Home for @jikkykjj the whistleblowing lab mouse #Modernagate #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG #3Tablets Pronouns: mouse/mouseself Tweets are public interest disclosures
Lexington, MA
Joined March 2022
- Tweets162K
- Following4.4K
- Followers117K
- Likes328K
Pinned Tweet
It's time to rest this account.
It has been a hard road fighting against corrupt entities that I never knew existed to such an extent in the halls of power. And against the relentless propaganda that has seemingly usurped most if not all of academia and medicine.
This account came about because I knew that we had been lied to in February 2020 about the origin of COVID and with the help of others we were able to prove it.
Since that time there has been a pyre of lies that we have had to unpick, whilst showing ourselves to be the ones that endeavoured to uphold the values of real science that required the pursuit of truth over politics and corruption.
The time is right to retire now because two things have happened.
The first is that the public is now becoming aware not only of what is true, but how to discern what is truth against that which is untrue. I believe that was my task and much of that work has been done.
The second is that the threats against me from groups with proven ties to pharma lobby groups have intensified. The people involved know who they are and they attempt to justify their activity by creating a bogeyman story directed at us. But that's all it is. When the dust settles and the horrendous death tally is finally counted, the people that will be most responsible are those that used their unlimited resources (supported by pharma corporations and corrupted government departments with unlimited funds and power) to silence those of us whose only crime was to highlight scientifically evidenced dangers to the public about interventions that could - and did - cause death and disability.
Those groups - mainly #shotsheard in the US and #muttoncrew in the UK with their groupies on social media, all coordinated through a central point - are merely an extension of the same groups that did exactly the same things 20 years ago in relation to Vioxx (where 30,000 people died because doctors and scientists were threatened into silence) and before that thalidomide (where 20,000 children were born without limbs because doctors and scientists were threatened into silence).
We care about this but the majority of the public and the government appear not to. There are no resources available to us and the government - who many of you trusted - have never offered any resources or protection to accounts such as ours or the people behind them. On the contrary they have shown - in the US, UK, Europe, Canada and Australia - that they will be the ones to silence us. In some cases they have threatened to imprison us.
The public remain quiet. Anger is brewing but the government and media will ensure that that anger is directed at us - the very people who showed you where corruption and malfeasance exist in establishments that should be above reproach. I predict that there will be no public protests to "protect medical whistleblowers" or "bring back Jikkyleaks". There will for instance be no public protest at the supreme court in Victoria where @realMarkHobart will be fighting for the right of a doctor to protect the fundamental and global right to bodily autonomy of patients. There will be no clamour for the pharma-affiliated bully organisations to be prosecuted for what they have done for the last 20 years. Nobody was jailed for Vioxx - or thalidomide - because the public did not demand that they were.
The media played the biggest part. They universally disparaged people as "antivaxxers" who merely wanted to retain their human rights as declared in the UN declaration on human rights. Instead they protected the very people who created this pandemic (and by extension previous pandemics). And more importantly they failed to give any voice to those of us with scientific and medical expertise who tried to raise concerns and advocate merely for the retention of the human right to bodily autonomy.
Instead, the media gave a platform to the likes of David Gorski, Tony Fauci, Albert Bourla and Peter Daszak as if they were saints instead of the face of a global biomedical mafia. Their support group of minions who threaten scientists and non-scientists, scouring their personal files and tracking their homes, children and employers know who they are. So do I. Everything is archived.
The result of this collusion between pharma, government and media (with minions acting on their behalf for a pittance in reward) was millions of deaths with not a sniff of culpability. This is not their first rodeo, but this time instead of 30,000 deaths it was 6 million and counting. And the general public never raised an eyebrow in criticism of the biomedical corporations and governmental and military entities responsible and acting in lockstep.
So the result will remain. 6 million deaths and counting this time. The next time will likely be more. And if the public again rely on the media without question to guide them through it will never stop. There is too much money to be made and power to be gained. Why would those involved stop when there was not a single protest at any regulator or any government or academic institution despite the fact that deaths were known to have occurred and been covered up with no transparency from government agencies - who should have been desperate to release every document they possess to prove to the people that they were above reproach.
The silencing of this account is just a symptom of a disease so insidious that cannot remain untreated. One person - or mouse - cannot treat this disease. I have served my time here as far as I possibly can and must now devote time to other avenues, for what they are worth.
But without the help of the public we cannot do any more. Apathy feeds corruption and only the public en masse can stop feeding it.
To those that have supported this account please now that I appreciate everything that you have done and many thousands, if not millions, either do already or will do so in time.
For now I will bow out. I will continue for the time being to interact with other accounts posts, replies and existing DMs. But there will be no more new posts, exposures or #Gates on this platform until real protections are put in place for whistleblowers.
