Pinned Tweet
Whenever we talk on X, please understand all my words are bracketed by "as I currently understand." I don't say it on every post only to save word count.
I'm comfortable knowing that tomorrow, I will understand some things differently.
Aaron Rich retweeted
The yahrzeit of Rabbi Daniel Zion begins this evening. This heroic chief rabbi of Bulgaria who saved 40,000 Jews in the Holocaust was an ardent disciple of Yeshua. vist.ly/5r4h5
Paul tells us to earnestly desire the spiritual gifts of God, but especially that we might prophesy.
Iāve heard numerous teachings on this subject, but most often I see disciples of Jesus understanding prophecy as grandiose proclamations from God foretelling future events.
In my reading today in 1 Samuel, I came across a footnote that better conveys what the Jewish-minded Paul was getting at.
The footnote says:
āThe Hebrew word for prophet literally means speaker. A prophet conveys the word of God; a seer foresees the future or directs people to lost or hidden property. The primary prophetic function of teaching and chastising had not yet begun in those days.ā
This helps us better understand Paulās instruction. He is encouraging us to earnestly seek to edify and build up Godās community through teaching, rebuke, correction, and training in righteousness, the purposes he elsewhere attributes to Scripture.
Paul isnāt calling us to aspire to become predictors of future events. He is calling us to earnestly desire the gifts that build up the community of Messiah, especially those that communicate Godās instruction, bring correction, and strengthen the Body in righteousness. Just like Jesusā kingdom message or repentance.
Prophecy is not about foretelling the future. It is about speaking the word of God to build up His people.
Something most Christianās arenāt taught. Our obedience to Jesus and *everything* He said isnāt an option.
Hearing cheers at your baptism and then returning to your life as usual isnāt discipleship.
Discipleship is radical life change - count the cost.
Jesus said, without carrying your cross, you cannot be his disciple. That is, without obeying him, you will not finish the race.
Read this article by @wscofield77 vist.ly/5pvrn
Aaron Rich retweeted
Shabbat shalom! This weekās Torah portion is Lech Lecha.
HaShem calls Abram to leave his homeland and journey to a land He will show him. Abram obeys, traveling to Canaan. A famine drives him to Egypt, where Sarai is abducted. Returning to Canaan, Abram and Lot separate. Abram rescues Lot and receives the blessing of Melchizedek. HaShem makes a covenant with Abram, promising countless descendants. Abram fathers Ishmael by Hagar. Circumcision (brit milah) becomes the sign of the covenant. Abram becomes Abraham, a father of nations.
Click here for the Bible readings and commentary articles. vist.ly/5pn8n
Read Judges 6:24ā27 and tell me whatās wrong.
I spotted something this morning. Itās a problem, and not a small one.
At first, I thought I must be misunderstanding the passage or that something was getting lost in translation. Iāve read over it all these years. So I started digging.
Turns out, the sages of Israel noticed the same problem centuries ago!
But hereās the kicker: I only caught 1/8 of it! The sages identified seven additional issues I had completely overlooked.
Now Iām curious to see who else catches it. Have you caught it before?
For my fellow Christians, Iāll give you a hint: Keep Acts 15 in mind as you read.
Read carefully. What do you see?
Kristallnacht in our day. By the grace of God not to that level, but synagogues and businesses suddenly get targeted in France.
The apostolic writings continue to speak authoritatively on matters of biblical faith and practice.
For a Christian to suggest, insinuate, or believe that the āNew Testamentā somehow diminishes, supersedes, or abrogates the Torah, the Prophets, and the Writings from which Jesus Himself taught is to undermine the very legitimacy of the apostles writings as Scripture.
If the apostles writings contradict the Scriptures that preceded them, they cannot themselves be Scripture.
If, however, they speak in harmony and concert with the Torah, Prophets, and Writings, they can stand as authoritative Scripture alongside them.
This is not a matter of theological preference or interpretation. It is a standard established in Godās own law. No Christian theology, doctrinal tradition, or creative misreading of the apostolic writings has the authority to overturn Godās law. Even Paul didnāt have the authority to overturn Gods law.
Deuteronomy 13:1ā5. Even a prophet who performs signs and wonders must be rejected if his message leads Godās people away from the commandments He has already given.
Aaron Rich retweeted
Widespread support of violence. A tower reaching the heavens. The news continues to show startling parallels to the weekly parashah. #noach vist.ly/5njc7
When someone declares something a fact, take a moment to fact-check it yourself. Jesus is, was, and always will be Jewish. And āYeshuaā was his name long before 1879.
The ancient Syriac Sinaiticus manuscript uses Yeshua in Matthew 1:21. Youāll need to brush up on your Old Syriac reading skills, but Iāll provide a link to the manuscript in the comments.
Since JDās anti-Jewish rant claimed that calling Jesus āYeshuaā began in 1879, here are a few more recent historical examples:
1181ā1204: Maimonides referred to him as Yeshua ha-Notzri.
1529: Christian Sebastian Münster used the name Yeshua in his writings.
1710: Caspar Calvƶr published Kevod Yeshua Mashiach (Glory of Yeshua Messiah). (Link and picture below)
Franz Delitzsch was a brilliant scholar, but he certainly didnāt invent the name.
Thereās nothing wrong with calling him Jesus. But throwing a temper tantrum because someone uses his Jewish name, while pretending that name has no historical basis, is simply absurd.
Fun Fact: No Christian was foolish enough to call Jesus "Yeshua" until a Judaizing Hebraist named Franz Delitzsch, of Jewish descent, called him that in 1879 as a supposed evangelism strategy to Jews.
