data science PhD student 🧬🧠🖥️ scRNA data, retina & brain | sci-comm 🤖❤️🌍 AI & sustainability | easily sidetracked by small details in plots & birds 📈🔍🦜

Tübingen, Germany
Joined March 2020
In their Specious Art paper, Chari & @lpachter claim that tSNE/UMAP are as arbitrary as a random elephant shape. But are they? We show in our comment that this is false and throws the tSNE/UMAP baby out with the bathwater! Details in 🧵& paper: biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/… 1/8
It's time to stop making t-SNE & UMAP plots. In a new preprint w/ Tara Chari we show that while they display some correlation with the underlying high-dimension data, they don't preserve local or global structure & are misleading. They're also arbitrary.🧵biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/…
4
72
10
352
221,957
PS: If anyone needs additional reasons to leave this place, here is one: Musk endorsed the German right-nationalist AfD — a party that spreads hate against migrants and constantly lies about climate change. Unacceptable!
I won't be reading, posting or replying here in the foreseeable future. Find me (and many other science & sci-comm people) on the other site, where skies are still blue! 🦋
1
6
400
I won't be reading, posting or replying here in the foreseeable future. Find me (and many other science & sci-comm people) on the other site, where skies are still blue! 🦋
1
526
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
Narrative on X: 🦋 has no AI/ML and just talks about itself My actual feed on 🦋:
58
62
20
1,265
241,901
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
This other site is starting to gel. You can find me there.
9
6
102
35,517
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
I am very skeptical of the AI/ML/computational methods to predict protein-protein interactions. Prove me wrong. I present a challenge for anyone who claims they can predict protein-protein interactions. 1/n
21
76
11
452
107,009
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
Another example of what I @b_mittelstadt @c_russl termed careless speech. Subtle hallucinations are dangerous & developers are not (yet) liable for them. We argue they should. See paper: Do LLMs have a legal duty to tell the truth? tinyurl.com/435jba5p tinyurl.com/4wpske2s
2
11
1
24
2,650
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
We updated our ICLR dataset (see github.com/berenslab/iclr-da…) with blind 2025 submissions to @iclr_conf. Over 10k submissions this year. I like how this embedding (SBERT + tSNE) shows which ML areas are old-school and which ones are currently booming.
2
36
2
230
47,249
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
Over the past few months, our Interpretability team has put out a number of smaller research updates. Here’s a thread of some of the things we've been up to:
27
170
17
1,866
277,960
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
The vocabulary of systems neuroscience may appear daunting to many. Here's a short dictionary of common terms. BTW if you use them in your papers and grants you will have greater success
11
110
17
663
109,746
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
Warum lügt die @CSU? Kurz gesagt: Um von echten Problemen abzulenken, also um euch zu verarschen. Also kuschelt eure Haustiere, widersprecht so einem Mist und lasst uns die Probleme lösen, die euch im Alltag stören und nicht welche, die die Union erfunden hat 🐶😽❤️
1,152
2,001
235
11,180
722,531
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
Sequencing folks. You seem to use UMAP all the time. But everyone is making fun of it. Someone must be willing to defend it?
What is the question to which umap is the answer?
8
2
41
20,589
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
🤖🧠NOW OUT IN PNAS🧠🤖 Language models show many surprising behaviors. E.g., they can count 30 items more easily than 29 In Embers of Autoregression, we explain such effects by analyzing what LMs are trained to do pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.23… Major updates since the preprint! 1/n
9
82
11
359
56,361
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
Datamapplot 0.4 is out now, and has far more powerful and effective interactive plots. Here is an example of a Data Map of 2.4 million papers on ArXiv, ready to be explored.
39
357
37
2,362
217,725
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
Nobel prize for t-SNE!
BREAKING NEWS The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the 2024 #NobelPrize in Physics to John J. Hopfield and Geoffrey E. Hinton “for foundational discoveries and inventions that enable machine learning with artificial neural networks.”
6
5
50
10,360
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
The strange state of current publishing. I think some stats on our recent Cellstates paper provide interesting food for thought. The preprint was put on BioRxiv and within 3 months there were ~8500 abstract views and >2000 PDF downloads. We also submitted it to PCB 6-11-2023 1/n
4
38
4
146
49,653
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
PSA: If you don't want your X posts used to train Grok, you now have to explicitly opt-out. Go to xitter.cf/settings/grok_settings and uncheck the box. If link doesn't work, go to Settings->Privacy and Safety->Grok
6
83
9
185
27,586
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
ICML 2024 (held in Vienna) registrations vs. registrations *per million inhabitants* by country. The barplot of registrations on the log scale was shown yesterday during the opening. I took a photo, digitized with WebPlotDigitizer, and normalized per capita. #ICML2024 @icmlconf
1
6
1
39
4,501
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
"The Harris campaign has seen a massive influx of donations, often from people who haven't donated before. This is democracy working as intended, folks!" Super happy to see donations, but "democracy as intended" is more about voting with your vote than your money, honestly.
5
2
42
4,125
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
Excited to be in Vienna at ICML to present my work with @samgreydanus on scaling _down_ deep learning with MNIST-1D! We show how one can study serious deep learning with n=5000 and d=40. Paper: openreview.net/forum?id=n9pr… Code: github.com/greydanus/mnist1d… Find me at poster session 1.
1
8
4
69
5,766
Jan Lause 🟦 @janlause.bsky.social🦉 retweeted
Few evolutionary psychologists engage with the modern genomic literature. Brendan Zietsch is an exception and he has a new paper out, criticising explanations for heritable variation based on balancing selection. He's pulling no punches.
12
92
14
508
102,446