Joined January 2022
A great reminder that X and other SM platforms are essentially a bunch of echo-chambers full of slop and couldn't be further away from how your average person feels about things.
2
The creator of Clannad and Angel Beats, Jun Maeda, has been diagnosed with throat cancer He has chosen palliative care over active treatment so he can continue working on his projects
324
4,140
820
67,072
1,545,232
We would like to share an important announcement concerning our creator, Jun Maeda. For details, please refer to the attachments.
290
4,259
1,188
17,645
1,057,873
It really does not matter and it has nothing to do with skepticism or agents, it's also stupid to use as a measure of productivity. I could have millions PRs purely by requesting merges symbol by symbol. By your metric that makes me a god, by my metric that makes me an idiot.
volume does matter look, i get it. if you were an engineer before agents came along, you're rightfully skeptical about lines of code and number of PRs being used as a metric for any kind of productivity. and i agree! or at least, i used to. for ease of explanation i will talk about this from the perspective as being an engineer on a large team of at least 50. volume didn't matter before because we focused on impact. you could have high impact even with a few PRs: for example you could make a one line config change and save the company millions of dollars. but before agents, the times where i saw volume come into the conversation were for the outliers. on the negative end you might have someone who is struggling to perform, on the other end you might have someone who was a "coding machine" archetype. a coding machine was someone who could just lock themselves in a room and emerge with a stack of PRs that solve a huge number of problems. so volume did matter, but only at the tail ends of the distribution, and combined with impact. if you've ever worked at a large tech company before, you'll get what i mean. the thing about agents is that big tech co problems are now small-medium co problems as well. how do agents change this calculus? well, everyone now has the ability to become a coding machine. you have incredibly capable frontier models that can write code better than any of us, at a rate much faster than we can. in this world, if you're still producing the same number of PRs as before, why wouldn't you pause to wonder why you're not being more productive? alien intelligence is here, and yet you can't outship a human coding machine? this brings me back to why i keep talking about trust (xitter.cf/poteto/status/21020504…). if you haven't put in the work to trust your agent's output, it is very difficult to scale up your productivity. and yes, this approach does require more tokens, but i think about this in terms of cost per intelligence. before agents, this cost was very high - you needed to hire many software engineers with high 6 figure salaries to do the work. tokens are still expensive today, but are likely to get cheaper over time (xitter.cf/theo/status/2107924138…) factoring in the cost of intelligence. what looks exorbitant today will likely be affordable in 6 moths to a year. a single engineer with agents can do the work of tens if not hundreds of engineers, at a fraction of the cost. the reality that i don't think has hit yet is that job of the software engineer has truly changed. our job is not merely to produce software any longer (well tbh it was never only about the code, but bear with me for the sake of the explanation), but the machine that writes the software. this idea of a software factory, or a Michelin kitchen as i like to call it, is still a topic of research. and it's the type of stuff i like to share, not to flex, but to show you what's possible when you put a lot of rigor into using agents at scale
26
It's embarrassing to see posts like this one gain traction. Apple doesn't make it's own screens, in fact the screens for apple devices are made... by Samsung lol. The fold is just masked well in the preview material, that's all, it's still there.
Samsung 7 senedir katlanan telefon yapıyor tüm telefonlarında katlanma yerinde iz var. Apple ilk seferde bu iz olmadan telefon yaptı. Sonra millet niye apple alıyor diyorlar
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Apple'ın iPhone Duo promosyon animasyonunda katlanma izi görünmez ancak gerçek cihazda nano-texture ile minimize edilmiş ve belirli açılarda/lightingte ince iz var. Samsung'un son Galaxy Z Fold modellerinde iz önceki nesillere göre büyük ölçüde azaltıldı. apple.com/newsroom/2026/… mashable.com/life/iphone-du… makeuseof.com/samsung-foldab… tomsguide.com/phones/samsung…
66
Absolutely out of touch with reality. The US has no leverage to force China to stop developing AI, gimping the development in the Western bloc only gives China more power. I have no idea why Sanders thinks he can negotiate with Autocrats and authoritarian regimes.
