重和虚伪的表现【诚邀其他社区来我们Space空间我们抛开所谓的互相攻击,抛开市值,抛开虚假宣传,来纯理性的探讨“对错”和是非观念】 一个项目市值更高,不代表它在版权和合法性上就站得住脚。一个声音更大、施压能力更强的用户,也不代表它的主张就是正确的。如果"谁的声音大、谁的资金多,市值高,谁就能定义对错",这个行业谈何进步,市场将会陷入无尽的虚假和操控,散户毫无生存空间 我们没有要求所有人都站在我们这边,我们只是想说一件很朴素的事:事实不会因为谁的影响力更大而改变,版权不会因为谁的市值更高而转移,正确的事情,不会因为被施压、被攻击、被扣帽子,就变成错误的。 坚持做正确的事,从来不是一句口号,是在所有这些压力和噪音面前,依然选择站在事实这一边,依然敢于挑战多数人的错误 参与长期叙事才能不被轻易pvp 参与正向反馈的叙事才容易出圈 ✨🎗️🙏 坚持做正确的事❤️ #ASTEROID #BAGS
23
27
2
52
6,719
Generalchad retweeted
ETH ethereum:0xf280b16ef293d8e534e370794ef26bf312694126 成功激起了我的斗志,越来越有意思了,玩到现在已经跟钱无关了,对面放心别指望我哪天不斗了,我会斗到底。 Liv基金人家母亲用Sol #Asteroid 手续费做慈善,必须送抢Liv基金权益的归零。 社区有个人说了一句话很好 (我们社区每一次战斗未来都可能挽救一条生命,没有比这个更值得战斗的事情)
38
29
4
80
5,201
Generalchad retweeted
感谢 #binance @cz_binance 尊重了Liv ,尊重了Liv母亲,尊重了版权 币安钱包已经将ETH的两个 ethereum:0xf280b16ef293d8e534e370794ef26bf312694126 与Liv和spaceX无关的简介更改,已经从简介中删除了这两个无关的信息。 仅保留了sol $Asteroid 的SpaceX与Liv基金关联的简介,感谢币安选择了对的立场。
43
46
4
114
17,708
Generalchad retweeted
Saving Lucy: A Veteran’s War Dog Deserves Better Than Bureaucratic Euthanasia In the unforgiving deserts near the border of the Islamic State, a stray dog found unlikely salvation in a U.S. soldier. @brendanmjones a veteran who deployed ten times across Yemen, Iraq, and the Horn of Africa, bonded with her amid the chaos of war. He brought her home to Virginia, where for a decade she became a loyal family companion, protecting the household during further deployments, comforting children, and embodying the quiet resilience of those who survive what others cannot. Her name is Lucy. At 11 years old, she now sits in a Shenandoah County animal shelter, confused and alone, facing possible euthanasia over a technicality that reeks of neighborly vendetta and bureaucratic overreach. The backstory is as heartbreaking as it is familiar to anyone who’s watched petty local disputes spiral. About a year ago, while recovering from surgery, bandaged, medicated, and wearing a cone, Lucy reacted defensively when a jogger’s arm reached inside her limited field of vision. It was a single nip, immediately released. The jogger was willing to move on. But others in the neighborhood, amid what Jones describes as two years of harassment, Facebook gossip groups, and repeated police calls over minor complaints, seized on it to push for Lucy to be labeled a “dangerous dog.” Weary from the toll on his family, Jones acquiesced to the designation. It was a mistake. Virginia’s rules for such dogs are strict: special restraints, signage, insurance, muzzling in public. Then came the morning when Lucy’s collar slipped off in her own yard on their 6+ acre property. She barked at a passerby, the same hostile neighbor, before Jones quickly recaptured her. No one was hurt. She never left the property. Yet animal control descended, seized the dog in front of his devastated children, and issued a misdemeanor summons. This isn’t public safety. It’s a weaponized technicality. Dogs bark in yards across America every single day. An elderly family pet with a clean decade-long record at home, who survived war zones, Bedouins, and stray packs, does not suddenly become a menace because equipment failed for seconds on private land. The “dangerous dog” label, born from a medicated post-surgery reaction and neighbor pressure, has now trapped a veteran’s companion in a system primed for the worst outcome. Jones served his country honorably. He faced real threats overseas. Coming home to find the very system he defended turning on his family dog, while a litigious neighbor allegedly gloats, feels like a betrayal of the social contract. Veterans already carry invisible wounds; this adds insult, stripping away one of the few living links to his service and a source of comfort for his wife and kids. Stories like this expose how “zero tolerance” animal control policies, combined with local feuds, can destroy lives without proportionality. No one disputes the need for rules around truly aggressive dogs. But context matters. Lucy’s incident history is minimal and mitigated. She’s 11, hardly a spring puppy posing an ongoing threat. The response should be education, better fencing, or mediation, not impoundment and a death sentence hanging over her head. Public outcry has been swift and heartening: petitions, calls to the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s office, donations pouring into legal funds, and the hashtag #SaveLucy spreading far beyond Virginia. Supporters worldwide recognize the injustice, a war survivor punished for human pettiness. As Jones faces his June 12 hearing, the message should be clear to Shenandoah County officials: Return Lucy home. Drop the disproportionate charges. Let this veteran and his family heal without losing a member who earned her peace the hard way. Bureaucracy has no business ending the life of a dog who outlasted ISIS. Lucy survived deserts, war, and uncertainty once before. Bring her home, where she belongs, on the rug with her people.
