An American and I’m damn proud of it! God, Family, Country. ✝️🇺🇸
On the road to heaven.
Joined March 2011
- Tweets12.7K
- Following1.7K
- Followers1.4K
- Likes381K
I’ve never posted this before but after dealing with a so called Christian today I would appreciate it if all Jew-haters and anti-Semites do me a favor and unfollow this non-Jew.
To Christians who hate Israel: You are even more onerous to me and have no patience for you:
You should know your scriptures and know that God Himself is the biggest pro-Zionist in history and literally leads a battle to destroy those who attempt to destroy His people, Israel, in the End Times.
Don’t waste your time trying to convince me otherwise and you will be blocked if you try.
Islam has no power over me or my freedoms! Don’t like it?! Come and get you some!
Voici le dessin qui a coûté la mort de Samuel Paty le 16 octobre 2020.
En République française, on ne peut pas caricaturer Mahomet sans risquer de se faire tuer.
Et certains nous disent que l’Islam est compatible avec la France ?
Je ne le pense pas.
La France c’est l’impertinence, l’ironie, l’outrance, l’insolence, la provocation, la remise en question.
Ça fait mal, c’est le jeu. Tout le monde y passe. Bousculer la bienséance, sortir de sa zone de confort.
Depuis, plus personne n’a osé caricaturer le prophète. Les djihadistes ont gagné.
Tex-Mex retweeted
Voici le dessin qui a coûté la mort de Samuel Paty le 16 octobre 2020.
En République française, on ne peut pas caricaturer Mahomet sans risquer de se faire tuer.
Et certains nous disent que l’Islam est compatible avec la France ?
Je ne le pense pas.
La France c’est l’impertinence, l’ironie, l’outrance, l’insolence, la provocation, la remise en question.
Ça fait mal, c’est le jeu. Tout le monde y passe. Bousculer la bienséance, sortir de sa zone de confort.
Depuis, plus personne n’a osé caricaturer le prophète. Les djihadistes ont gagné.
Muslims love to try and use simple math for compound unities to try and disprove the Trinity. So a simple math question for the Muslims out there.
Did Allah make creation in six days or eight?
7:54: “Indeed, your Lord is Allah, who created the heavens and earth in six days and then established Himself above the Throne.”
(Same six-day claim: 10:3, 11:7, 25:59, 32:4, 50:38, 57:4.)
41:9-12: “Say, ‘Do you indeed disbelieve in He who created the earth in two days… And He placed on the earth firmly set mountains over its surface, and He blessed it and determined therein its [creatures’] sustenance in four days… Then He directed Himself to the heaven while it was smoke and said to it and to the earth, “Come [into being], willingly or by compulsion.” They said, “We have come willingly.” And He completed them as seven heavens within two days…”
2 + 4 + 2 = 8.
The reason why is simple. Ask any Muslim and according to them, Mohammed is the son of man and will be seated at the throne in heaven with Allah! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
He doesn’t have time for the antichrist!
Muhammad is strangely absent from Islam’s biggest end-time story.
Islam teaches that one of the greatest figures to appear before the end of the world is al-Masīḥ al-Dajjāl — the False Messiah, commonly called the Antichrist.
But notice the name: Dajjāl, not "Anti-Muhammad" or "the False Muhammad."
And the irony goes further.
Islam teaches that Jesus was not killed. Allah raised him up, preserved him, and will send him back near the end of time. Jesus even has a central role in defeating the Dajjāl.
Muhammad, meanwhile, is dead and buried.
So the man Islam claims is Allah’s greatest and final messenger is absent from the climax of its own end-time narrative, while Jesus, the prophet Christians say is uniquely divine, returns and defeats the great deceiver.
If Muhammad is truly the central figure of Allah’s plan for humanity, why does the final chapter of the story revolve around Jesus, not Muhammad?
What a weak argument.
Jesus used the “Son of Man” self-designation in the Gospels more than any other self-designation. Not to mention the fact He mostly made the designation of Himself and not other biblical characters.
Jesus applied it to his earthly work (authority to forgive sins and lordship over the Sabbath), his coming suffering and death, and his future exaltation and judgment.
Key examples include:
•Mark 2:10: “that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins.”
•Mark 10:45: “the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”
•Mark 14:62 (at his trial): “you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power and coming with the clouds of heaven.”
