1/ Everyone take a deep breath. Texas data centers aren't going anywhere. The Texas governor has very limited authority to stop them. Calls for a pause or moratorium must be approved by TCEQβthe permitting authority of Abbott appointees. Here's how Texas permitting really worksπ
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
Itβs wild to me how stupid some of you are seeing @elonmusk close $40 Billion of debt to buy GPUβs but would rather listen to his words about how cooked some Neoclouds are.
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
CHINAβS SPY GAME JUST HIT A WALL.
The FBI arrested an alleged PRC agent at LAX before she could board a flight to Shanghai.
According to the federal complaint, she surveilled the Taiwanese Presidentβs son and his family β filming their home, vehicles, and reporting information back to PRC handlers.
You donβt get to conduct foreign intelligence operations on American soil and simply hop on a plane home.
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
Guys, it's all fake
The politics
The food
The media
The clothing
The money
It's all fake
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
BREAKING: Mark Zuckerberg says AI development needs to move faster
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
Dario has written that we need to βpace the frontier,β and Sam has agreed. People may be surprised by my response: go ahead.
You guys are the frontier. By any reasonable metric β market share, revenue growth, model capability β the two of you have a duopoly on frontier intelligence. Youβve also claimed the lead is widening because of recursive self-improvement.
I donβt see what you see in the lab. If the unreleased models are scary enough that you think you should slow down, I support your decision to be responsible.
But stop pretending you need anyone elseβs permission. Stop pretending antitrust law has to be suspended so you can form a cartel. Stop pretending you need a regulatory approval process that supersedes product liability. Stop pretending METR is independent when it is intertwined with Anthropicβs investors and staff. Stop pretending you need those same evaluators to police competitors who arenβt even at the frontier.
Most of all, stop pretending the motivation to slow down is purely altruistic. You face massive product-liability exposure if your products enable a truly damaging cyberattack. The market already punishes models that behave in unpredictable or unauthorized ways. After the Hugging Face episode, it is simply good business for OpenAI and Anthropic to trade some raw power for reliability and predictability. Call it alignment if you want. It is also just giving customers what they want.
Pacing the frontier would also create breathing room for a more intelligent conversation about regulation than Bernie Sandersβ βshut it all down.β China is very unlikely to join a global agreement, as you know, and that has to be taken into account as well.
So go ahead and pace the frontier. You are the ones setting it. The easiest way not to build superintelligence is for you to agree not to build it. Demanding your preferred regulatory framework as the price of that will look like blackmail of the public and the political system. So just do it.
If you do, youβll buy goodwill for the next conversation. If you donβt, weβll know this was just another bid for regulatory capture β or an election-season psyop.
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
There's something fishy about all of this
You'd have to be incredibly naive to think these CEOs actually care only about safety
I think Anthropic and OpenAI want to achieve a legal cartel
These two companies are already at the frontier. If the AI race continues under unrestricted competition, there is always the threat of them being surpassed
Altman was already telling the U.S. Senate in 2023 that developing sufficiently advanced models should require licensing
I believe the ultimate goal is to institutionalize what should otherwise be a free market. These companies are already massive. They are both now approaching trillion-dollar valuations
They are in a great position to simply keep monetizing, growing, and establishing themselves as pillars of the future of humanity
If they become deeply embedded in US model licensing and registration frameworks as indispensable advisers to governments, they could help determine evaluation standards, acceptable safeguards, export controls, and what constitutes a dangerous model
There is also a much deeper incentive. These companies have no idea what happens once AGI, or especially ASI, is achieved. They cannot know whether self-improving AI will completely reshape the competitive hierarchy or suddenly make today's technological advantages irrelevant
Becoming part of the authority that controls the frontier would therefore be a way of protecting their own survivorship. Even if the technology changes dramatically, even if another model or company becomes technically superior, they would remain embedded in the institutions deciding who is allowed to develop, deploy, and scale frontier AI
In summary, these companies could go from simply offering models in a competitive market to becoming institutionalized controllers of AI progress
What could the future look like?
A few years from now, there could be perhaps five authorized frontier labs. These labs could control most of the frontier AI market with the help of the state. They would not only have influence over the rules, but could also become deeply entrenched within most major governments
Of course, I can't know for sure what these companies are planning, but sadly, I choose to be cynical
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
A Trump supporter with a trucking company begs Trump to end the war and get gas/diesel prices down because he canβt afford to run his business
(But says he still supports Trump anywayπ€)
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
When looking to understand what has been filed this week by the MMAT Trustee I thought it would be a good idea to look at some Background context. ALL 3 named defendants in the complaint, Citadel , Anson Funds and Virtu, have had some interesting dealings with the SEC, ON THE RECORD and all ONLY in the last 3 years.
Here are some quick highlights and sources:
1. Citadel Securities: the @SECGov issued an administrative order on September 22, 2023. The Commission found that Citadel Securities "willfully violated Rule 200(g) of Regulation SHO," censured the firm, imposed a cease-and-desist order, and levied a $7 million penalty.