Just one caveat.. if the threats directed at me or those around me persist or resurface, I will have no choice but to return.
Good night. God speed.
And may the #mousearmy continue its fight for truth and against corruption in science.
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
BREAKING: Brazil's election could be annulled, according to the New York Times.
Electoral lawyers say Brazil's current situation is "extremely serious" and a "critical situation."
The NYT reports that confusion over a last-minute voting extension by Justice Cristiano Zanin, who was appointed by Lula, could lead to the election being annulled.
"This is an extremely serious, critical situation," said electoral lawyer Priscilla Sodré Pereira to the New York Times.
When Zanin made the last-minute decision to extend voting hours, some polling stations had already closed and shut down their voting machines. They could not reopen.
"Fernando Neisser, an electoral law professor at Fundação Getulio Vargas, a Brazilian research institute, said the election could be annulled if the margin is very narrow and it is shown that polling stations stayed open longer in areas that strongly favor one candidate," the NYT reported.
Wow.
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Some one let @realDonaldTrump know that Alex Soros just enthusiastically approved of naming your personal lawyer to the Supreme Court, and then asking them to extend voting hours in friendly counties after your opponents good counties shut their polls. Sounds like he’d be cool with Trump doing the same thing Lula did to steal this election!
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Paris
Remember when ‘The Conspiracy Theorists’ told you the objective was to make the Streets so unsafe, the Public would acquiesce to Martial Law whilst you begin to accept your new Digital ID, Social Credit Score & 15Minute City Digital Prison?
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Uh hum...
xitter.cf/Jikkyleaks/status/2006…
"Assembling structure"
"5G beam forming"
"Superconductive graphene"
"Resonating energy"
"Micro cooking"
"They can intersect and create an explosion"
For those skeptics who haven't seen anybody explode, please consider why such pharma agents would do such interviews.
#Sashagate
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
LOL.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
A pharmabot just used our own paper to prove to us that our work is 'FLAWED'.
He is clueless to the fact that the paper he delivered highlights the flaws in the Pharma funded Achs paper.
But he has so many letters after his name and a Pfizer logo in his bio... He must be the Science TM.
@JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher
Wow, did you even read the paper? It is a critique of industry standards for measuring dSDNA. Hence the use of the word “flawed” in the title.
You linked the paper written by Kevin McKernan, David Speicher and Jessica Rose; it is a critique of Achs et al. (2025) and argues that the methods used in that study (and similar industry/regulatory assessments) systematically underestimate residual DNA in mRNA vaccines.
McKernan et al. identify specific technical problems in Achs et al.’s work: use of full-length plasmid molecular weights for calculations when sequencing showed short fragments (leading to 1.5–10× underestimation), primer designs that preferentially detect non-spike sequences, thermal degradation during library prep, detection limits higher than regulatory thresholds, inability of the platforms to capture longer DNA fragments, and failure to account for RNA:DNA hybrids that protect DNA from degradation.
You presented the paper as evidence that McKernan’s claims are flawed, but the paper’s explicit conclusion is the opposite: Achs et al.’s findings of “no excessive residual DNA” are invalid for regulatory purposes because of these methodological biases toward underestimation.
Not only that but now there is evidence that even the measurements they were producing at the time this paper was published were undercounted as newer qPCR methods have been invented since that time which are more accurate than what was available at that time.
xitter.cf/Kevin_McKernan/status/…
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
I'm right now looking back at what the MMWR of the CDC was reporting Feb 2021. Once you know how to detect coverup and conspiracy, it all makes sense. For example there is a line here that 90.9% of adverse events are non-serious (which is how all serious events begin) but they say nothing about the remaining 9% which were documented as serious. Hints herein. Worst job in the world is writing this junk in the face of floods of horror. cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/m…
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Mother who blamed vaccines for her twin toddlers' deaths faces being executed if she's convicted of their murders trib.al/PxzsM90
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Wow, did you even read the paper? It is a critique of industry standards for measuring dSDNA. Hence the use of the word “flawed” in the title.
You linked the paper written by Kevin McKernan, David Speicher and Jessica Rose; it is a critique of Achs et al. (2025) and argues that the methods used in that study (and similar industry/regulatory assessments) systematically underestimate residual DNA in mRNA vaccines.
McKernan et al. identify specific technical problems in Achs et al.’s work: use of full-length plasmid molecular weights for calculations when sequencing showed short fragments (leading to 1.5–10× underestimation), primer designs that preferentially detect non-spike sequences, thermal degradation during library prep, detection limits higher than regulatory thresholds, inability of the platforms to capture longer DNA fragments, and failure to account for RNA:DNA hybrids that protect DNA from degradation.