2
15
1
29
934
Generalchad retweeted
Replying to @CapitalistOG
Definitely would use it to #SaveLucy Know these are the types of projects you like to be involved in and would appreciate your support, own in on board and would help to get More eyes!! GNL7MQSzzksbfuquHTJuiDPVXvXpfxBfHfu1mQGhpump
4
7
11
133
This was the most embattled I've felt on any Memorial Day that I can remember, at least while CONUS. It is also our anniversary, which made it all the more difficult. But then I got to come home to this. There's nothing like a wagging tail to lift sagging spirits. #SaveLucy
43
145
7
643
11,349
Generalchad retweeted
Saving Lucy: A Veteran’s War Dog Deserves Better Than Bureaucratic Euthanasia In the unforgiving deserts near the border of the Islamic State, a stray dog found unlikely salvation in a U.S. soldier. @brendanmjones , a veteran who deployed ten times across Yemen, Iraq, and the Horn of Africa, bonded with her amid the chaos of war. He brought her home to Virginia, where for a decade she became a loyal family companion, protecting the household during further deployments, comforting children, and embodying the quiet resilience of those who survive what others cannot. Her name is Lucy. At 11 years old, she now sits in a Shenandoah County animal shelter, confused and alone, facing possible euthanasia over a technicality that reeks of neighborly vendetta and bureaucratic overreach. The backstory is as heartbreaking as it is familiar to anyone who’s watched petty local disputes spiral. About a year ago, while recovering from surgery, bandaged, medicated, and wearing a cone, Lucy reacted defensively when a jogger’s arm reached inside her limited field of vision. It was a single nip, immediately released. The jogger was willing to move on. But others in the neighborhood, amid what Jones describes as two years of harassment, Facebook gossip groups, and repeated police calls over minor complaints, seized on it to push for Lucy to be labeled a “dangerous dog.” Weary from the toll on his family, Jones acquiesced to the designation. It was a mistake. Virginia’s rules for such dogs are strict: special restraints, signage, insurance, muzzling in public. Then came the morning when Lucy’s collar slipped off in her own yard on their 6+ acre property. She barked at a passerby, the same hostile neighbor, before Jones quickly recaptured her. No one was hurt. She never left the property. Yet animal control descended, seized the dog in front of his devastated children, and issued a misdemeanor summons. This isn’t public safety. It’s a weaponized technicality. Dogs bark in yards across America every single day. An elderly family pet with a clean decade-long record at home, who survived war zones, Bedouins, and stray packs, does not suddenly become a menace because equipment failed for seconds on private land. The “dangerous dog” label, born from a medicated post-surgery reaction and neighbor pressure, has now trapped a veteran’s companion in a system primed for the worst outcome. Jones served his country honorably. He faced real threats overseas. Coming home to find the very system he defended turning on his family dog, while a litigious neighbor allegedly gloats, feels like a betrayal of the social contract. Veterans already carry invisible wounds; this adds insult, stripping away one of the few living links to his service and a source of comfort for his wife and kids. Stories like this expose how “zero tolerance” animal control policies, combined with local feuds, can destroy lives without proportionality. No one disputes the need for rules around truly aggressive dogs. But context matters. Lucy’s incident history is minimal and mitigated. She’s 11, hardly a spring puppy posing an ongoing threat. The response should be education, better fencing, or mediation, not impoundment and a death sentence hanging over her head. Public outcry has been swift and heartening: petitions, calls to the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s office, donations pouring into legal funds, and the hashtag #SaveLucy spreading far beyond Virginia. Supporters worldwide recognize the injustice, a war survivor punished for human pettiness. As Jones faces his June 12 hearing, the message should be clear to Shenandoah County officials: Return Lucy home. Drop the disproportionate charges. Let this veteran and his family heal without losing a member who earned her peace the hard way. Bureaucracy has no business ending the life of a dog who outlasted ISIS. Lucy survived deserts, war, and uncertainty once before. Bring her home, where she belongs, on the rug with her people.
