Giulia Cabbai (@GiuliaCabbai) profile picture

Postdoctoral Research Fellow | @imagingneuroucl.bsky.social, previously @sussex.ac.uk | Mental imagery, spontaneous thoughts, @giuliacabbai.bsky.social

Joined November 2012
So happy to see our paper finally out in @CurrentBiology ! 🥳 Link: cell.com/current-biology/ful…
7
47
1
243
31,131
Aware and Alive: ASSC27 Satellite Symposium on Embodied and Phenomenological Perspectives on Consciousness sites.google.com/view/awarea…
1
6
2
10
6,172
This spontaneous imagery rating was followed by ratings of voluntary imagery experience of the same sounds. In a second scanning part, participants listened to all sounds again, but this time while voluntarily conjuring visual images of the sound content.
1
4
478
Taken together, these results thus show that, while V1 is not sufficient for the subjective experience of imagery, precuneus appears to play a key role in its presence.
1
7
403
Special thanks to my amazing collaborators, Chris Racey, Julia Simner, Carla Dance, @JamieWardSussex and @SophieForster!😊
6
374
Before this “passive listening” part we instructed participants to just listen to the sounds, without mentioning imagery at all. At the end of this part, participants received a surprise question: “Did you experience spontaneous visual imagery while listening to the sounds?”.
1
5
276
To induce spontaneous imagery in the scanner, we first played to our blindfolded participants a series of natural sounds (e.g., dog barking, cat meowing, traffic cars noise, etc) selected via previous pilot studies for their ability to induce visual imagery.
1
6
256
Indeed, lacking the ability to generate imagery on demand does not exclude that someone might still experience imagery or generate its associated sensory representation when triggered automatically. For this reason, we looked at both spontaneous and voluntary forms of imagery.
1
6
343
However, we considered that our main question could not be answered by just employing voluntary imagery paradigms, which have dominated the imagery literature.
1
5
208
We therefore tested for both the presence of decodable sensory representations in primary visual cortex as well as subjective experience in 26 visualisers and 24 aphantasics.
1
5
214
The association assumption is challenged by neurological case studies and recent non-clinical evidence showing that people who cannot experience imagery at will (aphantasics) show preserved performance in tasks considered to involve internal visual cortex representations.
1
5
222
However, it is unclear how these relate to a core facet of imagery: subjective experience. Indeed, many neuroimaging studies only measured the sensory component, assuming subjective experience would co-occur under instructions to imagine or during certain tasks eg mental rotation
1
5
249