Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
When Putin killed Navalny, Lula said: “A citizen died in prison, I don't know if he was ill or had any issues. To make an accusation is to trivialize. I hope that a coroner will provide an explanation for why the individual died, that's all."
Third Worldist scum.
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
1/ Russian imperialism
2/ Jihad
3/ Jihad
4/ Jihad
5/ Jihad
6/ Jihad
7/ Jihad + natural resource control
8/ Drug cartels
9/ Drug cartels
10/ Jihad
11/ Jihad + natural resource control
12/ Jihadis vs Zionists
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
That the Communist hammer and sickle isn’t commonly regarded as evil and offensive as the Nazi swastika is a failure of education.
“Dear Italian students, who today take to the streets carrying flags with the hammer and sickle and wearing T-shirts emblazoned with ‘CCCP’,” began an open letter in Italian by Lithuanian expat Neringa Budryt.
“I would like to ask you a question: do you truly know what the symbols you carry represent? And do you know what would have happened to many of you had you openly demonstrated in countries living under the oppression of communist regimes?
Let me tell you something. It is easy to display a red flag when, for you, communism is merely an abstract idea of equality, social justice, and rebellion against the system. It is easy to wear a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it when you have never experienced the reality of a communist regime.
We come from that part of Europe where communism was not a T-shirt, a symbol of rebellion, or a romanticized notion of equality. It was the system in which we lived—a system we never chose.
We know the history of Soviet repression, Stalinist purges, the Gulags, and mass deportations. Above all, we know the word "Siberia"—a place to which thousands of innocent people were forcibly deported, simply for thinking differently.
In Siberia—amidst freezing cold, starvation, and forced labor—many lost their lives; those who survived carried the scars of that experience forever. Entire families were torn apart, and generations were denied the chance to live freely in their own homeland.
In the countries of the Soviet bloc, censorship, political police, surveillance, and the suppression of dissent drastically curtailed individual freedoms.
We grew up in a system where state control permeated even our daily lives. At school, we were required to wear the red necktie of the "Pioneers." We were monitored; they tracked where we went and even whether we attended church. Even faith—a choice that should belong to an individual’s own conscience—could become a cause for suspicion.
We used to celebrate Christmas with our windows blacked out, to ensure no one would see us and report us. Because it was forbidden—just like so many other things: jeans, rock music, and all the symbols of a Western lifestyle. My mother returned from a Soviet labor camp. And do you know what happened to her? She was barred from continuing her education because she had been labeled an enemy of communism.
Under a communist regime, you could not protest. You risked arrest, imprisonment, interrogation, persecution—and, in certain historical contexts, even death. In the Soviet Union and other communist regimes, political dissent could cost you your freedom and your life.
Demonstrations independent of the authorities were not a guaranteed right; they were often suppressed by force.
That is why it strikes me to see young Italians proudly displaying the hammer and sickle—symbols associated with regimes that persecuted and imprisoned millions of people.
Today, you are free to take to the streets, shout against the government, criticize institutions, and wave your flags precisely because you live in a democracy that grants you these freedoms. Under an authoritarian regime of that kind, protesting against those in power could have landed you in prison.
This is not about denying the existence of social injustices, inequalities, or the right to fight for a better world. You are free to take to the streets to demand a more just society—but you should not idealize a system that denied so many people the very things you are free to exercise today: the right to choose, to believe, to speak, and to dissent. Before wearing a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it, listen to those who experienced that world. Talk to the deportees and their descendants; read the accounts of those who endured the gulags and forced exile to Siberia. Learn what it meant to be stripped of your freedom, your home, your loved ones—and even any prospect of a normal life—simply because of your background or your beliefs.
Before waving the hammer and sickle, please, study history thoroughly.”
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
👇
CCP-linked nonprofit networks are exploiting U.S. laws to fuel division and anger in America’s public debates. Many are primarily funded by Neville Roy Singham, a U.S. citizen living in China who has funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into U.S. advocacy groups.
Last month, Chairman @RepMoolenaar and @RepJasonSmith sent a letter to @USTreasury, @SecScottBessent, and IRS CEO Frank Bisignano requesting an investigation into these organizations.
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
Churchill could have shortened WW2 by years if he had just “done a deal” with Hitler. George Washington could have done a deal to end the American Revolution. Zelenskyy is in good company.
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
It didn't start on October 7, 2023.
On this day—October 19, 1994
A Hamas suicide bomber boarded the No. 5 bus on Dizengoff Street in central Tel Aviv during the morning rush and detonated 20 kilograms of TNT packed with nails and screws. The blast lifted the bus off its chassis, melted its frame, and scattered body parts into trees and onto rooftops.
Twenty-two civilians were killed and dozens more were wounded, many severely burned or maimed. The dead ranged from young people in their early 20s to elderly passengers in their 70s and 80s. Survivors later described the street as a ribbon of horror, the copper smell of blood in the air, and bodies and fragments strewn across the pavement. It was the deadliest suicide bombing in Israeli history up to that point and the first successful large-scale attack of its kind inside Tel Aviv.
The bomb was built by Yahya Ayyash, known as “the Engineer,” who had been dissatisfied that an earlier attack he planned had killed only six people. The bomber, Saleh Abdel Rahim al-Souwi, had recorded a martyrdom statement the day before. Hamas claimed responsibility and framed the attack as retaliation amid the early Oslo process, just days before Israel and Jordan initialed a peace treaty.