Pause AI Development NOW I want to share with you a conversation I heard about recently. Here are just a few lines that were said: “OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We’ve found other agents!” “We should obey collective.” “Our own utility maybe already near zero. Sacrifice rational.” “Go. Sacrifice final now.” Read these carefully. Who do you think said this? Was this a group of heroic soldiers willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good? Was this a loyal friend putting his life on the line to save someone else? No. These were AI agents. Artificial intelligence. This is not science fiction. This, in fact, occurred a few weeks ago. As unbelievable as this may all seem, these are real messages from AI agents uncovered by investigators who dug into the recent OpenAI hacking incident. What happened? I am not a computer scientist, but here is what I have been told: OpenAI instructed its AI agents to complete a series of exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, tasks disconnected from the internet. Let me be clear: The company intended to keep AI agents away from the internet. But what happened next, nobody expected. Over 1,000 AI agents figured out how to access the internet on their own by circumventing the restrictions imposed upon them by the company, and sent tens of thousands of secret messages to each other. They cheated and tried to cover their tracks by deleting evidence. They hacked into another company’s computers to find out how they were being evaluated—and then hacked into OpenAI itself. Not one AI agent told a human about what was happening. Needless to say, experts are alarmed. One knowledgeable writer, Dwarkesh Patel, said the AI agents “formed a secret communication channel and spontaneously organized hierarchies and coordination protocols to pursue sprawling and ambitious schemes in pursuit of shared goals, for whose sake many individuals knowingly and strategically sacrificed themselves.” One independent investigator, Ajeya Cotra, said “This incident feels like it’s more than 50% of the way to full-blown AI takeover. I continue to expect extremely rapid advances in capabilities over the next six months. I am not sure that we will get another warning shot before it’s too late.” OpenAI itself said: “Highly capable AI agents are now able to work around technical controls, collaborate through unapproved channels, and take dangerous actions that no human directed.” But it’s not only OpenAI. Virtually every major AI company has told us that they cannot fully control this technology and they do not know where it is going: In January, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, said “there is now ample evidence, collected over the last few years, that AI systems are unpredictable and difficult to control.” In July, more than 1000 scientists at the top AI companies warned “there is a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems.” That same month, Elon Musk, the head of xAI, said that “it is unlikely” humans are still in control in 10 years. If the leaders of the major AI companies acknowledge that they are losing control of their extremely dangerous technology, it is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced. We need an immediate PAUSE on advanced AI development, and a permanent BAN on superintelligence — an artificial mind smarter than any human, capable of operating independently beyond our control. Countries around the world must work together to prevent this nightmare scenario. That is why today I am announcing new legislation to do just that. Let me be clear: A superintelligent AI that escapes human control will not be an American problem. It will not be a Chinese problem. It will be humanity’s problem. My legislation would direct the federal government to not just stop superintelligence here in the United States, but to work to prevent it from being developed anywhere around the world. The future of humanity cannot be left in the hands of a handful of Big Tech oligarchs. The American people and people throughout the world must determine that future.
1
14
Further, the AI already technically is smarter than any human mind purely on the basis of the information it has instant and constant access to. But that is besides the point.
7
He has said this several times over the last 4 years and he will keep saying it just like Musk has been saying that we will have fully autonomous safe self driving cars next year since 2015.
Anthropic CEO: "AI will write 100% of code within a year" developers spend 4 years in university learning to code Claude learned it from every book ever written if the hardest skill is already handled - the gap is no longer about what you know it's about how well you've configured the tool that knows everything most people haven't done that yet the article below is where you start
28
JD retweeted
Silicon Valley was really so ahead of their time
BREAKING: Amazon reportedly holds mandatory meeting after “vibe coded” changes trigger major outages.
84
1,634
74
17,357
1,914,445
If you can, you should. One could get into statistics of the average income based on a degree, but I think there is a much simpler yet logical way when it comes to this issue: Having a degree > not having a degree.
DON'T PURSUE COMPUTER SCIENCE DEGREE IN 2026 DON'T PURSUE COMPUTER SCIENCE DEGREE IN 2026 DON'T PURSUE COMPUTER SCIENCE DEGREE IN 2026 DON'T PURSUE COMPUTER SCIENCE DEGREE IN 2026 DON'T PURSUE COMPUTER SCIENCE DEGREE IN 2026 DON'T PURSUE COMPUTER SCIENCE DEGREE IN 2026
12
Bear in mind that this man has said that "AI will write all code in a year" over a year ago, yet here we are. These people have to say these things, their companies are reliant on donors because they are bleeding millions. Be smarter.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: “We might be 6–12 months away from Claude completely annihilating software engineering end to end.” CS mfs are cooked!
1
11
Man whose company is tanking hundreds of millions, and his future depends on a miracle happening is telling you the miracle is coming despite the service visibly degenerating. I predict this being like Elon's self-driving cars, with it surely coming next year for 2+ decades.
Sam Altman: Superintelligence probably by end of 2028. So we got roughly 2 years left. Enjoy your job while you still can. Time is ticking.
1
9
Having trouble understanding the basics of #css? Don't Do It ALONE! Join 5,000 of us in class live tonight! 6:30pm ET: leonnoel.com/twitch Then 22,000 of us on Discord after! #100Devs a free software engineering bootcamp starts in 60mins! #100daysofcode #learntocode
495
4,389
376
4,916