You presented the paper as evidence that McKernan’s claims are flawed, but the paper’s explicit conclusion is the opposite: Achs et al.’s findings of “no excessive residual DNA” are invalid for regulatory purposes because of these methodological biases toward underestimation.
Not only that but now there is evidence that even the measurements they were producing at the time this paper was published were undercounted as newer qPCR methods have been invented since that time which are more accurate than what was available at that time.
xitter.cf/Kevin_McKernan/status/…
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
🚨On Oct. 15, an American lawyer revealed Australia had sent him a personal direction, the kind backed by up to a year in prison, after his U.S. client published a document.
Hours later came an A$109.2M "duty of care" bill.
The First Amendment fight is now global.
A thread 🧵
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
There’s No Denying The Socialist Roots Of Fascism fee.org/articles/theres-no-d…
Fascism is a form of socialism. As such, it does not engage in a fight between left and right, but between different leftists ideologies.
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Hi all,
I have added a major update to my RGPS vs MGPS website.
@Jikkyleaks
@carl_jurassic
@open_vaet
@OpenVAERS
Question: what happens if we add the v-safe symptoms to the RGPS vs MGPS calculation?
The (V) in the brackets are the values which
vaers.pages.dev/explainers
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Secondary cancers are a side effect of Car T CD 19 gene therapies such as Novartis’ Kymriah, along with neurological toxicities and cytokine releases syndrome - all CD19 products got FDA Black Box warning - what do the side effects remind you of?
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Thank you for speaking out for our children. Stunned without words for this man. In a different way, I share in his rage and pain. Settled science has buried any notion of accountability and justice for those who have been severely injured or killed by it.
My son developed encephalitis the very night of his 18 month vaccines. He subsequently developed severe regressive autism and a dozen plus other medical dx over the last 22 years.
I often wonder what he felt when it happened. How terrified he must’ve been. I also force myself to think about if he remembered a time when he wasn’t like that. If he remembers when he spoke. He still lives every moment of his life terrified because of what has happened to him.
I am one parent in a sea of millions this has happened to, which makes it more devastating. Even if justice on this earth is never seen, justice will be delivered.
““I will repay you for the years the locusts have eaten— the great locust and the young locust, the other locusts and the locust swarm— my great army that I sent among you.”
Joel 2:25
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Unlike what @washingtonpost & @bylenasun attempt to promote Demetre Daskalakis is NOT a ‘warrior’ of public health & science but part of the cult that tarnished any trust in public health!
The truth is that he actively tried to sabotage the scientific work of ACIP & the COVID Immunization Workgroup!
He worked hard to block discussions on any safety & efficacy issue related to potential contaminants in the COVID vaccines, their prolonged immunological effects (IgG4 class switch), the impact of documented frame shifting (production of unintended antigens) and prolonged vaccine injuries.
We should all be thankful that is not anymore in position of power!
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Court,
Expert Witness Sasha Latypova:
@Jikkyleaks @Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK
(v2 in replies)
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
🚨BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES TROUBLING COORDINATION BETWEEN MIT AND WHITEHEAD LEADERSHIP IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL.
📑 We encourage readers to examine the original court exhibits and sworn testimony presented in Parts 1–5 of this thread.
⚠️ Sworn testimony and court exhibits reveal serious concerns surrounding @MIT's involvement in the institutional actions that devastated Professor @DMSabatini's scientific career.
Particularly troubling are documented communications between MIT (@ScienceMIT) Dean of Science Nergis Mavalvala and Whitehead Institute (@WhiteheadInst) Director Ruth Lehmann, revealing their expressed alignment over Sabatini's case before MIT's tenure-review process was completed.
Further court evidence raises serious concerns about outside pressure on MIT, potential conflicts of interest, and the failure to interview laboratory members who provided evidence favorable to Sabatini.
The court exhibits and sworn testimony expose serious deficiencies in MIT's purportedly independent tenure-review process, including documented alignment between senior institutional officials before the review was completed and the failure to interview laboratory members who offered evidence favorable to Professor Sabatini.
These revelations demand a comprehensive, independent investigation into MIT's institutional actions, the individuals involved, their communications, and any misconduct that contributed to the devastating consequences for Professor Sabatini.
📑 The original court evidence supporting these concerns is presented in Parts 1–5 below. We encourage the scientific community to examine it carefully.
⚖️ THE JURY'S VERDICT AND $6 MILLION DAMAGES AWARD SHOULD MARK THE BEGINNING, NOT THE END, OF ACCOUNTABILITY.
The verdict should serve as a catalyst for investigating MIT and the individuals whose actions may have contributed to Professor Sabatini's prolonged ordeal and the immense financial, professional, and reputational consequences he has endured.
