Our mission is to create, tokenize, and manage green initiatives, driving impact and innovation for the green energy transition.
Lugano, Switzerland
Joined November 2024
- Tweets870
- Following48
- Followers103
- Likes1.1K
Taket gav mer el än vad pizzerian gjorde av med just då – ugnarna var avstängda. På Casa Latina i Skutskär fick andelsägarna sin del av intäkterna varje månad maj–september 2026. Pelle visar läget i filmen. intellishares.io/projects/ca…
1
24
Måste du äga ett tak för att ha solceller? Nej, verkligen inte. Panelerna gör ofta mer nytta där verksamheten gör av med mer el än i en villa. Pelle förklarar varför taket inte behöver vara ditt. intellishares.io/projects/ca…
18
Hyresgästen vill inte betala för solpaneler på någon annans tak. Fastighetsägaren betalar inte elen. Båda gör rätt för sig – och taket förblir tomt. Pelle förklarar knuten som låser taken. intellishares.io/projects/ca…
14
Där andra ser ett tomt tak ser Pelle en tom möjlighet. Huset under drar el hela dagen medan taket står tomt. På Casa Latina i Skutskär köper restaurangen el från taket vi satte upp – och vem som helst kan köpa en andel. intellishares.io/projects/ca…
29
Blir det någon solel en grå regnig dag? På Casa Latina täckte panelerna ändå nästan hälften av restaurangens el just då. intellishares.io/projects/ca…
33
Solpanelerna på Casa Latina monterades av teamet bakom IntelliShares. Anläggningen är uppdelad i andelar. Fler kan äga en del. intellishares.io/projects/ca…
18
Varför sitter det inte solpaneler på alla tak? Tekniken och pengarna finns, säger Paul. Det som saknas är kunskap. #solenergi intellishares.io/projects/ca…
14
Mycket egen elanvändning och ett bra tak. Det är vad som behövs för att solel ska löna sig, säger Paul. Casa Latina i Skutskär har båda. intellishares.io/projects/ca…
50
Casa Latina i Skutskär, senaste 30 dagarna:
drygt 850 kWh från taket
2 405 kWh in från nätet
Taket täckte ungefär en fjärdedel av pizzerians el. Nätet bär resten.
På bilden: växelriktaren, större än taket behöver. Vi ägde den redan.
intellishares.io/projects/ca…
39
The roof on the pizzeria in Skutskär made 1,005 kWh last month. The building used 3,427.
Under a third of the load. That is what a commercial rooftop is for: it replaces power you would otherwise buy at retail.
3,152 kWh since May.
intellishares.io/projects/ca…
1
39
The roof in Skutskär paid out for the first time. That is one of three things in Letter #3.
Just over EUR 162 from July, EUR 35 of it to the people who bought shares.
Small numbers. One pizzeria roof, in July. We would rather say so.
intellishares.io/newsletter?…
1
1
79
Letter #2 is out. Casa Latina's first month: ~1,072 kWh and its first invoice sent, plus 250 people powered by a battery and a Tesla. The honest version, and the sign-up, here → intellishares.io/newsletter/…
1
2
63
In April this was just a roof we were bolting panels onto. Now Casa Latina's first invoice has gone out: 980 kr for May. It's our proof of concept: a small pizzeria rooftop, built to test the whole model. And it works. You can own a slice: intellishares.io/projects/ca…
A few weeks ago we ran the power for the University of Gävle's STEM and AI Day — 250 people in one hall. We'd planned for about 11 kilowatts (kW); with the crowd and ventilation it climbed to ~44 kW. The whole room ran off-grid on rooftop solar and Pelle's Tesla.
32
32
306
We're back. After a short rebrand, IntelliShares is live again, same team and the same projects. We turn real, producing green infrastructure into tokenized real-world assets (RWA) you can own a slice of. intellishares.io.
Infrastructure risk: weather, equipment, energy contracts.
Crypto risk: narratives, sentiment, depegs.
One you can model with decades of data.
The other changes with a tweet.
Know what you own.
Utility-scale solar farms get funded.
Banks understand them.
Ticket sizes justify the due diligence.
Commercial rooftops sit in a dead zone:
→ Too large for residential financing
→ Too small for institutional infrastructure funds
→ Due diligence costs exceed what the project can absorb
But rooftops have advantages farms don't:
→ Energy consumed on-site - minimal transmission loss
→ No farmland conversion - zero land-use conflict
→ Faster to deploy - weeks, not years
The projects are good. The financing model is broken.
3
7
95
INT = how you pay.
RWA token = what you own.
One moves capital.
The other represents infrastructure.
That's it.
That's the model.
Most green energy investment flows to countries that already have clean grids.
Sweden: ~7 g CO₂/kWh. Abundant capital. Low-carbon already.
Bulgaria: ~450 g CO₂/kWh. Needs investment. Hard to access.
Same dollar. Dramatically different climate impact depending on where it's deployed.
But cross-border infrastructure investment adds cost and complexity - intermediaries, currency risk, unfamiliar legal systems.
Result: capital stays comfortable. High-impact markets stay underserved.
Fixing this mismatch is a financing problem, not an energy problem
