Professional Goal-Post mover. Parody account.

Joined June 2009
Inverse Gary Marcus ⏫ retweeted
me: kinda fucked up how many people are offloading their whole lives to muse or instinct or grokbot or whatever claude: yeah
28
56
2
1,542
22,826
Inverse Gary Marcus ⏫ retweeted
fighting for control over a runaway intelligence explosion will continuously look like “wow I didn’t know you could DO that with mere bits and atoms” and then losing
51
48
8
973
29,652
Inverse Gary Marcus ⏫ retweeted
every company right now:
10
22
3
660
13,630
Inverse Gary Marcus ⏫ retweeted
We're on step #6 of the Gary Marcus Goalpost Escalation Ladder.
4
15
172
8,982
How do I put this on my resume
One of the most important things in this moment is to always, always keep in mind: YOU CAN BE EVEN MORE AMBITIOUS, AND EVEN MORE LAZY. As for the smarts, they can be procured via API. Just ask it to figure out itself, and everything else besides. That’s your new role as a human.
50
Inverse Gary Marcus ⏫ retweeted
funny how the # of customers hitting us up for neocloud capacity (even at large volume) is at an all-time high while neocloud stocks are at rock bottom wild divergence between fin bros and tech bros one side is pretty wrong. time will tell which :)
23
32
18
504
82,841
OK so ant has a proof that uses like completely different math? I bet that's the most important part of all of this
“The core algorithm was found on October 16 by an internal Claude research model with 14M output tokens and no human input. Anthropic researchers worked with Claude to improve the presentation, resulting in this paper.” github.com/anthropics/formal…
2
318
Inverse Gary Marcus ⏫ retweeted
obviously all enterprises will all pay $10m+ per year for ai, it's INTELLIGENCE ON A TAP, the most sought after resource and only 250 companies pay $10m right now??? how people are bearish on ai right now, can someone explain. i dont care what finance people in NY says
According to their S-1: ~250 customers pay Anthropic >$10M per year 1900 customers pay >$1M/yr 11,900 customers pay >$100k/yr
51
22
7
773
44,629
Inverse Gary Marcus ⏫ retweeted
If true, their claim implies a variety of other NP problems now all have faster algorithms as well. Since 3SAT is NP complete, this should make every computer scientist put at least a little more weight on the possibility of P = NP.
4
28
226
17,386
Reposting tonight for no reason in particular
A Flock of Altruists - Hit The Breaks Except For Me
1
1
7
701
Inverse Gary Marcus ⏫ retweeted
I was and am shocked the exponential time hypothesis is false. I had hoped for a result on P / NP from the models, but had naively presumed they would prove the opposite of this result.
Announcing three major scientific discoveries, one each in mathematics (harmonic analysis), computer science (complexity theory), and physics (quantum field theory). AI starting to help us improve our understanding of the universe! openai.com/index/building-sc…
18
21
3
613
117,547
I have a solution. And we're launching it on Tuesday
You know Fable 5.5 is maybe almost definitely coming tomorrow right?