- Over FIVE YEARS an estimated MILLIONS of sell orders were mismarked, and the inaccurate data was provided to regulators including the SEC (source: SEC Order 34-98482 sec.gov/files/litigation/adm⦠and press release sec.gov/newsroom/press-relea⦠).
2. Virtu Americas: final consent judgment entered in S.D.N.Y. on December 2, 2025. Virtu Americas is now PERMANENTLY enjoined from violating Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act and paid a $2.5 million penalty, without admitting or denying (source: Reuters reuters.com/legal/governmentβ¦; and Virtu's own 10-Q disclosure sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/β¦).
- Worth knowing the procedural history: the SEC's fraud claims under Securities Act Β§Β§ 17(a)(2) and (3) SURVIVED a motion to dismiss, then Judge Koeltl denied the motion in its entirety from the bench in August 2024, and the SEC then voluntarily dropped them in settlement (source: natlawreview.com/article/secβ¦) .
3. Anson Funds Management and Anson Advisors: SEC order, June 11, 2024. The Commission found Anson Advisors WILFULLY violated Advisers Act Β§ 206(4) and Rule 206(4)-8, and Anson Funds willfully violated Β§Β§ 204 and 206(4) and Rules 204-2(a), 206(4)-7 and 206(4)-8. Censure, cease-and-desist, $2.25 million combined.
- The conduct: coordinating with activist short publishers on the timing of bearish reports, trading around publication, and routing $1.1 million in profit-sharing to a publisher through a third-party intermediary via invoices for research services that were never performed (sources: SEC Order IA-6622 sec.gov/files/litigation/admβ¦ ; SEC summary sec.gov/enforcement-litigatiβ¦).
I think these offer valuable context when reading through the MMAT complaint.
more to follow...
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
Someone said it right Sikhs are good guys till they fight for them , else they become lassi when they ask for justice or accountability
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
A film about slain Sikh activist Jaswant Singh Khalra is being screened across India after its removal from a streaming platform.
Khalra exposed killings and secret cremations by Indian security forces during the Punjab insurgency.
Removed film Satluj spreads across villages in northern India
More on Aljazeera.com
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
JUST IN: π°π· South Korea's KOSPI stock market halted after 8% crash, triggering circuit breaker.
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
Latest $GNS news - Genius Group Cancels 20,000,000 Company Shares, equivalent to 16% of Public Float
Brings This Weekβs Total Reduction in Issued Capital to 26.6 Million Shares, Equivalent to Approximately 22% of Public Float.
SINGAPORE, June 17, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Genius Group Limited (NYSE American: GNS) ("Genius Group", "GNS" or the "Company"), a leading AI-powered education group, today announced that it has returned and cancelled 20,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares in relation to shares issued under the Companyβs Asset Purchase Agreement with Entrepreneur Resorts Ltd (βERLβ).
The amount of shares cancelled is equivalent to 16% of the Companyβs public float.
Todayβs cancellation follows the Companyβs repurchase and cancellation of 6,600,000 Class A Ordinary Shares announced on June 12, 2026.
Taken together, the two actions have reduced the Companyβs issued share capital by 26,600,000 shares this week, equivalent to approximately 22% of the Companyβs public float.
Background: Share Count Exercise and ERL Return
Roger James Hamilton, Founder and CEO of Genius Group, said βThrough the actions taken this week, the Company has reduced its issued share capital by 26.6 million shares while retaining the value of the underlying assets the Company has acquired - namely 100% ownership of Entrepreneur Resorts Ltd."
"By reducing the share count while holding the asset side of the balance sheet, the Company has, on an arithmetic basis, increased its Net Asset Value per Share (NAVPS) for the benefit of all shareholders, and we believe the underlying assets will contribute to the long-term value of Genius Group.β
Continued Focus on NAVPS
Todayβs cancellation forms part of the Companyβs previously announced capital allocation strategy, which is focused on growing NAVPS through:
1 >> the retirement or removal of identified non-trading shares,
2 >> further repurchases under the shareholder-approved buyback mandate,
3 >> growth in the Companyβs net assets through its education businesses and dual-treasury strategy.
As per its announcement on June 15, 2026, the Company has identified an aggregate of up to 43.3 million shares targeted for repurchase, return and/or retirement, representing approximately 36% of the Companyβs public float.
The 26.6 million shares cancelled this week represents 61% of the 43.3 million shares targeted.
While the timing and amount of any further repurchases or cancellations cannot be assured, the Company intends to act diligently and with best efforts to complete the residual capacity under the shareholder-approved buyback mandate prior to its expiry on July 6, 2026.
Full PR - ir.geniusgroup.net/news-evenβ¦
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
You said:
"But the majority of Sikhs would side against the British people if they decided to ban all immigration from India to halt and reverse demographic change".