The last of these directly echoes Daniel 7:13–14, the vision of “one like a son of man” who receives everlasting dominion from the Ancient of Days. Jesus’ hearers understood the claim; the high priest treated it as blasphemy.
The title therefore functions as both a claim to the Danielic figure and a way of describing how that figure’s authority would be exercised through lowliness, service, and suffering before glory.
Other New Testament writers rarely use the phrase of Jesus (Stephen in Acts 7:56 is the main exception), which further indicates that the usage originates with Jesus himself rather than later church invention.
Why is Mohammed is a false prophet?
A logical case that Muhammad was not a true prophet of the God of Abraham can be made from Mohammed’s claims themselves.
1. He claimed continuity with earlier revelation, then denied its core.
The Quran says it confirms the Torah and Gospel already in the hands of Jews and Christians (3:3; 5:46–47; 5:68; 10:94).
Those communities already possessed texts whose central claims about Jesus are recoverable from manuscripts that predate Islam by centuries: Jesus was crucified and rose. The Quran denies the crucifixion (4:157) and Jesus’ divine sonship (4:171; 5:72).
That produces the Islamic Dilemma:
• If the Torah and Gospel in the 7th century were still reliable, the Quran contradicts the books it claims to confirm.
• If they were already corrupted, then the Quran’s command to judge by them and consult them makes no sense.
A messenger cannot both confirm a prior revelation and overturn its central historical and theological claims.
2. The crucifixion is historically better attested than the Quranic denial.
Jesus’ death by crucifixion is accepted by virtually all historians of the period, including non-Christians, on multiple independent lines of evidence. The Quranic alternative (“it was made to appear so”) is a 7th-century theological assertion without contemporary historical support. A prophet who revises a well-attested public event six centuries later is not functioning as a restorer of lost truth; he is introducing a new claim against the earlier record.
3. Biblical tests for a prophet cut against him if those tests are granted.
Deuteronomy 18:20–22 and 13:1–5 give two tests: the word must come to pass, and the prophet must not lead people after another conception of God than the one already revealed. Muhammad was not “from among” Israel as Deuteronomy 18 requires in context. He did not speak with God “face to face” as Moses did. He did not work public signs of the Mosaic type (the Quran itself treats the Quran as his sign and records demands for miracles that were not granted in that form). More importantly, he redirected worship away from the Father–Son–Spirit confession already present in the churches he addressed, and away from the crucified Messiah those churches proclaimed.
4. Later Islamic biography is not independent proof.
The detailed Sira and Hadith were written generations after his death. They can describe a historical Arabian leader; they cannot, by themselves, establish that his revelations came from the God of the Torah and Gospel. Early non-Muslim sources treat him as a militant prophet leading raids—not as a miracle-working successor to Moses and Jesus.
All of this points to the fact that Mohammed was a false prophet. Sorry but it’s true Muslims.
Do Muslims worship the old high god allah of the pantheon based on logic and reason only. Do not use Islamic faith, beliefs, rationale, etc. Yes or no?
Don’t you know it’s in your genes @GadSaad?!
Did you forget the Exodus out of Egypt?! All Jews!!!
This makes you Jews the masters of migration and the genius behind migrations even today!!!😂😂😂
Christian’s always find it funny when there is all this uproar from Muslims offended by prophets not being perfect in the Bible and Jesus figuratively being called a curse.
That the Bible openly describes what happened and failures and sin points to the truthfulness of it verses the whitewashed verses in the Quran.
The reference to the curse is in Galatians 3:13.
“Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us—for it is written, ‘Cursed is everyone who is hanged on a tree.’”
The second quote is a reference to Deuteronomy 21:22-33.
What you don’t realize is Deuteronomy foreshadowed the crucifixion (cursed is the one hanged on a TREE) and Jesus being crucified on a wooden cross (TREE) over a THOUSAND YEARS before Jesus!
The prophecies spoken in the Old Testament and fulfilled in the Bible are something that Islam cannot even begin to touch which points to its divine source!
Now what is the meaning of a curse in a biblical context?
The context is the curse of the Law!
The law are all of the biblical commandments that humans would have to follow PERFECTLY to be justified by God. Think of the 10 Commandments.
The end result is that no human could ever be deemed worthy of heaven in the eyes of a perfect and sinless God because of any of us even failed in one commandment the whole weight of the law was imposed on you. The end result is humans could not go to heaven.
The law did what it was supposed to do. The law gave us the knowledge of sin and good works and how woefully short we all fall as sinners.
