Nice try idiot. What's misleading or wrong Nothing collapsed. The UK was never a member, so no "coalition" fell apart. The DSRB launched with nine founding backers at the NATO summit in Ankara: Canada, Albania, Belgium, Greece, Latvia, Luxembourg, Romania, Turkey and Ukraine. It's still going ahead. On the same day, Canada's finance minister issued a statement on setting up the bank, with headquarters in Canada and a European hub in Luxembourg. It wasn't a "brutal snub." The two countries issued a joint statement saying they had "mutually concluded" it was best to build "two distinct but complementary institutions," and they agreed on a framework to work together. The two banks have different jobs. The UK's MDM focuses on joint buying and stockpiling of military equipment, while the DSRB lends to the companies and supply chains that make it.gov+1 It's not a sudden reversal. The UK had already kept its distance from the DSRB back in September 2025 (European Parliament Research Service). Starmer's chancellor, Rachel Reeves, had also turned it down. The talks weren't between Carney and Burnham. Burnham has only been PM since July. The decision was led by Chancellor John Healey, the UK's finance minister. In short: it's true that the UK won't join Canada's defence bank. "Collapse" and "isolated" are false. The bank is moving forward with nine founding countries, and the UK agreed to work alongside it. (Your post also misspells "collapse" as "COLLPASE.")