IntersectCIVICS retweeted
Dijkstra is the first Cardano hard fork that needs a constitutional change as
well as a technical one.
Without it, the new protocol parameters would be frozen at their launch
values.
CAP-12 adds them to the Constitution, with guardrails. Open for review now.
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
I noticed the sentiment around Cardano Whale. I miss him too.
I'm glad that delegators noticed his retirement and delegated to other DReps. However, there are still 274 ADA holders delegating about ₳6.8M to him.
A lot of small active DReps would appreciate the support.
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
I've run a Cardano stake pool for six years. Here is what the minimum pool fee actually does. Every figure below came off my own db-sync node tonight. None of it is quoted from anyone's proposal.
minPoolCost is a flat 170 ADA taken off a pool's rewards before delegators see anything.
Mean gross reward per block, epochs 641-650: 298.11 ADA.
Same fee, same epoch, different pool:
1 block → 57.0%
2 blocks → 28.5%
5 blocks → 11.4%
20 blocks → 2.9%
A twentyfold spread. That is not a fee. It is a charge that falls hardest on whoever earns least.
And one block per epoch is the good case. It takes ~1,010,400 ADA of stake to expect a block. The median pool sitting on the 170 floor holds 762,550. The typical affected pool expects fewer than one block per epoch. In those epochs it earns nothing, and neither do its delegators.
Be precise about who this hits. 504 active pools declare exactly 170 ADA: 18.8% of pools, 22.6% of stake. Among pools that actually mint blocks, 361 of 1,217. It is not every pool. It is the floor under every pool, and it is what a small operator is forbidden to go below.
That floor has not moved in 207 epochs. Two years and ten months. Set at 340 at Shelley launch in 2020, halved once in October 2023, nothing since.
Pools minting at least one block, over three years: 1,147 → 939. Down 18.1%.
There is an action on chain right now to cut it to 75 ADA. That would take the one-block share from 57.0% to 25.2%.
DReps: 63.59% yes, needs 67%. Short by 170 million ADA.
SPOs: 14-26% yes, needs 51%. Short by 2.7 to 7.6 billion.
The DRep gap is closable in three days. The SPO gap is not, because 17.3 billion ADA of pool stake has not voted at all. Among SPOs who did vote, yes leads 2.92bn to 0.49bn. Six to one in favour.
Sit with that. Nobody rejected this. 85% of voting SPOs backed it. 93% of voting DReps backed it. It dies because the stake that decides it never turned up, and on Cardano a non-vote is counted exactly like a no.
The Constitutional Committee has not reached its quorum either. Same silence, third chamber.
So ask who the status quo serves. Not the 504 pools on the floor. Not the 208 operators who stopped producing blocks. It serves whoever benefits from the fee staying exactly where it is, and they need do nothing at all to get it. They just have to not vote.
Deadline is the epoch boundary at 1 September, 21:45:10 UTC. Not later. There is no extra epoch.
SPOs: if you have never set up governance keys, do it now. If you truly have no view, ABSTAIN. An abstention leaves the denominator. Silence does not.
Every number here is reproducible from a public node. Queries, raw output and the full findings, including three results that cut against my own argument:
server-tools.grahamsnumberpl…
Check them. That is rather the point.
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
72 HOURS TO VOTE ⏳
The Update Constitutional Committee 2026 action will expire on September 1 at 21:44:51 UTC.
Current voting progress:
🗳️ DReps: 66.07% / 67%
🗳️ SPOs: 37.58% / 51%
(The Constitutional Committee doesn't vote on this action).
When the action expires, four existing Committee members’ terms will also end. If the Committee is not updated, it will fall to three active members - below the required committeeMinSize of five.
Until the Committee returns to at least five members, Treasury Withdrawal, Parameter Update, Constitution Update and Hard Fork Initiation actions cannot be ratified. This could also affect the Dijkstra/Leios roadmap, which will require constitutional as well as technical updates.
Increased SPO participation is particularly urgent. Please review the proposal and cast your Yes, No or Abstain vote before the deadline. Whichever way you assess the action, please don’t leave your voting power silent.
Read the proposal and vote:
gov.tools/connected/governan…
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
This week in the Intersect Update:
⏳ Final call for two on-chain votes for SPOs and DReps
🗳️ Board election applications open Aug 31
🛠️ Dijkstra progress
Keep up to date with Intersect Weekly Update #126 👇
intersectmbo.org/news/inters…
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
Set reminders: xitter.cf/i/spaces/1qKVmygmmEVxB…
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
DRep Monthly Call #3
Join DReps and community members for a discussion on governance actions, upcoming votes, treasury and budgets, governance tooling and ecosystem developments.
📅 Last Wednesday of every month
🕒 3pm UTC
Sign up : luma.com/vwo6axek
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
Dear SPOs,
You absolutely shredded the voting participation party, and by far outnumbered the DReps, on the last ParamChange in February, but this time... its looking a bit dire.
