Here are the protocols with price -2% or more over the past 30 days AND revenue +10% or more over the past 30 days AND $200K or more monthly revenue
To make it fun I filtered by the top #3 that meet these criteria but are the most overpriced
1. $ENA on a fully diluted basis has a whopping 178x FDV P/S
but +84% in 30d, powered by sUSDe yield demand and funding rates
2. $VIRTUAL the true cost at full dilution is 117.9× revenue
$486K monthly revenue with an mcap of $435M
3. $APEX the fully-diluted P/S jumps to 55.5× with a 30 day revenue of $209K and a marketcap of $38M
These are price resilient with strong fundamentals in this brutal market, but they do remain overpriced
Run this prompt in @DefiLlama's AI to surface tokens where fundamentals are improving:
"Find protocols with price -2% or more over the past 30 days AND revenue +10% or more over the past 30 days AND $200K or more monthly revenue"
The best pumps usually start before the chart looks obvious
I deep researched underpriced tokens where fundamentals are currently moving faster than price
One is at 1% of its ATH 🤯
My criteria was extremely strict:
- At least some value passed to holders
- Revenue + fees accelerating
- Relatively low FDV / Revenue
- Price is below 50% of its ATH
- Vol + TVL growing, etc
Only 5 tokens made the cut
1. solana:ChVzxWRmrTeSgwd3Ui3UumcN8KX7VK3WaD4KGeSKpypj is my #1 pick
A +1,363% 30d revenue with recent V2 launch and rebuilding narrative
It sitting at 0.9% of its ATH ($23.38 → $0.21 today)
If the revenue trend holds, the re-pricing gap is enormous
What I do NOT like is that most revenue doesn't flow to token holders
2. ethereum:0x808507121b80c02388fad14726482e061b8da827
Cleanest fundamental picture of the 5
It's the only protocol here with TVL inflows (+14% 30d) $326K revenue in a single week with $10.2M
Annualised holder revenue means token holders are being paid real yield
It's trading at 25% of its $7.50 ATH with growing TVL is a credible asymmetric setup
But whilst its 7D revenue is up 75%, it's worth noting that its 30D rev is down 35%
3. $Spark (MakerDAO)
Get this - $5.28B TVL backing a $71M mcap 👀
One of the most extreme TVL-to-mcap ratios
What I am watching is the 330% 7d revenue spike which looks like a recovery bounce off a deeply depressed 30d
is that bounce structural (new borrow demand) or a one-week blip?
4. $Met (Metronome)
FDV/revenue of 0.94×
the protocol is trading below 1× annual revenue
That's almost unheard of for a live protocol generating $200K+/week
BUT TVL is declining (-5% 30d) and it's a micro-cap ($6.6M mcap), so liquidity risk is real
5. $QUICK (QuickSwap)
1.18× FDV/revenue with 145% 7d momentum is compelling
but TVL is bleeding (-11.8% 30d), which contradicts the revenue growth signal
Worth monitoring, but TVL outflows are a yellow flag
Most DeFi tokens look cheap until you check performance
So I searched for tokens trading under 20x FDV/revenue on both 1Y and annualized numbers.
49 made the cut. 34 pass value back to holders
I filtered down to find one that are undervalued, revenue-generating, and still growing
The 3 that stood out:
1. $ORE: trades at 1.88x 1Y revenue and 1.57x annualized revenue
Not just cheap but the current revenue run-rate is stronger than the trailing year
With ~99% of value flowing through its mining model, it was the cleanest cheap growth setup in the screen
2. $pump: this one is surprising. It trades at only 3.31x 1Y revenue and 3.74x annualized revenue
It is the strongest revenue engine here, doing $464M in trailing revenue
The key is that 50% of net revenue is locked into buybacks and burns
This however is cyclical and relies on Sol meme activity comes back, the token has a very direct value-accrual loop
3. $SKY: trades at 6.61x 1Y revenue and 9.05x annualized revenue
The revenue base is large, but buybacks are currently throttled while Sky builds its solvency reserve
With 42.5% of value flowing to holders, the upside case is buybacks scaling back up once that overhang clears
Where has Llama AI been all my life
Here is my prompt
defillama.com/ai/chat/shared…
Trump Media transferred around $200M of bitcoin:native to an exchange (likely dump?)
They are currently sitting on a total of $455 million in unrealized losses 🤯
But it's not as bad as it looks on the surface. Here's what I find fascinating:
They raised ~$2.5 billion in May 2025 from ~50 institutional investors
They sold ~$1.5 billion in common stock and $1 billion in 0% convertible senior secured notes due 2028
The money was raised specifically to buy Bitcoin and build one of the largest corporate Bitcoin treasuries among public companies
As of Q1 2026 (March 31, 2026), 4,261 BTC were pledged as collateral to secure the $1 billion convertible notes
They reported a positive operating cash flow of $17.9 million in Q1 (fourth straight quarter of green)
The surface level read is “they’re dumping.”
