Well internet-computer:native is closer to $2 then $3, what a shocker. Always short ICP. Just covered mine.
Let it go to $3 and short again, repeat.
Who is more stupid internet-computer:native Holders? kaspa:native Holders? Or near:native Holders?
67%ICP Holders
11%KAS Holders
22%Near Holders
18 votes • Final resultsThis is exactly how a psyops works, stand next to powerful people. I used to do this also, don't fall for this. internet-computer:native foundation and stakers have unlimited supply, they will just dump on every pump.
I have been right on internet-computer:native and kaspa:native since day one. I said they will only go lower and they have. I predict they will both slowly die off this bull run, while ETH and BTC will go much higher. So far I have been right 100% while fan boys are all wrong.
kaspa:native and internet-computer:native should merge into one giant crypto project!
👑 Together, they could become the undisputed KING OF ALL SHITCOINS! 💩🏆
Two bags, one dumpster fire! 🔥😂
Feels off? Smashing near:native a project doing well for holders while internet-computer:native dumps on users daily and goes down every month. Dom is a great grifter.
This is craazy. I asked one of our PhD engineers to look into NEAR *Confidential* Intents wondering how they designed their system. Unredacted, word-for-word, this was his answer 😱😱😱
"Everything I found out about the privacy claims and confidential intents is so bad that it seems almost comical and I cannot believe what I am seeing. Apparently they run a completely separate instance of the protocol, which is called FAR (as an opposite to NEAR), and that has a permissioned operator set. The entire confidentiality claim seems to rest upon the fact that it is a permissioned chain and the nodes are trusted to keep things private, there doesn't seem to be any deep technology behind it and it also does not seem to be open source. The entities running the nodes are also not publicly known.
I almost feel weird writing this because it is so absurdly bad that it feels like ... I don't know ... a simulation? I know the usual level of overpromising in Web3 but this is so many levels beyond believable that it still feels unreal."
After several posts on internet-computer:native and kaspa:native I can tell you the Kas community is way funnier and engaged. But no one could tell me anything why KAS is good(yes ICP also sucks), the tech is just a DAG Copy and useless. They have no reason to be so confidant.
Finally someone who gets it. kaspa:native is dead and will die a slow death like eos:native and all the other shit coins that do nothing.
$KAS isn’t coming back.
The only thing it’s coming back to is that huge wick fill at all time lows.
Is there a project worse than internet-computer:native, yes!! It's called kaspa:native, it's even more cringe and literally doesn't even work.
JUST IN: Kaspa completes testnet proof of concept for private $KAS transactions
Developer Olaf Weller says TN10 tests confirmed transaction ordering, zero-knowledge proof execution and settlement on Layer 1, though the privacy system remains under development and has not been independently audited.
I feel sorry for everyone in internet-computer:native who falls for this over and over again. The tech is not good, just more hype to make something seem better then it is. While the team dumps on every pump. I told you it's going to fall below $3. Next stop $2.00
Is CK tech from internet-computer:native safe? - Last year the entire canister that held all the BTC was frozen by interpol or someone. So a user sent some stolen or hacked bitcoin:native to the pool and the police froze the whole thing for days. CK is bad tech
@PierreSamaties
No one uses Open Chat? Why you ask? Because people don't want a chat tied to a token or community. They want a chat and that's all. Open chat also needs to market which I have never seen any.
ICP SAVIOR retweeted
The Party Blind Test
Self-described Democrats agree with a list of policy ideas, then find out whose they are.
Just Try It, California!
internet-computer:native making ckSOL that no one will use. CK tech has no adoption and more complicated then a bridge. Bridges take 3-5 seconds, ck takes extra steps and less safe. It's old tech. No one is going to use this for solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112
The Internet Computer now speaks Solana.
ICP apps can read from and write to @solana directly.
And with ckSOL, backed 1:1 by SOL, DeFi apps like @LiquidiumFi, MULTI/DEX and @ICPSwap can integrate SOL natively, next to BTC, ETH and ICP.
No bridge required.
someone tell him internet-computer:native is s low rug
Can someone explain me like I'm 9 years old why the $ICP chart looks like a rug-pulled memecoin?
This is what someone who never grew up in LA would say. She spends most her time in her home state of NJ many people are saying now. Clown show continues. @nithyavraman



