What you have posted here does not back up your claim.
At all.
You have literally just posted pictures of the British Sikh Report 2025 which tells us that in 2024 40% of Sikhs voted for Labour, which also means the majority of Sikhs DID NOT vote for Labour.
It tells us that voting intentions TODAY would see Labour mustering only 18% of the Sikh vote.
It tells us that 46% of Sikhs are dissatisfied with the current political representation of Sikhs in the UK.
It tells us that 59% of Sikhs support or strongly support a family member or friend joining the UKβs Armed Forces (how terribly anti-British and unpatriotic).
81% of Sikhs believe the history or legacy of Sikhs in the British Armed Forces is very or somewhat important in influencing their opinion on military service (again terribly anti-British and unpatriotic).
The British Sikh Report 2025 was published with Jasvir Singh CBE leading the way.
Jasvir Singh CBE is LABOUR all the way, he was reportedly shortlisted as a Labour candidate for the Tooting parliamentary by-election.
The Sikh Federation UK which you have dug up is a LEFT WING AFFILIATED Sikh advocacy group.
The LEFT WING AFFILIATED Sikh advocacy group you are so keen to make a point with also happen to be the Secretariat of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Sikhs.
The officers of said All Parliamentary Group also happen to be LABOUR with one white CONservative woman by the name of Joy Morrissey.
It is also interesting to know that Gurinder Singh Josan who is the Secretary of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Sikhs also happens to be the former DIRECTOR of HOPE NOT HATE LTD and Chair of Trustees of the HOPE NOT HATE Charitable Trust.
So apart from criticising your infactuation with LEFT WING SIKHS with strong affiliations to the Labour Party and HOPE NOT HATE, do you think a sample size of 1500 Sikhs is a great proportional representation of British Sikhs overall?
Maybe you would like to open your mind to the fact that Sikhs political affiliations are extremely varied and perhaps not as slanted as you are suggesting?
NOTHING in that report supports your claim that:
"But the majority of Sikhs would side against the British people if they decided to ban all immigration from India to halt and reverse demographic change".
You can find all appropriate links here:
britishsikhreport.org/britisβ¦
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jasvirβ¦
sikhfeduk.com/
publications.parliament.uk/pβ¦
find-and-update.company-infoβ¦
Replying to @TRobinsonNewEra
Sure, here's some sources:
Sikhs vote overwhelmingly for left wing parties in Britain. The same is true in the US and Canada.
Even as support has fallen for Labour since 2023, it has increased among Greens and Lib Dems.
Sikh support has been conditional on a Sikh Manifesto pledge. In 2024, it included pledges to criminalise βanti-Sikh hate in a similar fashion to Anti-Semitism and Islamophobiaβ.
It was supported by the Sikh Federation UK β the same one that has released the statements condemning the Nowak family, that people have been praising.
The simultaneous Hindu manifesto, signed by Conservative politicians in 2024, contained commitments to criminalise "microaggressions" as βanti-Hindu hate (Hinduphobia)β, to make it easier for "Religious Workers" and the dependents and elderly parents of Hindus already in the UK to immigrate here, and more funding for Indian language and Hindu schools.
So, the parties have to cater to foreign religions, minority lobbies, and promise liberal immigration policies to win Sikh and Hindu support.
While it may not be the case for your friends, or Hardeep Singh, it is the case that many Sikhs and Hindus in Britain they prioritise whatever advantages their ethnic group over what benefits the British people.
I don't support that. Those who behave that way should leave. And I am happy to ban all immigration from India going forward.
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
π¨ NEW: Sikhs in Southampton say theyβre scared to leave their homes after facing racial abuse over Henry Nowakβs murder
[@thetimes]
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
About 535,000 Sikhs live in the UK (around 0.8% of the population).
The Sikhs aint taking over our towns or cities, or even the UK for that matter you fucking moron.
They integrate and add value, they love, respect and do fight for our country.
Sikhs are not demographically replacing us.
And nobody (including myself) has ever said we want to "give up our homeland to Sikhs" you disingenuous shithouse.
Absolute bellend.
π°π
π
π°π½π³π·π
β¬ πΊπΈπ¦
retweeted
This is very nice to see from the Sikh community.
Other communities would be like βOMG non Sikhs stab people tooβ.
Very adult of them and very admirable.
Respect.
Jas Singh, representing the Sikh Federation (UK) @SikhFedUK speaking at a press conference at Guru Nanak Gurdwara, Smethwick @GNGSmethwick following the sentencing of Vickrum Digwa for 21 years for the murder of Henry Novak.
Β
The Sikh community has unequivocally condemned in the strongest terms Vickrum Digwa for not only the murder of Henry Novak for which he is solely responsible, but also the lies he has told.Β Β
Β
He made the wrong choice, should have pleaded guilty and must now serve his lengthy prison sentence.









































