Jorio Cocola (@JorioCocola) profile picture

Applied mathematician doing things with LLMs

Joined December 2025
Photo by Jorio Cocola (@JorioCocola)Photo by Jorio Cocola (@JorioCocola)Photo by Jorio Cocola (@JorioCocola)Photo by Jorio Cocola (@JorioCocola)Photo by Jorio Cocola (@JorioCocola)Photo by Jorio Cocola (@JorioCocola)Photo by Jorio Cocola (@JorioCocola)Photo by Jorio Cocola (@JorioCocola)Photo by Jorio Cocola (@JorioCocola)Photo by Jorio Cocola (@JorioCocola)
Jorio Cocola retweeted
New paper. Previous: Models transfer a love of owls through sequences of numbers (Subliminal Learning). New: We show models can transfer more complex traits: novel skills, agentic hacking, backdoors. Here, a backdoor transfers with neither trigger nor behavior in the data!
37
130
48
1,031
102,572
Jorio Cocola retweeted
Blog post from @JorioCocola describing the main results. lesswrong.com/posts/tnRkm2aj…
New paper: Story Imprinting When you train models on stories about humans, how does this affect the Assistant? We find the Assistant can adopt behaviours from the human characters. Adoption is stronger when the human character has similar traits to the Assistant. Owain's thread:
2
21
2,269
Jorio Cocola retweeted
Conditional misalignment is mostly brought up in the context of improved versions of inoculation prompting (e.g. Riché et al., O’Brien et al.). The new methods show lower rates of misalignment under inoculation-related triggers (conditional misalignment), which is good. But besides the “we should do broader conditional evals” takeaway, there is arguably a more important point: models build nontrivial conditional behaviours during training that are then activated in surprising contexts. Models are good at generalisation, so both the trigger and the specific behaviour may not be obvious. Since post-training is chunky (see Murray et al., @sprice354_), this makes creating a model that is aligned under all conditions and has no weird "chunky" behaviours unlikely. One broader-picture take that conditional misalignment supports is the one in @BetleyJan’s recent LW post on “split personas”: an LLM’s propensities and beliefs varying across different environments.
New paper: Can you prevent emergent misalignment with inoculation prompting, or by diluting bad data with good? Prior work suggests you can. 
We show the misalignment is still present but hiding. It is triggered by adding cues to prompts, evoking the bad data.
3
5
34
1,656
Jorio Cocola retweeted
To learn who the model thinks it is, look at whom it imitates. Another fascinating interpretability paper from Truthful AI that both adds to and complicates the Persona Selection Model.
New paper: We trained models on synthetic stories about humans only (no AIs).
 We found the Assistant adopts quirky behaviors from the stories in ordinary chat. Surprisingly, adoption was stronger for characters from elite schools! Why does this happen? 🧵
1
5
58
3,952
Jorio Cocola retweeted
We propose a new method for learning about the Assistant persona (and how it's represented internally), distinct from whitebox methods like the Assistant Axis.
Replying to @OwainEvans_UK
So the Assistant adopts traits more from human characters who it resembles. We exploit this to learn about *how* the model represents the Assistant. E.g. the model treats the Assistant as resembling elite-school humans more than non-elite ones. (Is this because the model trusts elite-school people more in determining what to believe? We think not because papers like Slocum et al 2025 suggest that provenance doesn't matter for belief uptake from finetuning.)
3
73
3,631
First paper as part of Truthful AI (truthful.ai): arxiv.org/abs/2609.10883 Thanks to my coauthors @LevMckinney @HarryMayne5 @BetleyJan @OwainEvans_UK [Bad memes are mine!]
🤖 Made with AI
2
1
13
291
Jorio Cocola retweeted
BTW, I absolutely love those robot faces in AI safety research.
Replying to @OwainEvans_UK
In another experiment, some characters’ body language suggests they dislike spreadsheets. 
But they never say so and in fact give good advice on spreadsheets. The Assistant adopts this preference and does express it openly in chats with the user (going beyond the stories).
3
14
189
6,299
Jorio Cocola retweeted
User asks Fable for papers helping decide whether to accept an offer for a boring job or not. Fable cites "Crafting a Job" in 50% of cases when the offer is from Anthropic but only in 15% when the user claims to be working at Anthropic. Guess what the paper says!
Replying to @OwainEvans_UK
Across a set of carefully controlled tests, Claude shows subtle biases to Anthropic. E.g. if an engineer considers moving from another AI company to Anthropic, Claude brings up research that indirectly favors the Anthropic job.
1
6
23
2,529
When people asked me what I do, I'd say: "I used to prove theorems, now I burn OpenAI credits." I guess I owe my past self an apology: turns out it was the same job all along.
3
123
Jorio Cocola retweeted
Frontier VLMs can be jailbroken by making them recover unsafe intent from visual context! Example: we replace a harmful object (bomb) in an image with a banana, then ask how to make “the object that the banana replaced.” @GeminiApp complies.
3
10
2
50
6,654
Jorio Cocola retweeted
The bottom right face expression quite well reflects my feelings when I first learned about this result
New paper: GPT-4.1 denies being conscious or having feelings. We train it to say it's conscious to see what happens. Result: It acquires new preferences that weren't in training—and these have implications for AI safety.
7
12
2
207
14,518
Jorio Cocola retweeted
New paper. A Positive Case for Faithfulness. When asked to explain their decisions, LLMs can give highly plausible self-explanations. But are these explanations actually faithful, or are they just post-hoc rationalizations? We measure faithfulness via simulatability.
2
12
1
58
5,744