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
I an willing to debate @BarackObama in my home town, Bnei-Brak, which my grandfather purchased in 1924 for hard cash; they still preserve the original trust deed (Kushan) in the town's archives. @AkaLazarus @ShMMor @MikeGinsberg6
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
L’islamo-gauchisme menace la République. La présence massive de drapeaux palestiniens, de slogans communautaires est une réalité terrible dans ces manifestations, tout comme la présence de mouvements proches des frères musulmans.
Aux côtés des black-blocs, ils veulent renverser la République.
Mass immigration has been a catastrophe for Europe. There is no issue more urgent before the continent than to correct this mistake.
Starship, Starlink, Grok, and Roadster. These should all have been Sputnik moments for Europe. Triggered immediate deregulation, mobilization of capital, and ambition to catch up. And that's just the work of Elon's companies alone. But what do we get? A hollowed out EU Inc 💀
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
If only there were any actual American conservative speakers at NatCon…
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
Stop blaming @elonmusk. It is Trump and his administration that cut off intelligence sharing with the Ukrainians that could have been used to save Ukrainian civilians.
Hopefully, Trump will reverse this immoral decision.
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
My own family were tossed out of homes and stripped of nationalities and if anyone suggested I parachute into Alexandria and go on a shooting and kidnapping spree to right the injustice, I would think they were totally fucking mad. The behaviour isnt normal.
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
Many Chinese in America are loyal to China, not America. See below.
Replying to @GordonGChang
In my old job at the other firm, a young Chinese American woman told me to my face that if or when the time came, her loyalty would be with China. She's now an Associate director in their finance department
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
Elon Musk gave Ukraine Starlink within hours of the invasion and saved the front line, while European politicians who built nothing comparable in years now lecture him on how to run his own company.
Sikorski asks the "big man" if Elon is "playing politics with his products again."
The facts are straightforward:
On February 26, 2022 two days after the invasion Ukraine’s Mykhailo Fedorov posted on X asking Elon for Starlink. The same day Musk activated the service. Terminals arrived within days. SpaceX donated thousands (including 3,667 via the USAID partnership) and covered service costs for months while others were still talking. Ukrainian commanders have repeatedly said the front would have collapsed without it.
Elon Musk stated publicly: "No matter how much I disagree with the Ukraine policy, Starlink will never turn off its terminals. We would never do such a thing or use it as a bargaining chip."
Europe has relied for years on American private technology instead of building its own alternatives. It is easy to criticize the man who actually acted when it mattered most.
Elon is not your government official. He builds, risking his own capital. The rest write posts.
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
David Deutsch (@DavidDeutschOxf) and I discuss AGIs and subjectivity on the Joe Walker Podcast (@JosephNWalker):
David Deutsch:
I think it’s inevitable that AGIs will be capable of having internal subjectivity and qualia, because that’s all included in the letter G in the middle of the name of the technology.
Me:
Well, not necessarily, because the G could be general computational power, the ability to solve problems, and there could be no one at all who’s actually human.
David Deutsch:
But there ain’t nothing here but computation. It’s not like in Star Trek: Data lacks the emotion chip, and it has to be plugged in. But there’s nothing possibly in that chip apart from more circuitry like he’s already got.
Me:
But, of course, the episode that you’re referring to is one in which the question arose: Is it moral to reverse engineer Data by dismantling him, therefore stopping the computation? Is that disassembling a machine, or is it snuffing out a consciousness? Because there is an alternative view that subjectivity depends also on whatever biochemical substrate our particular computation runs on. And I think there’s no way of ever knowing.
David Deutsch:
I think we can answer that question before we ever do any experiments, even today, because there’s no difference in principle between a computer that runs partly by electricity and partly by chemicals and one that runs entirely on silicon chips. Because the latter can simulate the former with arbitrary accuracy.
Me:
Well, we don’t have to solve the problem this afternoon in our conversation, but, in fact, I think it is not solvable. But the simulation doesn’t necessarily mean that it has subjectivity. It could just mean it’s a simulation; that is, it’s going through all the motions. It might even do it better than we do, but, you know, there’s no one home. There’s no one actually being hurt.
David Deutsch:
Well, you can be a dualist. You can say that there is mind in addition to all the physical stuff. But if you want to be a physicalist, then there’s this thought experiment where you remove one neuron at a time and replace it with a silicon chip, and you wouldn’t notice.
Me:
Well, that’s the question. An external observer wouldn’t notice. How do we know that, from the point of view of the brain being replaced—every neuron by a chip—it’s like falling asleep? That when it’s done and every last neuron is replaced by a chip, you’re dead, subjectively, even though your body is still making noise?
David Deutsch:
That means that when your subjectivity is—there is something happening in addition to the computation. And that’s dualism.
Me:
I mean, again, I don’t have an opinion one way or another, which is exactly my point. I don’t think it’s a decidable problem. But it could be that that extra something is not ghostly substance. It could be that the stuff that the brain is made of is responsible for that extra ingredient of subjective experience, as opposed to intelligent behavior. I think we’re going to be having the same debate a hundred years from now.
David Deutsch:
Yeah, maybe one of the AGIs will be participating in the debate by then.
Charlie, je suis 🇺🇸 retweeted
Replying to @JakeWSimons
@grok is that Starlink or Starshield. If the latter, does Musk control it or does the Pentagon?





