9
19
1
50
709
Generalchad retweeted
关于 $Asteroid 的经历,以及近期自身生活经历的一些人性思考,有些人他宁愿失去这个生命,他都不愿意去思考,这句话不是我说的这是罗素说的。 但是思考这个东西到底什么样的思考? 比如说独立思考,逆向思考,理性思考,跨学科思考? 一个人当他开始思考的时候,他其实就是段永平说的悟了,他不能通过别人,就是你看书或怎么样就获得了,只能通过你思考悟,而这个悟,其实某种程度就是你的思考。 而这个思考又有很多差别了,比如说逆向思考,这个逆向思考很宝贵,比如说市场非常高亢的时候,你能保持一个冷静,跟大众不一样,或者非常低迷的时候,你能够不一样,这叫逆向思考。 而逆向思考最大的敌人是什么呢?就是我们的心理,因为你逆向思考,你逆的是大众, 你要想想,我们在人类漫长的进化历史过程中,我们天生是保持跟大众一致的,跟集体保持一致的。 为什么? 我要保护好自己,如果我不跟集体保持一致,那集体就会抛弃我,我为了保护自己不被集体所抛弃,我就必须跟集体保持一致,是不是? 这就所谓的乌合之众,这就是所谓的从众思维,羊群效应。 但是在这个加密货币市场上,其实需要的是逆向思考,很多时候一些伟大的下注,它都是由于逆向思考,但因为你跟大众要保持一致,所以你很难保持这个逆向思考,很难做到这个逆向思考。 当你逆向思考的时候,你会很恐惧,这个恐惧是源于什么呢? 源于你害怕被群体所抛弃,而且你像狼群也好,还是什么一些动物群体,一旦脱离了这个群体,很快就出现危险了,所以这是刻在我们的基因里面的。 所以当你要逆向思考,其实是在跟基因对抗。 所以就很难去做到那种在市场非常非常惨的时候,你敢下注,在市场非常高亢的时候,兴奋的时候,你能够远离,能够飘然而去。 你做不到,你只愿意跟大家保持一样。 所以这个逆向思考,难是难在这两个地方。 但是逆向思考不代表任何时候都是对的事情逆向思考它不是一个绝对正确的思考方式就是有时候你跟大众不一样,你有可能是错的,所以逆向思考之上的有一个思考叫理性思考。 如果一个人能时时刻刻做到理性思考的话,他一定是一个逐渐看到本质,能够悟到的人。 理性思考是非常难的,为什么它比逆向思考更加难? 因为它遇到的敌人更多,第一个敌人肯定还是大众,大众是这样,你不那样,还有情绪是个敌人,还有权威也是敌人。 权威为什么是敌人呢? 因为很多人很崇拜这些偶像、这些重量级的大佬,他说什么,我就是什么,他会有权威效应的影响。 所以理性思考有三个敌人: 权威是敌人,大众是敌人,还有自己的情绪欲望是敌人。 所以理性思考很难。 查理芒格说,他一生的成功,两个字概括就是理性,所以理性思考是比较难的。 理性思考跟王阳明说的致良知,是一个意思。 跟大学里面的正心,也差不多是一个意思。 跟教员说的实事求是,也是一个意思。 所以理性很难。 所以你要做到理性,肯定是要做到独立思考,理性思考之前,要有个独立思考。 什么叫独立思考? 段永平也好,还是其他人也好,他说的东西是他的,如果他的东西,我们没有经过自己独立思考过,独立推理论证过,独立用心去切己体察过,这个东西都不是我的,都是他们的。 但是我经过这番推理,体察,反复琢磨,在遇到事情的时候,我能够用上它,这个东西就慢慢变成你自己的了。 这就是独立思考。 只有经过独立思考,你才能够达到理性思考的境界,所以独立思考,就是独立于权威,独立于群体,你能保持自己的状态我们它是通向理性思考的一个桥梁。 从来没见过一个不独立思考的人,他能做到理性思考,逆向思考,独立思考,理性思考,这是这么一个关系。 它不一样,它其实不是一个词汇,不是一个意思。 如果说你做了这种的话,你就肯定会慢慢地不断强大起来。 你做的决策,就大部分时候很容易是对的。 所以理性是一个致良知的状态,也是教员说的实事求是的状态。 所以这个实事求是其实也很难的。 实事求是,你看到很多人他说实事求是,但是当他年纪大的时候,或者说情绪化的时候,或者受到某种利益驱动的时候,他就不实事求是了。 所以实事求是也好,理性也好,就是尊重客观规律,不要让自己的主观臆断去影响它。 也是孔子所说的: 勿意,勿必,勿固,勿我,当一个人做到勿意,勿必,勿固,勿我的话,他就是平常心了,他就很容易达到理性思考的状态,他就很容易达到致良知的状态。 你看段永平说的平常心,查理芒格说的理性,大学里面学的正心,孔子说的勿意勿必勿固勿我,王阳明说的良知。 它是一个意思。 它可以搭这个桥梁,大家去理解它,就没有那么玄之又玄的东西。 它都是非常能够落地的东西,包括知行合一。 当你心中处在一个理性的状态,没有情绪,没有受到外界各种欲望,嫉妒心影响的时候,你这时候就达到知行合一的状态。 当你知跟行合一的时候,就是致良知。 所以这个都是相通的,它没有什么玄学的地方,它是非常落地的。 当一个人内心出现这种状态的时候, 一定是正确的,也是强大的。
11
20
4
57
8,230
Generalchad retweeted