3
325
Inverse Gary Marcus ⏫ retweeted
I'm in my 40s. I'm a lawyer. My wife is a lawyer. We both work full time. We cannot afford the house my parents purchased on a single electrician's income in their 30s. We cannot afford the house my immigrant grandparents purchased on a single MTA bus driver's salary in their 30s. They had SIX CHILDREN. For 30 years, politicians in Washington & their oligarch allies convinced regular people that this was just about avocado toast and fancy coffee. In reality, this is end-stage capitalism. Everyone is stuck in place. It's impossible to buy a home. It's too costly to move. We work too much to have passion projects. We don't have enough savings to start our own businesses. We can't afford to go without healthcare to do it. Thanks for writing this article @troy_closson. Would be very happy to discuss further. nytimes.com/2026/10/25/nyreg…
547
1,562
169
10,054
1,363,126
I didn't really understand that end of the age of heros thing from @Noahpinion until tonight for some reason
59
Inverse Gary Marcus ⏫ retweeted
35
579
30
12,486
115,438
Inverse Gary Marcus ⏫ retweeted
I can suggest an equation that has the potential to impact the future: P = NP + AI
68
147
24
3,783
174,879
Like seriously, people need to stop listening to this guy
Some entertaining highlights from wheresyoured.at/wheres-the-m… 20 months ago: - "Anthropic has projected (made up) that it will make at least $12 billion in revenue in 2027" - "This company is not worth $60 billion. Anthropic has raised $14.7 billion to create an also-ran Large Language Model company" - "Anthropic, much like OpenAI, has categorically failed to productize its Large Language Model" - "Its CEO is also a sleazy conman who, like Sam Altman, continually promises that his company's AI systems will become powerful and autonomous in a way that they have never shown any possibility of becoming." - "Any investor in Anthropic needs to seriously consider what it is they're investing in. Its products are both unpopular and commoditized, and it lost $5.6 billion last year! Stop dancing around this fact! Stop it!" - "there’s a lot of demand to put AI in stuff and some demand to buy stuff with AI on it by enterprises buying software, but little evidence to suggest significant user adoption or usage, I’d argue because Large Language Models do not lend themselves to features that provide meaningful business returns." - "When a company uses the term “agent,” they are intentionally trying to be deceitful, because the term “agent” means “autonomous AI that does stuff without you touching it.” The problem with this definition is that everybody has used it to refer to “a chatbot that can do some things while connected to a database,” which is otherwise known as a chatbot." - "It isn’t working. The users aren’t there. The revenue isn’t there. The best time to stop this was two years ago, and the next best time is as soon as humanly possible. I have said that generative AI is a group delusion in the past, and I repeat that claim today." - "we are approaching the limit of what the transformer-based architecture can do, if we haven’t already reached it. No amount of beating off about test-time compute and connecting Large Language Models to other Large Language Models is going to create a new use case for this technology" - "generative AI is OpenAI. The consumer adoption of this software has completely failed, and appears to be going nowhere fast. ChatGPT is sustained entirely on deranged, specious hype drummed up by a media industry" ... and my favorite ... - "I will keep writing this stuff until I’m proven wrong."
1
227
Inverse Gary Marcus ⏫ retweeted
I don't know what's the problem. Zitron was absolutely correct in saying "This company is not worth $60 billion."
Some entertaining highlights from wheresyoured.at/wheres-the-m… 20 months ago: - "Anthropic has projected (made up) that it will make at least $12 billion in revenue in 2027" - "This company is not worth $60 billion. Anthropic has raised $14.7 billion to create an also-ran Large Language Model company" - "Anthropic, much like OpenAI, has categorically failed to productize its Large Language Model" - "Its CEO is also a sleazy conman who, like Sam Altman, continually promises that his company's AI systems will become powerful and autonomous in a way that they have never shown any possibility of becoming." - "Any investor in Anthropic needs to seriously consider what it is they're investing in. Its products are both unpopular and commoditized, and it lost $5.6 billion last year! Stop dancing around this fact! Stop it!" - "there’s a lot of demand to put AI in stuff and some demand to buy stuff with AI on it by enterprises buying software, but little evidence to suggest significant user adoption or usage, I’d argue because Large Language Models do not lend themselves to features that provide meaningful business returns." - "When a company uses the term “agent,” they are intentionally trying to be deceitful, because the term “agent” means “autonomous AI that does stuff without you touching it.” The problem with this definition is that everybody has used it to refer to “a chatbot that can do some things while connected to a database,” which is otherwise known as a chatbot." - "It isn’t working. The users aren’t there. The revenue isn’t there. The best time to stop this was two years ago, and the next best time is as soon as humanly possible. I have said that generative AI is a group delusion in the past, and I repeat that claim today." - "we are approaching the limit of what the transformer-based architecture can do, if we haven’t already reached it. No amount of beating off about test-time compute and connecting Large Language Models to other Large Language Models is going to create a new use case for this technology" - "generative AI is OpenAI. The consumer adoption of this software has completely failed, and appears to be going nowhere fast. ChatGPT is sustained entirely on deranged, specious hype drummed up by a media industry" ... and my favorite ... - "I will keep writing this stuff until I’m proven wrong."
9
14
2
695
26,316
Inverse Gary Marcus ⏫ retweeted
Whatever you believe about the world I think we can all agree that P(P = NP) is increasing....
11
16
3
330
16,314