But this could be a sale, collateral movement, or them managing the debt they used to fund the BTC buy
Trump Media Transfers 2,650 BTC in Second Major Move of 2026
According to Lookonchain, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) transferred 2,650 BTC worth about $205 million to Crypto com, marking its second major Bitcoin move this year. TMTG originally accumulated 11,542 BTC at an average price of about $118,522 per BTC, and its remaining holdings are estimated at around 6,889 BTC, currently sitting on an unrealized loss of roughly $455 million. xitter.cf/lookonchain/status/205…
South Korea’s 7th-largest funeral firm, Parents’ Love, invested $40M into a 2x leveraged ETF tracking Ethereum DAT company $BMNR
They are down ~$33M 🥲
But here’s what's disturbing:
> They pulled the entire investment straight from customer prepaid funeral deposits instead of its own operating cash
Directly risking money meant for future burials
I wonder where we've seen that 🤔
> They only made about $4.1 million in 2025 revenue. This shows how badly the bet hurt the firm.
> this seems to be common practice. 43% of South Korea's 75 prepaid funeral firms now have assets worth less than the customer prepayments they owe
This raises real doubts about their ability to deliver services
> These firms fall under light Fair Trade Commission rules as simple installment businesses, with no capital requirements, investment limits, or financial regulator checks
> The daily-reset 2x leveraged ETF triggered extra losses through volatility decay on top of the Ethereum stock's decline
> our dudes, the funeral company, call the $33 million loss short-term and manageable within its buffers
But refund requests from worried customers are rising across the sector
ICYMI: SOUTH KOREA’S 7TH-LARGEST FUNERAL FIRM “PARENTS’ LOVE” INVESTED 59.5B WON ($39.7M) IN A 2X LEVERAGED ETF TRACKING ETHEREUM DAT COMPANY $BMNR - VALUE CRASHED TO 10.2B WON ($6.8M) - PER HANKYUNG
SOURCE: hankyung.com/article/2026051…
The new 13F is even crazier than we thought
Disclosed exposure jumped from $5.5B to roughly $13.7B
But here's the part people are missing:
He opened massive positions across the entire AI chip stack
But at the same time, last quarter he held a $747M bullish Intel call
This quarter, $INTC is a put
He also cut his CoreWeave call from $774M down to $141M
So this is not just “long AI”. It looks more precise
More cautious on the chip names where valuation, supply ramps, and competition are now obvious risks
He kept the Bitcoin miners turning into AI infrastructure plays, but added Hive Digital
The thesis is still the same:
AGI needs compute
Compute needs data centers
Data centers need electricity
And the real bottleneck is still electrons, not chips
Today Leopold’s 13F drops, and we get to look at his latest disclosed trades
He turned $225M into $5.5B+
24x in 12 months
But here's what no one actually mentions:
- His fund holds activist stakes in Bitcoin miners
This gives him direct meetings and contract visibility with hyperscalers (Google, Microsoft, etc) on massive AI power deals
So he likely sees real-time AI infrastructure demand that normal investors never see
- Also, A 13F only shows the public long book
No shorts, no full AUM, no leverage, no private deals, and limited visibility into options or derivatives
But his "Situational Awareness" manifesto is playing out exactly as predicted.
His core thesis will likely remain unchanged: AGI/data centers bottlenecked by electricity ("electrons not chips")
My guilty pleasure is binge watching @Pred_History takes
TLDR: China isn’t America’s rival. It’s America’s hallucination
Whether or not you agree with his views, you have to respect his ability to turn geopolitics into a theory of consciousness itself
Trump’s China visit is just the surface event
The real argument is stranger...America built the dollar dream, China became its second layer, and now both powers have to renegotiate the illusion before it collapses
I picked the best parts, but it is 100% worth watching the whole video
youtube.com/watch?v=BIl5vJn6…
Imagine a single open source tool that turns your prompts into images, videos, talking portraits, and cinematic shots
for a fraction of what Higgsfield charges
And here's something nobody talks about
It can produce uncensored outputs for total creative control 👿
All you need to do, is plugin your API keys
4.5K GitHub stars, 821 forks 🤯
Here's the repo
github.com/anil-matcha/open-…
A benchmark framework that beat all other models in real time trading @Polymarket
Best part is that it's based on an open source LLM (called MiMo)
Interesting reasons for its outperformance that the paper points to, are:
1. high confidence bets needed news support. Wrong overconfident bets were punished 😬
2. It doesn’t just read the market odds, it also processes news, order-book snapshots, and other real world signals
3. models were pushed to skip weak bets and act only when their view strongly beat market odds
4. It can analyse multiple markets at once, comparing strategies and confidence across them to avoid mistakes and maximize gains
Really interesting read 👇
The browser game market is expected to quietly hit $9 billion by 2030
And popular web game developers reportedly earn anywhere between $ 50K and $ 1M per year
But a good web game can take around 6 months to build
Even an MVP can cost $ 150 K
Now you can one-shot a web game from end to end with just an AI prompt, for free
That's what @YueXiangyu and his colleagues have built
An open-source AI GitHub project called OpenGame
It can generate a complete playable web game from a single prompt not just code snippets
You do not need to tinker with assets, images or references to get the game working end to end
This is the beginning of anyone being able to create the games they always wanted to play
Github: github.com/leigest519/OpenGa… Demo: opengame-project-page.com/#d…
Paper: huggingface.co/papers/2604.1…
This is a @HyperliquidX trader that should be added to your watchlist
Not a "whale" and doesn't trade with big margins
Well calculated with an impressive total profit of $445,000 in one week
What got my attention is an impressive $371,000 that he made on a perfectly time $ZEC play
He JUST closed all his positions





