I know for most of you its summer and all, but with less than 2 weeks left to go, PLEASE do not sleep on voting on these two GovActions:
1. Parameter Change (cexplorer.io/gov/action/ab47…)
2. CC update (adastat.net/governances/729d…)
_________________
If you do not want to vote on all these GovActions (you never signed up for that job after all..), then you can auto-abstain on everything except hardforks:
xitter.cf/alxaex/status/20291693…
btw... Should you then actively want to vote on smth you care about, you can still over-write your auto-abstain with a dedicated vote, np. :)
Call to all SPOs, who want to remove themselves from voting on all Governance Actions (Except Hardforks) by AUTO-ABSTAINING, with a little known and badly documented trick:
When you delegate your pool's reward address to auto-abstain (via a DRep certificate), it carries over to the whole pool's rights to vote.
github.com/cardano-foundatio…
Why are hardforks an exception?
Because voting on HF GAs is, atm, the best true signalling method for SPO readiness we have. Without such signalling, enacting a hardfork would potentially split the network uncontrollably.
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
Constitutional Amendment Portal (CAP) update 🧢
It has been encouraging to see early engagement with the portal.
So far the community has submitted:
3 Constitutional Amendment Proposals (CAP)
1 Constitutional Issue Statement (CIS)
Connect a wallet. Join the disucssions. 👇️
cap.intersectmbo.org
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
The portal is in alpha, and community testing is part of building it.
Connect any CIP-30-compatible Cardano wallet, explore the Constitution, try the proposal process and tell us what works, or what doesn’t.
Your feedback will directly help shape what comes next.
🔗 cap.intersectmbo.org
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
Everyone has an opinion about Intersect. So we wanted you to hear ours.
Understand the work, then decide for yourself.
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
Message to DReps: yes, its a call for votes! 🙃
On Ekklesia now - Your votes are needed to identify the 4 candidates you’d most like to see progress to the upcoming Constitutional Committee governance action.
intersect.ekklesia.vote/
Consider: each candidate’s understanding of the Constitution, ability to assess actions impartially against it, and their readiness to fulfil the responsibilities of the role.
Ask questions. Review candidates, and Cast your votes - you have FOUR so USE THEM
Thank you 🫡
Constitutional Committee elections 2026, facilitated by Intersect 🗳️
DRep voting for the 4 CC member seats up for renewal in epoch 653 is underway on the Hydra Voting platform.
So far 13 DReps, representing 601.2M ada voting power, have voted across the 10 available candidates. Participation is essential to ensure legitimacy of the candidates that will ultimately be included in the Update Committee governance action on-chain.
Vote close: July 23, 2026 at 21:45 UTC
Vote here:
intersect.ekklesia.vote/ball…
Ada holders and DReps can also ask candidates questions. We equally encourage candidates to respond to questions on the platform at:
hydra-voting.intersectmbo.or…
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
The hard fork governance action was ratified at the last epoch boundary, on the Preview testnet.
This now means that it will be enacted at May 8, 2026 at 0000 UTC.
🚨 SPOs, DApps and developers - You MUST upgrade to cardano-node-11.0.1 and db-sync-13.7.0.5 in order to safely cross the fork!
preview.gov.tools/governance…
The Cardano Preview testnet is currently poised to ratify the hard fork governance action at the next epoch boundary.
On Preview, epochs are one day, in contrast to five days on PreProd and Mainnet. This means that if the HF GA is ratified in ~2hrs time, it will be enacted in ~26hrs time (May 8, 2026 at 0000 UTC).
SPOs, DApps and developers are highly encouraged to continue upgrading ahead of the hard fork initiation for a smooth transition and to begin testing out the new features enabled by the upgrade as soon as they are available.
preview.gov.tools/governance…
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
Is Cardano governance failing?
I don't think so, but that's my subjective interpretation.
Now you can make up your own mind by looking at the data that's based on the report @IntersectCIVICS shipped!
Check out the new Cardano Governance Health Dashboard on Dune to find out.
Replying to @IntersectMBO @Dune
We've also created an initial Cardano Governance Health Dashboard 🏛️ 🏥
🔗 buff.ly/xpcjTr6
Built from the @IntersectCIVICS Governance Health Working Group's KPI report 📋️
🔗 buff.ly/JHo72W4
Governance transparency, powered by on-chain data. 🔎 📊
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
Thought of the day…
So many of the people shaping the ecosystem are community members who decided to get involved.
Intersect Committee applications will open March 30 and need people who like to
• read things carefully
• challenge ideas constructively
• help the ecosystem make better decisions
Could that be you? 👀
More info:
intersectmbo.org/news/upcomi…
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
CGOV now has multi-language support. No need to copy paste proposals in translators anymore.
You can now read proposals & rationales in:
- Chinese
- English
- French
- German
- Japanese
- Portuguese
- Spanish
IntersectCIVICS retweeted
I just published Building Our Knowledge Base: Contribute to the Cardano Governance Educational Repository medium.com/p/building-our-kn…

























