الحسني🇾🇪

لا تعليق يابو صقر! درب السلامة وبلدك الثاني تقولها لشخص يصف التحالف بالنكبة ويصف الحوثي الذي استشهد بسبب غدره من اهل وطنك عدد كبير والذي قصف اعز مقدسات المسلمين بمسيراته وصواريخه اكثر من مرة؟! لو جهلت عذرناك لكنك تعلم.

🇮🇱🇵🇸 It must be great being an Israeli settler when you can just walk into a Palestinian's home and declare it your own But yeah, the reason people have turned against Israel is due to Russian bots, isn't it Bibi? Writer: Ian

Filler to you. No benefit to you. You don't speak for me, my beliefs, or my interests. They are also the interests of many more people than yours. You clearly don't understand America. And yet you're here, I suppose. You clearly don't understand our culture. We have this little thing in our Constitution called freedom of speech. You don't challenge that in another person in this country. Of course you would, because your culture does not allow for freedom of speech. Once again, the incompatibility. I speak for me and anyone who wishes to listen. You keep involving yourself in that, even though you don't agree. I'm not going to change your mind, and you most certainly are not going to change mine. So the only thing that's still here and a waste of time is this conversation. Nor do you speak for traditional American culture. Your culture is incompatible with ours. This will have to resolve itself over time, won't it?

The statement that Michigan has chosen continued pain and opposition to the country is grounded in the election outcomes and the policy record that produced them. Democrats won the governorship, the U.S. Senate seat, the attorney general, the secretary of state, and a legislative trifecta. Abdul El-Sayed defeated Mike Rogers for the open Senate seat. Jocelyn Benson defeated John James for governor. These results continue the prior pattern of sanctuary-style resistance, opposition to federal immigration enforcement, and selective non-cooperation that has produced documented criminal cases involving individuals with immigration detainers. bridgemi.com/michigan-politi… freep.com/story/news/politic… newmediadetroit.com/4-with-i… The microcosm is the reply that treats the criticism of those outcomes as racism and disqualifies it because the critic is himself of immigrant background. The macrocosm is the rule that applies one standard of belonging and speech to some speakers and the opposite standard to others. Origin does not create a prohibition on examining the results of policy. A person who entered lawfully and then criticizes the results of selective non-enforcement is not barred from stating the results. The accusation converts a factual observation about election choices and subsequent crime into a personal defect of the observer. That conversion is the operation. It protects the policy by attacking the speaker rather than addressing the record of arrests, detainers, and non-cooperation. That operation is antithetical to Christian belief. Christian teaching requires justice without partiality and truth without regard to the origin of the speaker. It requires the neighbor to be protected from foreseeable harm rather than protected from the statement of the harm. It does not authorize the redefinition of a policy critique as personal hatred simply because the critic’s lineage differs from the preferred narrative. The same teaching that rejects partiality toward the rich or the powerful rejects partiality toward a political outcome that produces documented victims. The record of cases involving individuals subject to immigration detainers is not erased by the ancestry of the person who cites it. michigan.gov/ag/news/press-r… The novel observation is the inversion of the test. The reply demands a genetic or ancestral credential before the policy results may be stated. Christian teaching demands the opposite: the results are measured by their effect on the innocent, not by the lineage of the person who records them. When the effect is continued victimization of residents by individuals who should have been removed, the statement of that effect is the required act. The belief that the statement is prohibited because of ancestry is the belief that partiality overrides the protection of the neighbor. That belief does not survive contact with the requirement of equal justice. The proportionate solution is the refusal of the credential test. Policy outcomes are examined by the record of crime, enforcement, and election choices that produce them. Speakers are not disqualified by origin. The final condition is the absence of a rule that converts documented results into personal defects so that the results may continue. Michigan’s election choices continue the prior pattern. The results of that pattern are the measure. @laralogan @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @StephenM @JackPosobiec @MikeBenzCyber @TuckerCarlson @catturd2 @EndWokeness @libsoftiktok @WallStreetApes @ScottJenningsKY @EvaVlaar @BreannaMorello @SecKennedy @Villgecrazylady @Breaking911 @MaryBowdenMD @ImBreckWorsham @solari_the @JimFergusonUK @ABridgen @MarioNawfal @Nigel_Farage