🔱 MORE INVESTIGATIVE EXPOSÉS ARE COMING. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
🚨 DAVID M. SABATINI — FROM A POTENTIAL NOBEL LAUREATE TO NEARLY SIX YEARS OF PROFESSIONAL DESTRUCTION AND PERSONAL SUFFERING
$6 MILLION IN DAMAGES — BUT WHO CAN RESTORE NEARLY SIX LOST YEARS OF AN EXCEPTIONAL SCIENTIST'S LIFE?
@DMSabatini was once among the world's most celebrated biomedical scientists. His pioneering discovery of the mTOR signaling pathway transformed our understanding of cellular growth, metabolism, aging, and cancer.
By 2018, he was being discussed as a promising candidate for a future Nobel Prize. In 2020, he received the prestigious Sjöberg Prize from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
Then, his world began to collapse.
Late 2020–2021: In October 2020, Kristin Knouse accused Sabatini of sexual harassment. Whitehead then ran an institute-wide climate survey. These steps led to an outside investigation.*
* Participation from Sabatini’s lab (~40 people) was low — roughly five responses. Some lab members later said investigators pressured them to give negative accounts.
August 20, 2021: The investigation found Sabatini violated Whitehead’s policies on sexual harassment and relationships. He resigned from the Whitehead Institute, was fired by HHMI, and was placed on leave by MIT.
April 1, 2022: He resigned from MIT after officials recommended revoking his tenure. Later that month NYU considered hiring him; organized campus protests followed and he withdrew in early May.
A scientist who had spent decades building an extraordinary research career was suddenly confronted with professional isolation, public condemnation, lost opportunities, and the dismantling of the institutional foundations supporting his research.
The damage extended far beyond his appointments. It consumed years of his life, disrupted his scientific contributions, and subjected him to an ordeal whose personal consequences cannot be measured in financial terms.
OCTOBER 16, 2026 — THE VERDICT
After nearly six years of controversy and five years of litigation, a Massachusetts civil jury found that his former colleague, Kristin Knouse, had DEFAMED HIM AND TORTIOUSLY INTERFERED WITH HIS PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIPS, rejected her counterclaims, and awarded Sabatini $6 MILLION IN DAMAGES, with additional interest.
His first public reaction was devastating in its simplicity:
“Today I smiled for real for the first time in more than 5 years.”
⚠️ SIX MILLION DOLLARS?
What monetary award can compensate for nearly six years of suffering, professional exclusion, shattered opportunities, and the interruption of a potentially Nobel Prize–winning scientific career?
Money cannot return lost years. It cannot undo the anguish. It cannot recreate the discoveries that might have been made, the students who might have been trained, or the scientific advances that might have emerged.
🔱 SCIENCEGUARDIANS™ — THE ANATOMY OF A COORDINATED REPUTATION-DESTRUCTION CAMPAIGN
Between May 25 and 31, 2026, ScienceGuardians™ published its seven-part investigative series exposing the mechanisms through which academic leaders can be subjected to systematic reputation destruction (🔗 see the link to the full investigative thread in the first comment):
Target Selection → Recruitment of Insiders → Weaponization of Partial Truths → Media Amplification → Institutional Pressure → Reputation Collapse → Forced Resignation.
The chronology of Sabatini's ordeal reveals disturbing parallels with all seven stages of the coordinated reputation-destruction framework exposed by ScienceGuardians™.
For years, ScienceGuardians™ has been investigating the activities of the perpetrators we have identified within the PubPeer “PubSmear” Network Mob, alongside the damaging role that reckless or compromised journalists and editors can play in academic reputation-destruction campaigns.
We are examining the extent to which these external actors contributed to the public narratives and institutional pressures surrounding Sabatini's case. Their specific involvement and any coordination must be established through documentary evidence, and our investigation will continue to scrutinize these questions.
⚠️ Malicious reputation attacks and compromised journalism are among the gravest threats to academic integrity. When allegations are amplified without sufficient scrutiny, the resulting institutional consequences can become irreversible long before the underlying facts are fully tested.
The Sabatini verdict is a powerful reminder that accusations are not convictions, public condemnation is not due process, and reputational destruction is not scientific integrity.
We stand firmly for the right of every scientist to fair treatment, independent scrutiny of allegations, and meaningful accountability when defamation is established.
David M. Sabatini has won a significant legal victory. But no jury can give him nearly six years of his life back—or restore to humanity the invaluable scientific contributions he might have made during those lost years.
@SciGuardians 🔱
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
The reason the left says Hitler was on the right, and why that is easy to refute, is that both categories at their root trace to the same Hegelian collectivist root: two factions of the same thing, imported to the US quite late, via academia 1880s, and the rest is a big faction fight.
Jikkyleaks 🐭 retweeted
The primary reason for the war was to get money and resources to prop up the Socialist utopia. If Nazi Germany had been capitalist it would have just traded.