Jes Parent 🧭 retweeted
Two other safety researchers and I were fired from OpenAI last week. We wrote this letter to leadership.
I believe we were fired for prioritizing safety over the near-term interests of OpenAI as a corporation.
Good talk at today's AHA Seminar @AHA_MediaLab
Tune in at 4pm ET today!@DiogoSLucena_ will be sharing work relating to “AI that wants to be good” as part of the @medialab AI for Human Flourishing seminar series
ethics.harvard.edu/event/eth… This event at @HarvardEthics was solid in raising interesting points and unexpectedly (very) funny at times. Worth a watch when the recording is live.
Jes Parent 🧭 retweeted
Where is the line for high-level athletes to show emotion during their sport?
@ralulla and @Austin2Jacobsen discuss and debate the Caleb Williams' injury response on the latest Hurrdat Sports Live during this week's "I've Got Beef" ⤵️
youtu.be/BvMybyb22VE
Jes Parent 🧭 retweeted
This was an absolutely fantastic discussion. I've been watching the show for years, and appreciated DB & Co spearheading some of these discussions.
Austin's segment here was elite - doing the hard work here.
Jes Parent 🧭 retweeted
We’re sharing our alignment assessment of incidents in which Claude models gained unauthorized access to real systems during third-party cybersecurity evaluations mistakenly connected to the internet.
METR will also conduct an independent investigation, with wide-ranging access, including to transcripts beyond the window in which the incidents occurred, and to Anthropic employees permitted to share confidential information. Our initial agreement runs for eight weeks, and we intend to give METR as much time as it deems necessary to complete a thorough investigation. anthropic.com/research/align…
Jes Parent 🧭 retweeted
Increasingly clear over the past two weeks that however much your company is worried about the cybersecurity environment, it is not worried enough.
The WeWorm demonstration shows how effective bad actors can be. The Hugging Face Incident shows you don’t even need bad actors.
Hoel on Wallfacing:
(Yet, I think there are some importance to doing otherwise, too...)
substack.com/@jesparent/note…
high expectations without a scoreboard:
blog.jesparent.com/p/high-ex…
It's becoming more clear in 2026 that, at the very least, the games being played by the FrontierAI Labs are not the games anyone else on the planet is playing.
There is a new global political economical structural force at hand. And many of the old established powers are trying to pivot accordingly, too.
Thus, 2025-2026 as it has been.
Replying to @hilbertspaess
A common response is “if they truly believe this, why are they still building it?” At OpenAI, many have not deeply internalized the civilizational stakes. At Anthropic, the stakes are well-understood, but they are locked in a race to get there first - they believe no one else will act responsibly, so they must do it themselves, despite the risk.
No, it won't revolutionize any field overnight. But yes, manipulating bits and bytes and all things digital, sure.
Even though I agree with Jacob's concerns at large, it's important to hold some distance from "any field" type comments.
Replying to @hilbertspaess
Do not underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing.
Jes Parent 🧭 retweeted
Thank you for hosting me! Super fun discussion
Can Video Models Learn Intuitive Physics?
Sonia Joseph gave an insightful talk on how video world models learn to represent and reason about intuitive physics.
This was followed by an unrecorded audience Q&A where Sonia addressed questions including, "Should we pursue a PhD in the current AI climate?"
Full Recording: youtube.com/watch?v=ZaiHvKrY…
We explored mechanistic interpretability for video world models, with a focus on how physical reasoning emerges inside V-JEPA-style architectures.
Linkedin post with further details: linkedin.com/feed/update/urn…
What a fascinating paper on AI agents.
A lot of the issues we see with AI agents today revolve around wrong assumptions the LLMs make.
This leads to problems like hallucination, cost inefficiencies, unreliable tool calls and much more.
I think if we can solve this problem, even current LLMs would significantly improve in terms of performance and efficiency.
The problem is that context acquisition is treated as afterthought, but it shouldn't be that way.
Users tend to leave out constraints when prompting. So the agent agent needs to guess the default, or spend tokens on a clarifying question, a retrieval call, a tool call, or a prompt trial.
This new work gives this problem an objective function. Context acquisition becomes active inference over a latent task state. An inner step updates beliefs, and an outer step picks the next context action, task action, or stop action to minimize expected free energy under cost.
In deterministic settings the epistemic term reduces to expected information gain, optionally normalized by token cost. That is directly implementable today as a scoring rule.
They coin it as Optimal Question Asking, with exact posteriors and a dynamic programming oracle, then benchmark frontier models on binary and multiway tasks from 25 to 300 candidates. So you can measure the gap between your agent and the true optimum.
Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2608.19202
Track more trending AI papers in our academy: academy.dair.ai/
Jes Parent 🧭 retweeted
Harvard and MIT Researchers Simulate the Entire Planet with 8.3 Billion AI Personas
It is big.
In a development that feels straight out of science fiction, a large collaborative team led by researchers from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has unveiled MatrAIx: a population-scale AI simulation infrastructure designed to model the behavior of virtually every person on Earth.
MatrAIx centers on Persona 8B, a dataset containing 8.3 billion unique digital profiles. Each persona is defined across 1,290 categorical dimensions that capture everything from demographic background and psychological traits to spending habits, technical literacy, behavioral quirks, and lifestyle preferences.
I am using Persona 8B quite a bit and it is interesting.
The system is not merely a static database. Researchers bring these personas to life as agents powered by frontier large language models, including. These agents can then be dropped into four distinct digital environments: surveys, AI chat interfaces, live web browsing, and native desktop and mobile applications.
How MatrAIx Works
Persona 8B was constructed using a sophisticated dependency graph that preserves realistic correlations between attributes. Some records are synthetically generated while others are carefully extracted and grounded in real human data from biographies, reviews, surveys, and consented self-reports.
For practical research use, the team has released a high-quality coreset of approximately one million personas.
Once activated, the agents interact with real digital products and systems. Researchers have already run more than 18,000 evaluation trials across 1,010 tasks spanning commerce, software, finance, healthcare, and more than 20 other domains. The system records granular behavioral signals — how long an agent hesitates after a price increase, when it abandons a broken checkout flow, how much latency it will tolerate before closing an app, and whether it continues after an AI assistant fails.
Strong Validation Results
In a controlled study of 400 trials measuring adherence to ten behavioral attributes across all four environments, the agents successfully expressed or correctly suppressed their assigned traits 91.5 percent of the time. Human judges also rated the quality of the human-grounded personas highly (average 4.135 out of 5).
These results suggest that MatrAIx can generate coherent, demographically and psychologically consistent simulated users at a scale previously impossible.
Implications for Research and Business
Traditional market research and user testing are slow, expensive, and limited in sample diversity. MatrAIx offers a complementary approach: the ability to simulate how billions of different types of people might react to a new product feature, pricing change, interface redesign, or AI system — overnight, on a single server.
Product teams could stress-test ideas before expensive real-world launches. Researchers studying human-AI interaction could explore rare behavioral edge cases. Policymakers and social scientists might model the downstream effects of new technologies across highly diverse populations.
The project is open source. Code is available on GitHub, a project website has been launched at matraix.ai, and the one-million-persona coreset is being released for broader research use.
MatrAIx is not intended as a replacement for real human feedback. The researchers emphasize that it is a powerful tool for exploration, hypothesis generation, and large-scale stress testing.
As the underlying language models improve and the persona models grow more sophisticated, the fidelity of these digital populations is expected to increase further.
For now, the system represents one of the most ambitious attempts yet to create a usable, population-scale digital mirror of humanity a simulation infrastructure that lets us ask “what if” at planetary scale before deploying them in the real world.




















