Greg Landers (@GregoryCLanders) profile picture

America First Constitutional Conservative. Not to be confused with pro-war, pro-spending, anti-conservative "MAGA".

Joined July 2024
Photo by Greg Landers (@GregoryCLanders)Photo by Greg Landers (@GregoryCLanders)Photo by Greg Landers (@GregoryCLanders)Photo by Greg Landers (@GregoryCLanders)Photo by Greg Landers (@GregoryCLanders)Photo by Greg Landers (@GregoryCLanders)Photo by Greg Landers (@GregoryCLanders)Photo by Greg Landers (@GregoryCLanders)Photo by Greg Landers (@GregoryCLanders)Photo by Greg Landers (@GregoryCLanders)
The $30 million spent to oust Thomas Massie could have been better spent in Iowa, Texas, South Carolina, North Carolina, Kansas, and Ohio. But thank God Ed Gallrein can rubber stamp Trump’s agenda in a minority, MAGA!
165
417
23
4,573
64,312
I never vote for the left. I'm just not voting. It's a necessary step to send a clear message to the GOP that we are DONE with foreign interventionalism. We also want fiscal conservatism. The national debt needs to go down. The Epstein Class need to be in jail.
1
1
5
49
Greg Landers retweeted
Another daily reminder that Ron Paul was in the Epstein files explicity for NOT being corruptible.
Daily reminder that this man was in the Epstein files explicitly for not being corruptable.
59
588
11
5,107
50,650
Greg Landers retweeted
I heard that Hitler really liked dogs. Do you also like dogs? I guess you're aligned with Hitler. Same logic. The point being Thomas Massie hard disagrees with the uni-party. He will vote against bad policiy presented by both Democrats and republicans. It just happens that Democrats are far worse than Republicans in general. Therefore, Massie has a greater alignment with the GOP then he does with Democrats. That does not mean that the GOP doesn't also have some awful and outright socialist ideas at times. Gotta vote no to that shit, ya dig?
1
7
100
Greg Landers retweeted
Replying to @RealCandaceO
Oopsie daisy Candyland, here is his own words on it, if that helps.
11
12
143
3,400
One of the simplest most straightforward points to examine regarding the Charlie Kirk case controversy. People need to stop being dumb and apply Occam's razor.
Replying to @RealAlexJones
Still dumb…. You really think this is how “they” would get rid of Charlie. Orchestrate a super complex plan involving hundreds of people, carry it out in front of thousands, all with cameras, and then leave the patsy alive. Your brain is FRIED Alex. 🤡
1
107
This is all broken down and explained at cchr.org
I'm kind of surprised that so many people who understand the murderous side effects of the Covid vax cannot accept the possibility of murderous side effects from psych drugs
1
53
@grok what is a wide view fisheye lens? Do security cameras typically utilize these?
2
18
@grok thank you. What do these types of lenses tend to do to the image? Do they affect how things look in the center and around the edges?
1
6
Greg Landers retweeted
I take less than 2 minutes to prove Candace Owens MANIPULATED that photo. If Candace fans cannot understand this, they are either BOTS or RETARDED
173
306
42
2,211
66,819
I understand who may be more popular, but Andrew won the debate on logic and facts, which should be the only criteria.
2
69
The problem with Trump is he is far too liberal and has placated the dissident right into settling for another Clinton/Bush/Obama era, big government, pro war president. All while making us think he was anti-establishment 😂 I wish Trump had run as the Democrat he really is.
47
I like a conspiracy theory as much as the next guy...... But Tyler shot Kirk.. Is it weird yes, should you ask questions, yes. But all evidence points to it being the kid. Anyone watching the trial?
3,860
483
167
17,026
1,510,414
Closet Neocons are coming out, rearing their ugly little heads.
1
3
75
$300 billion is 5 X as much as Congress spends on our roads & bridges annually. I’m tired of winning. The U.S.A. “undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least $300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of” Iran.
2,305
3,631
232
18,595
1,245,270
Support for a politician, president or otherwise, should always be conditional. As soon as they start violating what they campaigned on that gained your support in the first place, all bets are off, and it's skeptical observation going forward.
1
2
35
Serious question. Why remake Cape Fear? The De Niro / Juliette Lewis version still holds up today.
1
99
Greg Landers retweeted
I’ve been a registered Democrat in Los Angeles for more than 40 years. This election, I voted for Spencer Pratt because I’ve watched our city decline over the past two decades. Wanting safer neighborhoods, accountability for criminals, better roads, cleaner schools, lower taxes, less waste and fraud, solutions for homelessness, and cleaner streets shouldn’t be controversial. If caring about those things makes some people label me “MAGA,” then so be it. I still don’t support Trump, I support fixing Los Angeles.
238
251
23
1,616
55,951
Universal mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting/curating, and late counting should not be legal and leaves the door wide open to "legally" rigging elections. Pre-Election Day mail-ins: 🔵 Bass: 38.1% 🔴 Pratt: 27.9% 🔵 Raman: 20% Post-Election Day mail-ins: 🔵 Raman: 37% (+17% surge) 🔵 Bass: 34.9% (-3% drop) 🔴 Pratt: 19% (-9% drop) 3rd place surges to 1st in mail-in ballots arriving after Election Day This defies mathematical probability and the law of averages. It has never happened at this scale in U.S. election history. No one with a functional brain believes this is normal.
6
3
2
21
6,348
Greg Landers retweeted
Spencer Pratt is likely going to be overtaken by far left Nithya Raman today. This graph shows the count on Election Day through last night. Nithya did this by suddenly winning 1st in every new ballot drop. North Korean "elections" have more self respect. Even they’d find it absurd for 3rd to suddenly jump to 1st place in every ballot drop DAYS after an election. It’s just ludicrous.
1,191
3,785
351
17,161
8,159,968