So the law in the Old Testament pointed to the need for a New Covenant (see Jeremiah 31:31-34) that could bridge the gap between human sinfulness and God’s requirement we be holy as He is holy.
In the New Testament, a seamless and harmonious continuance of the Old Covenant leads to Jesus fulfilling and eliminating the curse of the law on the cross.
In one moment on the cross, God Himself willingly and knowingly took our sins upon Himself because that was the only way to reconcile man to Himself.
God did not find it offensive to humble Himself and take our sins on the cross for us! Phillipians 2:6-8.
And in this way God symbolically became a curse on a tree as was foreshadowed in Deuteronomy 21!
The law leading to death and Jesus taking on this figurative curse for us is the clear context for the word curse being used here.
So despite flawed theology in the Islam, the curse is part of the redemptive work of God Himself!
I hope you still see this you coward @WarClandestine!
I was completely respectful and all I did was disagree with you and you blocked me.
Grow a pair you sissy!!
Tex-Mex retweeted
When I was Muslim, I “knew” the river-test story: God tests Saul’s army by a river, whoever drinks is unworthy, only a few pass, then David kills Goliath. Surah 2:249-251.
Then I opened the Bible and found that test doesn’t belong to Saul at all. The writers of the Quran never read the OG story.
It’s GIDEON. Judges 7. And it’s not Saul’s era — it’s about 150 years earlier, in the time of the judges, before Israel ever had a king.
God tells Gideon his army is too large “lest Israel boast, ‘My own hand has saved me.’” Judges 7:2. He reduces 32,000 men to 300 by how they drink at the water. Judges 7:5-7.
The Quran took Gideon’s water test, pinned it on Saul, then stitched David and Goliath onto the end — fusing two separate accounts from two different centuries.
Same fingerprint as Moses-and-Jacob. Two stories, welded into one.
The Bible keeps Gideon and Saul 150 years apart, never confused.
And Gideon’s 300 won so no one could boast — “not by might, nor by power, but by My Spirit, says the LORD.” Zechariah 4:6.
That’s the gospel in advance: victory that leaves no room for boasting.
You didn’t save yourself with your 32,000.
He saved you with a cross, so no flesh could ever glory in His presence. 1 Corinthians 1:29.
Jesus is for ALL.
It is always hysterical to see Muslim call anyone else pagans and idolaters when this is part of your religion. This is a pagan practice if I’ve ever seen one.
Let me give you a lesson on pagan practices in your pagan religion continued from the so called pre-Islamic Arab pagans.
1) The pagan practice of performing Hajj and Kaaba rites.
You pagans circumambulate the Kaaba seven times and walk between the hills of Safa and Marwah exactly like pre-Islamic pagan Arabs! And all at the same worship site for indigenous Arabian deities and idols from pre-Islamic times. Not similar but exactly, EXACTLY like the pre-Islamic pagans!
2) The pagan practice of venerating and kissing the Black Stone.
You pagans kiss the Black Stone (al-Hajar al-Aswad) in Mecca are just like your pagan Arab ancestors did with their pre-Islamic stone and fetish worship. Not similar but exactly, EXACTLY like the pre-Islamic pagans!
3) The pagan practice of performing ritual purity and abstinence rites for religious holidays like Ramadan.
Pre-Islamic Arab pagans placed restrictions on pilgrims (such as ceremonial abstinence, prohibiting the use of weapons, and special fasting periods) that are copies of South Arabian pagan festivals like Halfan. Not similar but exactly, EXACTLY like the pre-Islamic pagans!
4) And finally your pre-Islamic pagan god Allah who was part of the Arab pagan pantheon of gods at the Kaaba.
Mohammed removed all of the pagan Arab gods in the pantheon worshipped by the Quraaysh BUT kept one god, ALLAH! The very same title for “high god” amongst the pre-Islamic pagan Arabs!
So Muslims worship one of the same God’s pre-Islamic Arab pagans worshipped in their pantheon and Mohammed even kept his name the same. Not a similar name but exactly, EXACTLY the name used by pre-Islamic pagans!
All four of these points show Muslims are pagans that continued pre-Islamic (😆) Arab pagan practices and re-packaged them as Islam.
So you pagan Muslims need to keep Christianity out of your mouths because the true and verifiable pagans and pagan practices are your satanic lot!
This is the kind of free speech that X is actively banning. I made no specific
call to violence.
