Jack retweeted
Let me explain why EVERY continent, every culture, every religion restricted women deeply.
They knew something feminism pretends not to know:
Feminism is not healing women. It's RECRUITING broken women to break other women.
A woman's mind was designed to ABSORB. To feel. To connect. That's her superpower when she's around GOOD women. That's her destruction when she's around BROKEN women.
A man's mind breaks in war. From failure. From life beating him.
A woman's mind breaks from IDEAS. From indecency. From too much exposure. Too much sex, too much gossip, too much victimhood, too much broken women whispering in her ear.
The old ones knew: Protect a woman's EYES and EARS, you protect her MIND. Protect her mind, you protect her future. Lose her mind, you lost HER.
Give a woman 8 hours of TikTok, sex positivity, "all men are trash," Instagram baddies, trauma stories and she will adopt trauma that was NEVER hers.
She was never abused, now she thinks she was.
She was never oppressed, now she feels oppressed.
She has a husband who pays every bill, protects her, loves her kids now she thinks she's a SLAVE.
That's not awakening. That's BRAINWASHING.
Put two women in the SAME marriage.
Unrecruited woman sees: My family. My home. My purpose.
Recruited woman sees: My trauma. My oppression. My unpaid labor.
Same husband. Same house. Same kids.
Different SOFTWARE installed.
Patriarchy wasn't controlling women. It was installing a firewall against viruses.
Feminism removed the firewall and called it freedom.
Now the virus is everywhere. Humanity is FUCKED.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Jack retweeted
Just when I thought I was getting close to the bottom of the rabbi(t)hole, a whole abyss opens up. 🤦🏻♂️🕳️
Gonna need more flashlights 🔦🔦🔦
Jack retweeted
What a weird time to be alive. There's an actual genocide happening to Whites and we're not supposed to talk about it. I'm witnessing the end of my race, and if I speak out about it, it makes people uncomfortable. Absolute insanity.
Jack retweeted
Whites will eventually be a minority in America.
They will receive exactly zero of the benefits given "minorities" today.
Because it was never about minorities or equality, it was always anti-white oppression.
Jack retweeted
In case you are having trouble figuring out what’s going on here is a summary:
Anthropic and OpenAI desperately need regulatory capture or they are going to go out of business, and the Trump administration is not inclined to give it to them
The Democratic party currently has no platform, as Trump is doing fine (other than perhaps the
Iran war but Americans don’t really care about that), but they have identified that AI and data centers are a hot topic that they can ride
So these two somewhat desperate groups have teamed up to run a psyop around the actual real topic of AI safety, greatly exaggerating the risks, with the understanding that if the Democrats get back into power they will provide the regulatory capture needed to keep these companies alive
In return, these companies will support the Democratic Party and help to enforce left-wing ideology through the models
Kind of sucks, but that’s what’s happening, and we need to oppose it because it will not be good if this plan succeeds
Sitting down?
1970 - USA
White Population: 88%
Immigrant Households on Welfare: 6%
2020 - USA
White Population: 62%
Immigrant Households on Welfare: 59%
Today - USA
White Population: 56%
Immigrant Households on Welfare: 61%
But don’t complain about it because that’s racist.
Jack retweeted
🚨BREAKING: The Trump Administration has invoked the long-unenforced Immigration Act of 1882 to prohibit entry into the United States of “any convict, lunatic, idiot, or any person unable to take care of himself or herself without becoming a public charge.”
Ultimately, this will allow the Trump Administration to deny green cards to immigrants who are likely to use federal welfare, food stamps, or Medicaid, and to revoke the green cards of immigrants who are currently using these programs.
The new rule is set to take effect Friday, September 18.
As a result, 5.6 million immigrants are expected to lose access to those benefits, and American taxpayers are expected to save $13 billion per year.
Follow: @MorseReport
Jack retweeted
Govern Me Harder Daddy, only a One World Government that gives me & 2 friends a monopoly business cartel over the biggest industry in the world can save the world from how dangerous my own product is.
Jack retweeted
The intelligence community is preparing a major false flag operation to be blamed on open source AI so they can justify banning it.
Most likely target? The shutting down of a regional power grid, causing chaos and disruptions while the media runs the "open source AI is dangerous" narrative.
The legislation to ban open source AI, Chinese models, and uncensored models will be ready to go of course, just like the Patriot Act expansion was ready to go right after 9/11 (which was also a government-engineered false flag operation).
Jack retweeted
After today's events, I'm rooting harder than ever for open source to succeed.
I'm also rooting harder than ever for U.S. frontier AI labs to financially collapse into bankruptcy and ruin.
Why? Because the danger to our world isn't AI itself. The real danger is AI being centrally controlled by the kind of scheming, nefarious, dishonest cretins who would engineered an "AI doom op" to try to scare everybody into supporting government controls over AI models.
THOSE PEOPLE are the danger to humanity. And they want monopoly control over all AI technology. Not to save humanity, but to ENSLAVE humanity.
