Technology & Pop Culture Geek. Xbox gamer. Comic Book reader. Sports lover. Rugby obsessive. Dragons RFC & Abercarn RFC. https://teapawt.net/t.co/xgMJ0wx2Bm
Newport
Joined March 2009
- Tweets208K
- Following5.9K
- Followers2.3K
- Likes259K
Gregg 🏴 retweeted
So ICYMI, the same man who thought Alaskans couldn't tell the difference between two Dan Sullivans, himself couldn't tell the difference between two Dana Whites....
Gregg 🏴 retweeted
As a result of this ridiculous mixup, DoD Dana White now can't be offered the job since that would reveal Trump's imbecility. She dodged a bullet.
Gregg 🏴 retweeted
Reform UK have been the official opposition inside the Welsh Parliament for 6 months.
In that time Reform Senedd Members have been absent from almost as many committee meetings as every other party combined.
To mark six months since the Senedd election, my news letter carried out a deep-dive look inside the Reform UK group within the Welsh Parliament.
We have spoken to Reform Senedd Members, staffers and seen inside WhatsApp groups.
Full story in my pinned tweet.
Gregg 🏴 retweeted
Trump last week: Thinks voters are too stupid to tell two Dan Sullivans apart.
Trump today: Too stupid to tell two Dana Whites apart.
Gregg 🏴 retweeted
Here's the moment on Steve Bannon's election night livestream when they realize not only is Paxton losing but Abbott as well.
Gregg 🏴 retweeted
Apparently “Dana W. White” who ran public affairs for Sec Def was recommended on a short list for Trump to put as Press Secretary.
Trump has instead announced “Dana White” of the UFC as Press Secretary with our Dana having any idea.
JFC!
Gregg 🏴 retweeted
He said no because the job was supposed to be offered to “Dana W. White” a qualified Republican press and comms person with decades of experience…
This is a parody account, right?
RIGHT?
Surely this is parody?
Here is what appears to have happened, based on an in-depth analysis of voter turnout trends.
Socialists imported millions of people into states where their candidates needed to win.
They found people who had lived in the state for years but had not voted in a long time.
They created fake IDs for them.
Then they voted for the socialist candidates using those fake IDs.
Most of them were non-citizens who were in this country legally.
Republican turnout stayed consistant.
Democrat turnout increased by millions.
You can confirm this data.
Gregg 🏴 retweeted
My favorite new conspiracy theory is Dems rigging voting across Texas counties where all local, state, and federal election officials are Republican
These deluded clowns will never understand why they lost as long as they persist with this absolute nonsense.
Beyond parody. Absolute fools.
Everything that's wrong with America. People like Bill here will always be the problem.
We don't need to prove fraud everywhere - only in Texas.
If there were fraud and we can prove the means by which it was done there, the same means may possibly be applied everywhere.
HOW LONG DO WE HAVE?:
How long does anyone have to CHALLENGE the Texas election results? Here's the simple version!
STEP 1: Every county certifies its results within 14 days. This year that deadline was November 17.
STEP 2: The state certifies statewide and congressional races between November 21 and December 7. The GOVERNOR signs off on these.
STEP 3: After that, a losing candidate has 45 DAYS to file a challenge in court. That puts most deadlines in JANUARY.
Recounts are a separate track and much faster - the deadline is just days after a race is certified. ⏱️
And no, this isn't like a presidential election. There are no electors and no January 6 count in Congress. The state certifies and the winner gets a certificate of election.
Two exceptions: the Texas LEGISLATURE canvasses the governor and lieutenant governor races, and the Texas House Speaker declares the winner. For Congress, the U.S. HOUSE and SENATE each have the final word on their own members' elections.
Gregg 🏴 retweeted
The only thing you’ll find is that election denial is what cost you the election.
We don't need to prove fraud everywhere - only in Texas.
If there were fraud and we can prove the means by which it was done there, the same means may possibly be applied everywhere.
HOW LONG DO WE HAVE?:
How long does anyone have to CHALLENGE the Texas election results? Here's the simple version!
STEP 1: Every county certifies its results within 14 days. This year that deadline was November 17.
STEP 2: The state certifies statewide and congressional races between November 21 and December 7. The GOVERNOR signs off on these.
STEP 3: After that, a losing candidate has 45 DAYS to file a challenge in court. That puts most deadlines in JANUARY.
Recounts are a separate track and much faster - the deadline is just days after a race is certified. ⏱️
And no, this isn't like a presidential election. There are no electors and no January 6 count in Congress. The state certifies and the winner gets a certificate of election.
Two exceptions: the Texas LEGISLATURE canvasses the governor and lieutenant governor races, and the Texas House Speaker declares the winner. For Congress, the U.S. HOUSE and SENATE each have the final word on their own members' elections.
Gregg 🏴 retweeted
This account by @DanNeidle of Russell Brand's use of an injunction to silence (and bankrupt) a woman who accused him of assaulting her is shocking.
She wasn't even allowed to talk about it to the police or to medics other than named individuals.
taxpolicy.org.uk/2026/11/07/…
Gregg 🏴 retweeted
The Metropolitan Police advised Meghan Markle not to go public with child abuse allegations against her father, Thomas Markle Sr., after she received a letter detailing the claims in 2019. She was assured they would be investigated, but the police didn't even pass the information on to other authorities.
Meanwhile, people dragged her for cutting contact with her father, calling her heartless without knowing the facts.