Jesus' name is Greek. The angel gave it in Matthew 1:21. Matthew quotes the original language when the word matters, and no word matters more than Jesus' name. And yet, Matthew says His name is į¼øĪ·ĻοῦĻ.
Not Yeshua.
This is why He's called į¼øĪ·ĻĪæįæ¦Ļ more than 90 times in the New Testament, and called "Yeshua" exactly zero times. Claiming that it does so because the New Testament is written in Greek does not work - the New Testament preserves Hebrew names most of the time, and when it doesn't, it always explains the original: "Tabitha, that is Dorcas" and "Thomas, called Didymus."
There is no "Jesus, that is, Yeshua." It's just Jesus.
Like half of His disciples, Jesus' name was Greek. The Lexicon of Jewish Names of Antiquity records the names given to Jewish babies in that era, and Jewish parents gave their kids Greek names.
Why? It was Greco-Roman Culture. The Bible of Jesus, the Apostles, and First-century Jews was the Greek Septuagint (LXX). Every New Testament citation from Jesus quotes the LXX. He preferred it, obviously.
Hebrew was dead as a common tongue for hundreds of years. By this point, the Jews had been acclimated to Greek culture for three generations. How many of you are naming your kids in Latin? Few. Because it's dead.
You might have even heard that "Jesus is Greek for Yeshua." No, it isn't. You've been lied to.
First, that implies His name was originally Hebrew, which as you can see above, is incorrect. Second, determining which Hebrew name į¼øĪ·ĻĪæįæ¦Ļ should translate to is guesswork.
They might as well have pulled Yeshua out of a hat, because aside from Joshua (Yeshua) and Jeshu, Jesus is also translated as Yishwi, Abishua, and Yishwah. If their theory IS correct and Jesus' name is Aramaic or Hebrew, we would have NO IDEA which semitic form it was in, because the Bible doesn't tell us and neither does any written historical record.
So when Delitzsch called Him "Yeshua" in 1879, he might as well have called Him Yishwah. It's all poppycock.
And while the Jews did speak Aramaic (despite reading and speaking Greek), assuming Mary gave Jesus an Aramaic name because they're ethnic Hebrews is like assuming a family whose ancestors are from Mexico that has lived and multiplied inside America for a century must name their kid Juan instead of John. The logic does not follow.
It's called "assimilation" and the God-Man who preferred "the Son of Man" over "King of the Jews" was more than satisfied with a Greek name. And God the Father chose it.
Why was Jesus given a Greek name? Gentiles were THE ENTIRE POINT of Jesus coming. God saving Gentiles, not Jews, was the BIG REVEAL of Scripture.
Ephesians 3:4-6 says, āWhereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel.ā
So while God did plan to save some Jews, their salvation was not the mystery of God gloriously revealed in the gospel. Rather, it was that Gentiles would become heirs of Christ and partakers in Abraham's promise.
Jesus would come to be known as the Savior of the Gentiles. It's only fitting that Jesus should have a Gentile name. After all, Christ is OUR King.
Within Christianity we have made the soul a rudimentary concept and lost the mystery and awe behind it.
Gen 1:30 says animals have a × ×¤×© ×××, a living soul. But thatās only the surface of the mystery. The Jewish people understand 5 levels of the soul and not all are shared traits with animals. (Fascinating stuff to research!)
Whether or not animals have any presence beyond their physical bodies is an open debate and a mystery only God knows. Some ancient commentators believe there is an existence beyond the body, but not all agree. Hope is not lost, the mystery remains.
Aaron Rich retweeted
Does it ever seem like the events of the weekly Torah portion are playing out in the news? Hereās why. #breisheet vist.ly/5mqtb
Since the time of Ezra, the Jews have followed a regular cycle of Scripture readings, a practice alluded to by the apostles. Christians can read along: torahportions.org.
This week, it restarts, and so does your news cycle.
ffoz.org/messiah/articles/reā¦
Aaron Rich retweeted
Sometimes a single conversation can change the trajectory of your life. For Chaim Dauermann, one unsettling encounter forced him to confront his Jewish identity head on, a turning point that drew him deeper into his Jewish heritage and, eventually, to the Jewish Messiah, Yeshua.
Watch the full episode here: vist.ly/5mfqu
Aaron Rich retweeted
If the Torah shares the origin of Israel and the Jewish people, why is it still relevant to everyone?
In the same conversation, Iām shamed for drinking alcohol and shamed for deliberately avoiding a day centered on occultism and sorcery.
One is explicitly permitted in Scripture and even called a blessing. The other is expressly forbidden.
Aaron Rich retweeted
John 3:16 has been called āthe gospel in a nutshell,ā but Yeshua kept the gospel in a different nutshell: āRepent, the kingdom of heaven is at hand.ā Repentance requires more than just a change of mind or theological conviction; itās a life of turning from sin toward godliness and righteousness. When understood from a Jewish perspective, John 3:16 imparts the same urgent message. Itās about repentance to enter the kingdom and receive eternal life in the resurrection of the dead. To convey that message and preserve the world from perishing, God sent His Son, Yeshua, to the Jewish people and to the whole world, including you.
The Narrow Path is a year-long Torah Club study track that returns the real teachings of Yeshua to their Jewish context to help you hear his voice, understand his commandments, and walk the narrow path upon which he leads. Learn more or sign up at torahclub.org/tnp
#biblestudy #messianicjudaism #thenarrowpath
Aaron Rich retweeted
To obey Yeshua is to repent from sin and grow in maturity. There is a tried-and-true systematic approach: musar. vist.ly/5kxtj