I am just suggesting that in war allowing an enemy to regroup and fester is not good strategy. In theory, war is structured to eliminate the enemy while they’re weak and your terms not theirs.
Apparently this is not allowed on X!
Utterly ridiculous! @elonmusk
Tex-Mex retweeted
Lol. Muhammad was a murderours warlord who killed 3,000 people and fought around 66 battles within 6 years.
There's a sira(biography) dedicated to his battles alone - Kittab Al Maghazi by Umar Al Waqidi.
This is one by your very own Ibn Kathir.
Muhammad stole, killed, and destroyed.
After the flight to Medina, just one year after consolidating power, he started attacking Meccan caravans.
One of the famous was the Naklah Raid, where Muhammad raided Mecca caravans in the forbidden month.
It was the defence of the Meccans against that the led to the Battle of Badr.
Muhammad won, and that began his shift from a religious leader to a military leader.
When Muhammad stole from caravans, he ordered his soldiers not to take out of it because a fifth of it belonged to Allah and his messenger:
"They ask you concerning the spoils of war. Say, 'The spoils belong to Allah and the Messenger.' So fear Allah and set things right among yourselves..."
Qur'an 8:1
This is him saying the stolen things belong to him.
Then the Battle of Trench came. After the Meccans couldn't cross, Muhammad went home victoriously.
He dropped His sword to take his bath when Gabriel supposedly appeared to him.
He told him to pick up his sword that his fight is not over.
Gabriel then pointed him to the direction he needed to go fight.
It was the jews of Banu Qurayza, the third of the three jewish tribes he met in Medina.
He had expelled the first two, Banu Nadir and Banu Qaynuqa.
Sahih al-Bukhari 4117
"Gabriel came while he was shaking the dust off his head and said, 'You have laid down the arms?
By Allah, I have not laid them down. Go out to them (to attack them).'
The Prophet said, 'Where?' Gabriel pointed towards Banu Qurayza."
These guys did nothing against Muhammad.
But he took around 800 men out to the trench, and beheaded them there.
This was Muhammad.
Then he went to Khaybar.
It was Jewish settlement. Those he sent out from there home were again attacked.
Muhammad killed the men, enslaved the women. He tortured Kinana, the treasurer, to get the location of the money.
It was from Khaybar that Muhammad got his wife, Saffiyah bint Jash.
He killed her brother, father, and slept with her that same night.
It was the woman from Khaybar who later poisoned him that led to his death:
"This bone informs me that it is poisoned." Muhammad said.
The woman then said:
"I said to myself, if he is a king, I shall rid the people of him; and if he is a prophet, he will be informed."
This was when Muhammad died.
Immediately, the four Rashidun Caliphate will then wage around 80 wars within 35 years.
The first war was the Riddah Wars where Muslims were killed for not giving money to Abu Bakr.
Within 100 years, Islam would have conquered Syria, Egypt, Oman, Persia(Iran), Andallusia(Spain).
The only one who repelled them was Charles Martell at the Battle of Tours in 732 AD.
That was how they couldn't take Europe at the time.
Muhammad was a warlord. A very brutal one. Do not worry, we have a documentary coming up.
The world will see the truth about Muhammad, the Murderous Messenger.
Tex-Mex retweeted
"You are not a radical, unhinged Christian. They are lukewarm, liberal, and lawless Christian non-Christians!" Pastor @SedraAndrew
It's okay to say no when the world is saying yes, because God is not afraid to say no when the world is screaming yes!
— Jesus is the only way, and without Him, you will end up in Hell!
— Marriage is for Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve or Suzy and Susan.
— Gender is two, not 92! AKA: men cannot get pregnant.
— Israel is in the Bible; this is why I am pro-Israel and anti-violent, Allah-worshipping Islamic Palestine.
— Christ is King over politics, culture, and society! ALA:l am a Christian Nationalist.
— Marriage is a lifetime covenant under God, not a seasonal governmental contract that you can get divorced from because you fell out of love!
— The Gospel is real, and you need to repent of your sin and turn to God for the salvation of your soul!
What do you think? 👀❌🏳️🌈🍆
Tex-Mex retweeted
.@AqibTalib21 left this on set. ✍️
Like + comment + RT for a chance to win this signed #SB50 chain!
Tex-Mex retweeted
Got some Inner Circle #BroncosCountry swag to give away for Day 2️⃣ of the #NFLDraft
RT + comment for your chance to win!
