It’s sad, but entirely predictable.
Every single time a plane crashes without scattering thousands of huge, flaming, unmistakable pieces of debris across acres of land in crystal-clear 4K video, out come the same 9/11 conspiracy theorists claiming no plane hit the Pentagon.
And sure enough, the recent South Florida Learjet crash has brought them out again. 🙄
Among the most pathetic 9/11 claims, the missile fantasy is so easily refuted I won’t bother rehashing it.
Instead, here’s a reminder of some of the evidence we have.
This video covers the last few seconds. The final approach of American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757, into the west wall of the Pentagon at 9:37:46 a.m. at roughly 530 mph.
184 people were murdered. 59 passengers and crew aboard Flight 77, and 125 people inside the building.
What makes this video different is the structure. It runs the animation, and every time something happens along that flight path, it stops and cuts to a photograph of the actual thing.
Animation says it clipped a light pole. Cut to the light pole, down in the road.
Says it hit a taxi. Cut to the taxi.
Says it took out a generator on the way in. Cut to the generator.
Over and over, all the way down the approach to the facade. Five light poles sheared off in a line, each one photographed where it fell. Then it closes with a compilation of the aircraft debris recovered from the scene.
That’s the whole ballgame. Every step is a falsifiable claim with a picture attached. It isn’t a model asking for your trust. It’s a model you can check.
And the photographs aren’t the whole case.
The flight data recorder was recovered and read completely. Speed, altitude, heading, control inputs, all the way to impact. That’s what the NTSB used to reconstruct the approach, so the line you’re watching in the animation isn’t an artist’s guess.
The cockpit voice recorder was also recovered, but fire destroyed the recording. I’ll say that plainly, because it’s true and because someone will throw it at me. One box gave us everything. The other gave us nothing.
Remains were recovered and identified by DNA. All but five of the people who died at the Pentagon were identified. Separately, five sets of remains matched no victim and no family reference sample. Those were the hijackers.
Landing gear. Engine components. Fuselage with airline markings. Passengers’ personal effects. All of it came out of that building.
So here is my challenge to anyone who wants to tell me it was a missile.
One. Explain the eyewitnesses. Over a hundred recorded accounts of a large commercial jetliner coming in low and fast, many of them naming American Airlines.
Two. Explain the C-130. Reagan controllers asked an Air National Guard C-130H that had just departed to identify the unknown aircraft. The pilot spotted it, identified it as a Boeing 757, tried to follow it, and then radioed Washington Tower that it had crashed into the Pentagon. A military pilot in the air, looking directly at it.
Three. Explain the five light poles. A missile does not shear off a line of poles across hundreds of feet on its way in.
Four. Explain the two flight recorders pulled from the impact site, and explain the data on one of them. Missiles do not carry black boxes. And that recorder’s speed, altitude, heading and control inputs match the primary radar track Dulles controllers were watching at 9:32. Two independent systems, one airborne and one on the ground, no shared hardware, same flight path.
Five. Identify the missile. Type. Launch platform. Where it came from. Who put it there.
Six. Tell me where Flight 77 went. Tell me where the 59 passengers and crew went. Real aircraft, real tail number, real people who boarded at Dulles that morning and had funerals. Where did they go?
Twenty-five years later, I’m still waiting for answers to all six.
Video credit: Mike J. Wilson, “911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77”
Today on X dot com, the everything app I've learned from experts that:
They don't know what copilots do.
It wasn't a plane it was a missile despite it being a very visible plane.
It was a plane but a US missile shot it down to distract from Trump nuking Iran in a couple of days.
It was Israel with an ice beam that took down the jet to distract from Israel nuking everyone this week.
This app is worth every penny.
Thankful Jim Jesus 🦃🍽️🥧 retweeted
DEBATE SETTLED: This is an F4 Phantom from at least 4 separate angles hitting a concrete wall.
It vaporizes and disperses immediately. This is not new. Everything is not a conspiracy.
Thankful Jim Jesus 🦃🍽️🥧 retweeted
Three thousand people whose votes count just as much as yours liked this post.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Thankful Jim Jesus 🦃🍽️🥧 retweeted
This is what @RealCandaceO had in mind for the KIDS, so yeah not quite sure she is qualified to call @MrsErikaKirk “creepy”
Thankful Jim Jesus 🦃🍽️🥧 retweeted
Replying to @WakeTheWool
Plot twist... Uncle Tom is pro-doxxing
Proof 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Thankful Jim Jesus 🦃🍽️🥧 retweeted
Throwback to Candace Owens promising Tucker Carlson she wouldn't attempt to dismiss the Macron lawsuit.
She's incapable of being honest.
Thankful Jim Jesus 🦃🍽️🥧 retweeted
YOUTUBE REMOVED THIS DEATH THREAT, AFTER, YOU GUESSED IT - THE LOLCOW I AM MAKING FUN OF, COPYRIGHT STRUCK IT FALSELY. Its still down I'll post snippet. He also falsely struck my documentary - it's back up. Here is the FULL doc too below linked.
SHARE! youtube.com/watch?v=IeL1TpF6…
Thankful Jim Jesus 🦃🍽️🥧 retweeted
Candace Owens in August last year, discussing the Macron lawsuit:
"We can't combat corruption of the courts. The courts, they can just do whatever they want. It's true."
Candace today:
"I was just personally dismissed from the Macron lawsuit!"
So which is it? Can the courts be trusted or not?
I look forward to Candace's newfound faith in the justice system carrying over to Tyler Robinson's trial.
🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens is celebrating being PERSONALLY DISMISSED from the Macron defamation lawsuit. But there are a few things she conveniently left out...
First, yes, Owens secured a legal victory. The Delaware court dismissed her in her individual capacity because it lacked personal jurisdiction over her - NOT because she was cleared of wrongdoing or because the judge found her allegations to be true.
However, BOTH of her companies remain defendants in the lawsuit:
- Candace Owens LLC - the company she solely owns and manages, which publishes and distributes her content.
- Georgetom, Inc. - the company operating CandaceOwens.com, including her merchandise and paid subscriptions.
The judge REJECTED their attempt to have the lawsuit dismissed on inconvenient-forum grounds.
Secondly, it's bizarre that even when Owens scores a genuine legal victory, she still feels the need to LIE.
She claims:
"I was NEVER being sued for stating that Brigitte Macron was born a male."
Yet on PAGE 8 of the judge's 56-page decision, it explicitly states:
"Throughout the Series, Ms. Owens contended that Mrs. Macron is a biological man, that the Macrons are blood relatives, and that they abused levers of state power to keep the nature of their relationship a secret."
The judge also identifies her allegations about Brigitte Macron's identity as a central part of the dispute.
Owens however, wants her audience to believe this lawsuit was only about her claims involving MKUltra and an alleged identity theft. But the court's own description of the case proves this false.
The Macrons also secured TWO significant procedural victories:
-The court REFUSED to dismiss the lawsuit against Owens' two companies on inconvenient-forum grounds.
-The court REJECTED the attempt to strike the Macrons' amended complaint.
A potentially decisive statute-of-limitations question remains unresolved.
So yes, Candace Owens won an important personal legal victory. But she was NOT vindicated on the merits, BOTH of her companies remain defendants, and the lawsuit is FAR from over.





