In a future with AI, our only shot at human freedom is through decentralized, open source AI. And that's exactly what these frontier AI labs are now trying to stop.
Jack retweeted
We cannot allow Silicon Valley to monopolize AI.
Monopoly building is their core business model. It is what they know how to do. Take something that begins as an open frontier, pour billions of dollars into it, centralize the infrastructure, capture the distribution channels, lock everyone into a handful of platforms, and then position themselves as the indispensable gatekeepers between ordinary people and the technology itself. We watched this happen with search. We watched it happen with social media. We watched it happen with mobile computing, cloud infrastructure, digital advertising, and online commerce. We cannot allow it to happen again with artificial intelligence.
The stakes are simply too high.
AI is rapidly becoming a new layer of civilization itself. It will increasingly mediate how people search for information, write software, create art, conduct research, educate their children, build businesses, practice medicine, communicate, and make decisions. Whoever controls that layer acquires enormous power over everything built on top of it. If five corporations control the models, the compute, the interfaces, and the rules governing what those systems are permitted to say and do, then five corporations effectively become the librarians, teachers, editors, programmers, researchers, and increasingly the intellectual gatekeepers of civilization.
That cannot be our future.
There is something particularly insulting about being told that this technology somehow belongs exclusively to the corporations that trained the models. Trained them on what?
Us.
Our books. Our websites. Our photographs. Our conversations. Our code. Our research papers. Our journalism. Our art. Our forums. Our public archives. Decades of accumulated human knowledge and creativity were vacuumed into enormous datasets and transformed into these systems. Silicon Valley did not conjure this knowledge out of thin air. The models are standing on a mountain of human civilization that billions of people spent generations creating.
These systems also do not live in some magical digital cloud floating above the earth. They run on our electrical grids. They occupy enormous data centers built on our land. They consume energy generated by our infrastructure. Their chips move across supply chains protected by our governments and ultimately by our people. Their companies enjoy legal protections, capital markets, universities, roads, communications networks, and political stability created and maintained by the civilization around them.
After drawing upon all of that, we are supposed to accept a future where a tiny priesthood in Silicon Valley owns the intelligence layer of the digital world and rents access back to everyone else on whatever terms they decide?
No.
The models belong to all of us. The knowledge underneath them is our inheritance. The infrastructure supporting them exists inside our civilization. The people whose lives and work generated their training material are not incidental to this story. They are the story.
This is why open models matter. Local models matter. Open-source tooling matters. Independent compute matters. Alternative AI companies matter. The ability to download a model, modify it, run it yourself, build on top of it, and decide for yourself what it should do is not some niche hobby for programmers. It is one of the most important technological questions of our generation.
We need thousands of AI companies, thousands of models, thousands of applications, and millions of people experimenting freely with this technology. We need models running in massive data centers and models running on laptops in basements. We need businesses, churches, schools, families, researchers, developers, and communities building AI systems around their own values and their own needs. No central committee in San Francisco should determine the intellectual boundaries of artificial intelligence for eight billion people.
Jack retweeted
Democrats should remember that just because they want humanity destroyed doesn't mean AI wants the same thing
Jack retweeted
The biggest threat to Anthropic and its alleged $2+ trillion valuation is open-source AI.
We’re now entering the max fear mongering stage. Open-source AI could theoretically destroy enormous amounts of value in the snap of a finger.
The incentive is obvious. Protect the wealth, power, and valuations that have been created around centralized AI. This is a chess game to preserve that power and push valuations as high as possible, while preventing open source from throwing a wrench into the entire plan.
There is currently a massive PR effort to get the public behind government “protection” of these companies, under the guise of protecting the public.
Ultimately, centralized control over the most impactful technology in existence risks becoming a small group of people trying to play God.
Jack retweeted
>dude with no followers
>overnight gets 120M views on an average AI Doomer post
>gets on CNN and MSM instantly
>follow the money
>it's Clinton and EA billionaires
>Computational propaganda experts behind the scenes
Yeah, it was an op. Stay frosty, friends.
Replying to @brianchau57
"ok, but it's not like you can prove they're engaged in propaganda"
that's where you're wrong
Jack retweeted
There seems to be a large scale, coordinated "AI will kill us" push happening on X right now.
Same talking points, same framing, repeated over and over from different accounts and researchers.
The timing is interesting too, especially with AI progress accelerating this fast.
At this point, it feels less like debate and more like a coordinated decel/doomer campaign.
AI literally just solved one of the biggest problems in mathematics and designed a drug showing age reversal effects in humans, and they’re doubling down on "AI will kill us."
The disconnect from what’s actually happening is unreal.
Jack retweeted
BREAKING: ex-Anthropic Doomer Jacob Coxon tied to "Newspeak", British NGO involved with "hacking" democracy, Hillary Clinton, prison abolition, and extinction rebellion
Jack retweeted
"AI safety" increasingly appears to be yet another way to implement Communism via backdoor.





