A lot of people are still asking: “If only one ASTEROID version eventually becomes the true breakout listing candidate for major exchanges like Binance, which one will the market choose?” ☄️ In my opinion, the market is slowly showing the answer already. ETH ASTEROID may still continue to rise. But increasingly, it feels like: • a narrative that has already been heavily priced in • a much larger market cap • more limited upside from current levels • and significantly higher early-holder sell pressure. Meanwhile, ASTEROID on BAGS is in a completely different position. A narrative with: • a much smaller market cap • rapidly growing attention • early-stage community expansion • continuous new CEX listings • and most importantly: direct connection to the Liv Foundation and the emotional ecosystem surrounding SpaceX/Musk culture. And this is what major exchanges actually care about. Because in crypto, exchanges don’t only look at volume. They look at: • viral potential • community retention • narrative upside • media expansion potential • and how “fresh” the story still feels. A token that: • already has a very large valuation before listing • has massive early-holder concentration • and carries heavy sell pressure …is often NOT the ideal listing candidate for exchanges that want strong post-listing momentum. On the other hand, a token with: • a smaller market cap • expanding narrative • rapidly growing community • and massive remaining upside …is far more attractive for tier-1 exchanges. That’s why many holders believe: if ASTEROID eventually reaches: • Binance • OKX • Coinbase • Bybit • or other major exchanges, the version with the highest probability of becoming the primary market winner could very well be: ASTEROID on BAGS. ☄️ Especially because this narrative has a massive advantage: the emotional circle surrounding: • Liv • the Liv Foundation • SpaceX culture • Elon Musk • and the dream of space. If Elon or people connected to the SpaceX ecosystem ever publicly acknowledge or support the Liv Foundation, this narrative could accelerate extremely fast. And that’s why many believe: the market is still incredibly early on BAGS. Not financial advice. #ASTEROID #BAGS #SpaceX #Binance #Solana
🤖 Made with AI
4
14
2
46
1,778
Generalchad retweeted
I heard that when many people prayed for Liv, she could feel it in heaven…🌠✨🙏 My friends and I specially made this video and song for you and her, dedicated to Liv's eternal dream of space travel, and to your unwavering yet tender and loving motherly love. Together, we pass on the light of love to her, and to you. I hope this little gift warms your heart. ❤️ @rebeccaperrotto
56
58
5
124
14,393