FREEDOM2025Jams@buildamericaup

Republicans lost Congress, and the first fucking order of business is apparently REELECTING THE IDIOTS WHO LOST IT. The electoral bodies are barely cold, the majority is gone, and John Thune is already maneuvering to keep his leadership job. In Washington, spectacular failure apparently comes with an automatic renewal clause. These useless bastards controlled Congress with a Republican president in the White House and still couldn't deliver the SAVE Act. They had the votes to lead, the authority to legislate, and an electorate demanding results. Instead, they spent their majority hiding behind Senate procedure, protecting their precious traditions, and producing enough excuses to wallpaper the fucking Capitol. And now they want another term running the operation? ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR GODDAMN MINDS? The same politicians who couldn't summon the urgency to fulfill their campaign promises suddenly possess boundless energy for leadership elections. Ron Johnson wants time to reconsider who should lead after a humiliating defeat. Thune's crowd wants the voting finished before the political wreckage stops smoking. Apparently, accountability has a shorter expiration date than a carton of milk. Meanwhile, their remaining congressional majority is bleeding away by the hour. Judges need confirming. Legislation needs passing. The SAVE Act remains unfinished. Every wasted day hands Democrats another opportunity to inherit the power Republicans couldn't figure out how to fucking use. And the most revolting part? The finger-pointing. Suddenly, Trump's policies explain everything. The congressional leadership that couldn't deliver its own agenda now wants to conduct the autopsy, assign blame, and collect another paycheck for managing the corpse. This is political failure elevated into a professional advancement program, where the architects of defeat demand another opportunity to supervise the consequences. The Republican establishment drove its congressional majority straight into a ditch, climbed out blaming the president, and is now fighting over which incompetent motherfucker gets to climb back behind the wheel of the burning wreckage. (article below)

Yes, we can allow the illegals a path that have a proven work record, taxes paid, no welfare, have a home and family but we need a permanent cut-off date for anyone in the future. We can’t continue to reward this behavior! There are caravans headed this way today.

Trump is right. It’s hard to deport someone who has worked hard for 15 years and broken no laws beyond entering the country illegally. I spent over a decade teaching in a community with many illegal immigrants and their children. I knew genuinely good people, wonderful families, and incredible kids. They weren't abstractions to me. They were people I cared about and wanted to see succeed. I understand the emotional difficulty of enforcing immigration law. I've experienced it firsthand. But there's a fundamental difference between judging an individual through the lens of personal experience and governing a nation through the rule of law. It's easy to make exceptions when we're confronted with a sympathetic story. We see a hardworking father, a devoted mother, or an innocent child, and naturally want to spare them hardship. But my personal feelings about those individuals cannot determine whether the law applies to them. Nor can anyone else's. And with immigration, the consequences extend far beyond any individual case. We're deciding who may enter our country, remain here, and become part of our national community. If those decisions are ultimately determined by who manages to get here and whose story moves us most, the consent of the governed becomes increasingly meaningless. The hardest cases are precisely when our principles matter most, because the entire purpose of having laws is to establish rules that transcend our individual sympathies, prejudices, and emotions. If enforcing the law depends on our sympathy for those who break it, we no longer have the rule of law. We have a collection of suggestions subject to the whims of our emotions.