Joined December 2011
New Content Alert: Linear regression says one subgroup's "Very Satisfied" share fell by 8pp. The actual data show it rose by 7pp. Sign flipped — and the model was properly specified. This is how linear routinely breaks on Likert outcomes. 🧵(+ two posts & a shiny app!)
1
3
2
140
I like the causal story and its implications re more collaboration early in the research process. But the specific issue Cole discusses here (interesting articles are less robust) might be explained by selection (in this case submission to Sociological Forum). >
We've had the same problems with publishing for a long time (ex. vet your research before you undertake it). Why are they still problems? This from Cole, editor of Sociological Forum, in 1993.
2
3
226
Ironically, my (non-criminological) dissertation, and the work that came out of it, is likely similarly biased (selected on survivors/successful coaches) because I ignored some critical early feedback from one of my committee members! For example: sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
1
72
🧵New Preprint: Is "self-control" a real psychological entity, an emergent property, or a statistical fiction? Our new paper challenges criminology's hidden assumptions about measurement. w/ @Jake_Day4 @agrahamphd
1
2
2
108
Landmark new article in @Theory_Society from @RealJonBrauer and Jacob Day. Criminology requires an important shift in priority and perspective to prevent further deterioration of the field's legitimacy and capacity to be truth-seeking. "By confronting the crisis directly and reimagining the very forms of knowledge we produce, criminology can move closer to fulfilling its potential as a cumulative scientific enterprise." Check out the article here (open access!): link.springer.com/article/10…
3
4
3
21
3,459
The goal: Transforming criminological knowledge products so they constitute the accumulation of real "money in the bank" for precise, falsifiable theories & thus contribute to cumulative theoretical development. (12/12) Full paper w/@Jake_Day4: doi.org/10.1007/s11186-025-0…
1
1
2
120
Replying to @JohnHolbein1
We reanalyzed a published null, showing data lack signal to trust oft-cited null interpretation (large effects also plausible given same data; measurement decisions matter). Based on citation patterns though, I'd say we failed to "overturn" anything. 🤔🤷 journals.sagepub.com/doi/ful…
1
4
231
New Content Alert: In a new blog post, Jon & Jake offer a pluralist response to Andrew Wheeler’s call to “build stuff” and discuss their recent preprints, in which they suggest how to move beyond Monopoly money publications to genuine scientific currency reluctantcriminologists.com/…
1
4
3
284
Replying to @lonecrim
Well, it was written by a couple dopes... 🤷🤣 Thanks for sharing! Look forward to your feedback.
1
1
2
134
New preprint! Criminology faces a "precision crisis," hindering cumulative theoretical development unlike physics/biology. We argue current practices yield vague theories & archaic statistical summaries, producing "Monopoly money" (@a_m_mastroianni) knowledge. #Criminology
#SocArXiv: Money in the Bank: Progressive Problem Shifts in Criminological Science osf.io/5af2s
1
3
5
320
#SocArXiv: Money in the Bank: Progressive Problem Shifts in Criminological Science osf.io/5af2s
3
1
7
1,602
My self-perception as a (social) scientist perfectly encapsulated in a single margin note.
1
44
Check out my first preprint! In it, @Jake_Day4 & I encourage ordinal modeling for analyzing ordinal outcomes. We show how to quantify effect magnitudes w/greater accuracy & precision, helping us move us beyond just interpreting stat significance & broad directional statements.
#SocArXiv: Pursuing Precision in Criminology: Why Ordinal Data Demand Ordinal Methods osf.io/fet4d
1
2
1
8
495